Debate questions! (high score solution)

Money, with it, humble people become noble! The poor have become rich! Ugly people become beautiful! Incompetent people become powerful! Rich people become more respectful and greedy!

It has all the magical powers! Everything, everything! Without it, society can't function. Without it, people will return to primitive society.

At home, many people yearn for western ideology and culture, but when they go abroad, they will immediately find that what is more shocking and attractive than ideology and culture is the western material world as the basis of that kind of ideology and culture.

But to be honest, it is obvious that many foreign students in China eventually stayed overseas, not only because of the attraction of "democracy and freedom" in western countries, but also because of the "material temptation" in developed societies.

Pursuing a better material life should obviously not be a sin.

The traditional culture of China has always regarded the temptation of material as a kind of corrosion to human spirit. Ever since Confucius set an example, and Yan Hui issued the declaration of "Let fame and fortune be like clouds", people in China have always regarded "self-control if you are poor" as a rare moral realm.

In fact, material life has another influence on people's spiritual world.

Before going abroad, I interviewed an old economist who was a disciple of Mr Wang Yanan who translated Marx's Das Kapital. After attacking China's bureaucracy for a period of time, the old man told me that it is difficult for people to have any sense of democracy and freedom when the socialist economy is in short supply. To buy things in the street, you must have a ticket, beg from the shop assistant and go through the back door. This daily commodity trading activity virtually strengthens the individual's dependence on the government and society and shapes the servility of human beings.

After arriving in the United States, I found that the old economist's statement can be confirmed from another aspect. The richness of western materials makes people have a strong sense of choice since childhood. From daily commodities to future careers, from lifestyles to political parties and politicians, personal choice is often taken for granted. The individual's right to choose is essentially the most basic meaning of freedom and democracy.

Take the "American Dream" that people often say. The "American Dream" is first of all a very materialistic dream: a house-a house means family, children, cars, dogs and a stable job. However, some American scholars have emphasized that this materialized "American Dream" contains an American spirit: everyone has the right to pursue personal happiness and can realize his life dream through personal efforts.

Therefore, facing the material world of western society, China students are not only tempted by material, but also influenced by a kind of spirit.

The establishment of China students' "money consciousness" is based on their "poverty" experience after going abroad. It is precisely under the ruthless squeeze of the sense of "poverty" that the importance of money is rapidly highlighted. There is a simple reason. In western society, if you have no money, even if you are full of freedom, you don't have much freedom to enjoy. Even if everyone is equal, you will not get much respect. When I was a child, I learned the moral maxim: "Being rich is not necessarily happiness". After going abroad, I can understand from the opposite side: "No money is definitely not happiness".

China is a poor country, but after 1949, China people living in it did not feel so deeply about poverty. At that time, poverty in the whole country increased people's sense of equality. But when we went overseas, China people really felt how poor they were and how poor our country was. It seems that the Chinese nation can add "poverty" to "diligence" and "courage".

Many self-funded international students have spent many years saving only enough to buy a one-way ticket from China to the United States. When they get off the plane, they often have nothing in their pockets. No matter what you study is astrophysics or literary aesthetics, you have to go to China restaurant to wash dishes before pretending to discuss academic issues in class. When some well-known professors in China go abroad to be visiting scholars, they often have to live in other people's living rooms or buy some old clothes in flea markets because of money problems, which can't be said to be the level treatment of full professors.

A 48-year-old female visiting scholar studied in a university in new york. Soon after coming to the United States, she began to have a toothache and wanted to have her teeth pulled out. But her medical insurance doesn't cover dentists, so everyone advised her to put up with it, because seeing dentists in America is surprisingly expensive. After two days of forbearance, the female visiting scholar could no longer bear the pain and vowed, "No matter how much it costs, this tooth will be pulled out." So, everyone drove her there. Along the way, she kept covering her teeth and whining. When the car bumps, it's called pain. When I arrived at the hospital, the doctor had not seen it. On hearing the registration fee, the female visiting scholar immediately asked to go home. On the way back, strangely, I didn't shout toothache again.

The deeper you feel about poverty, the more strongly you feel the importance of money. But in a deeper sense, the real establishment of China students' "money consciousness" is actually the result of another "cultural shock".

China society before 1990s was essentially a power society. The basis of determining the relationship between people is a person's position and power in his society or family, and the whole society also runs around the axis of power. In this social environment, money can certainly make children push the mill, but it doesn't always lead the spirit.

America is a real money society. There, money is like an invisible hand, pushing the society to turn. This is a "mobile" society: there are no nobles and civilians, no upper and lower classes, only the rich and the poor. However, rich people may gradually lose money, and people without money may gradually make money.

1990 In the summer, organized by the School of Political Studies of the University of California, Berkeley, I went to Washington for a "field trip" with the summer seminar on "American Politics and Policy". There, we visited a law firm specializing in congressional lobbying. We were received by lawyer Kurzweil, one of the main partners of the company. During the discussion, the young professional lobbyist, with a straight suit, didn't want to hide how smart he was, and told everyone bluntly: "All the problems in America are ultimately a dollar problem. Any change, whether it is the passage of laws, the election of parliamentarians or the judgment of cases, ultimately means that the US dollar is transferred from the pockets of some people to the pockets of others. "

Indeed, in the United States, money can not only affect politics and economy, but also become the standard of value judgment, and even gradually penetrate into people's way of thinking.

In the early 1990s, former US President Bush officially announced a nationwide anti-drug campaign on TV. No slogans, no slogans, no mobilization meeting. The main action taken by Bush is to ask Congress to pass a drug control budget of tens of millions of dollars. This scene is quite similar to the irony of 1992 presidential candidate Perot in NBC's Weekend Nightlife program: the Texas billionaire's solution to the racial riots in Los Angeles is to send a check to Los Angeles and then announce that the problems in Los Angeles have been completely solved.

American society is like a big rotating machine that keeps making money and swallowing money. All people, whether businessmen or scholars, politicians or ordinary people, will involuntarily get involved in this society as long as they live in it for a long time.

A 35-year-old visiting scholar, after arriving in the United States, did nothing, did not visit, did not ask questions, did not study, and only worked to earn money every day. He said that his initial goal was to save enough 1 10,000. I can earn 10 thousand, but I want to save 20 thousand or 30 thousand As a result, I couldn't stop, so I kept playing. As far as arguments are concerned, you are obviously at a disadvantage! Few so-called fatal problems can kill each other.

The only thing you have to work hard at is how to argue!

You should emphasize the practical significance of money, and don't dwell too much on each other's problems. Otherwise, you will fall into the trap set by the other side. Don't let them lead you by the nose. Passive, even if you are positive, you are likely to lose. So you have to take the initiative. Control the rhythm in your own hands. Only in this way can we win!

The focus of debate is debate, not right or wrong.

You can go to Baidu and Google to search for the practical significance of money to our lives, such as "money is not everything, but you can't do anything without money". The other party may fight back and say, "The other party said that money is not everything. Have you already affirmed our view that life is beautiful because of honesty? " At this time, you have to explain that the beauty of life mainly lies in money. "We don't deny that honesty plays a non-dominant role in life!" Then you will be obsessed with this. Avoid misleading each other. Ha, a little stubborn and unreasonable, but sometimes the debate is like this. )

I just finished the debate. Indeed, taking part in the debate can give people a good exercise. Eloquence, appearance, way of thinking, psychological quality and so on, take it seriously! Have a great time! Never mind winning or losing.

Also, the effective cooperation of the four players is very important. You should strengthen communication.

Why does money have to smell like copper?

With money, we can have such an orderly economic society.

It can be said that currency makes it possible to trade in bulk and freely.

Imagine what our life would be like if it were still a barter society.

There will be no mass production in the factory.

Constantly communicate with people for the same necessities of life.

The invention of money is a manifestation of social progress.

Our present social prosperity is based on this kind of money.

Doesn't mean you can't be honest for money.

Honesty is also very important, but we can't deny the promotion of money to our lives just because of its subjective influence and social devaluation.

The endless convenience brought by money cannot be concealed by personal greed and strong possessiveness.

And the negative impact of money is not brought by itself.

It is caused by people's insatiable greed.

We can't blame money.

Money does its duty. Money itself has no attributes, but people's thoughts give it other connotations.

Bottom line: money is not everything, but without money, nothing can be done!

If there is no money in life except honesty, you may get sick and starve to death. But without honesty, you will be humiliated by others. It's best to have both.

First of all, I want to point out that the one upstairs can be regarded as the worst policy. There are three questions that guide everyone and each other to work hard on "beauty": first, extending beauty to quality, morality is no longer narrow, and it is easy to refute this point positively. Second, this topic cannot be reused, because it has little to do with the core of the proposition, and it is easy for the other party to attack the other party with "charges" such as stealing the concept. Third, if according to that brother's point of view, what is productivity is extended, then the positive side can turn the subject to subjective initiative and so on, and then say that productivity is created by people, not money. Well, what the opposing party may have to do next is to argue with the positive party on this far-fetched topic, and there is no result.

In addition, there is no secret weapon and no magic weapon to win the debate. Carefully prepared, there will be a hundred secrets. You can never know 100% what the other person is thinking, because the only thing you can be sure of is that the other person is thinking about how you plan and then "start" according to your plan. So just consider what kind of "counterattack" you may encounter in preparation, rather than imagining what your opponent is preparing.

I want to continue, but I really have no patience ... Who wrote this debate? This guy doesn't know what an argument is There is no contradiction in this debate. The core of these two topics does not conflict: money and integrity.

The essence and core of the so-called debate is to seek debate without seeking truth. Therefore, the debate must meet at least two basic requirements: first, it is not a question of "right and wrong", and the dual opposition of the debate must start a debate on an irrelevant right and wrong issue. For example, the classic debate topic "Men/women need more care" in the National College Debate Competition. Otherwise, one of them will be obviously passive. Second, there must be opposites and contradictions in the debate, and there must be no obvious conflicts and differences. How can we argue? It's not pleasant to say. Your debate needs the debater to invent and add many subjective things and orientations before it can be debated. This is obviously a public opinion-oriented debate, which sets the opposing side as a negative model to accept positive and public attacks and criticisms. Because the opponent must assume many premises, the proposition can be established, and the square can easily point out that the opponent's proposition is not established if it is based on assumptions through a few simple examples, and the square must also use assumptions to support the argument, but its assumptions are supported by facts and morality. So, do you think the opposite is just the object of ridicule? Seriously, if no one tells you in advance that all you have to do on the court is to fall behind and lose the game to tell you not to "regard money as life", then it will be an out-and-out conspiracy and sacrifice the passion of four young people!

If I were an opponent, I would refuse to play unless I changed the debate. I will tell the organizer that the opposing party is not a villain and has no obligation to be a negative example. The so-called opposite side is only aimed at the positive side. If possible, you should call both sides red and white the same. Please ask the organizer to understand the debate before organizing it.

P.S., are you a university or a middle school? If you are a middle school student, forget it. If you are a college student, I hope you can take a look at my suggestion. I spent four years on the debate team in college.

Although honesty is very important, but in a word: money is not everything, no money is absolutely impossible.

So if we spend every dollar, how can we tell the truth? Suppose a job needs honest people to do, but you have no money, which means you have no capital. Why are people looking for you?

Therefore, without money, honesty will not come to the door.

We are not greedy for money, but there is no money in life, which means that you are also living a mediocre life. If you are not mediocre, will you make money?

Life needs the most basic material foundation, and this foundation is money.

Money, with it, humble people become noble! The poor have become rich! Ugly people become beautiful! Incompetent people become powerful! Rich people become more respectful and greedy!

It has all the magical powers! Everything, everything! Without it, society can't function. Without it, people will return to primitive society.

Start with' beauty'!

When debating, lead beauty to a wider range.

Beauty is not a narrow part representing social morality and quality.

It represents a wider range, such as how money represents productivity and how it becomes a measure of social development.

Even Marx studied western economic history.

Raise the problem to the depth of philosophy and treat it dialectically and materialistically.

It is a typical historical materialism or idealism to be honest and proceed from the heart.

......

At home, many people yearn for western ideology and culture, but when they go abroad, they will immediately find that what is more shocking and attractive than ideology and culture is the western material world as the basis of that kind of ideology and culture.

But to be honest, it is obvious that many foreign students in China eventually stayed overseas, not only because of the attraction of "democracy and freedom" in western countries, but also because of the "material temptation" in developed societies.

Pursuing a better material life should obviously not be a sin.

The traditional culture of China has always regarded the temptation of material as a kind of corrosion to human spirit. Ever since Confucius set an example, and Yan Hui issued the declaration of "Let fame and fortune be like clouds", people in China have always regarded "self-control if you are poor" as a rare moral realm.

In fact, material life has another influence on people's spiritual world.

Before going abroad, I interviewed an old economist who was a disciple of Mr Wang Yanan who translated Marx's Das Kapital. After attacking China's bureaucracy for a period of time, the old man told me that it is difficult for people to have any sense of democracy and freedom when the socialist economy is in short supply. To buy things in the street, you must have a ticket, beg from the shop assistant and go through the back door. This daily commodity trading activity virtually strengthens the individual's dependence on the government and society and shapes the servility of human beings.

After arriving in the United States, I found that the old economist's statement can be confirmed from another aspect. The richness of western materials makes people have a strong sense of choice since childhood. From daily commodities to future careers, from lifestyles to political parties and politicians, personal choice is often taken for granted. The individual's right to choose is essentially the most basic meaning of freedom and democracy.

Take the "American Dream" that people often say. The "American Dream" is first of all a very materialistic dream: a house-a house means family, children, cars, dogs and a stable job. However, some American scholars have emphasized that this materialized "American Dream" contains an American spirit: everyone has the right to pursue personal happiness and can realize his life dream through personal efforts.

Therefore, facing the material world of western society, China students are not only tempted by material, but also influenced by a kind of spirit.

The establishment of China students' "money consciousness" is based on their "poverty" experience after going abroad. It is precisely under the ruthless squeeze of the sense of "poverty" that the importance of money is rapidly highlighted. There is a simple reason. In western society, if you have no money, even if you are full of freedom, you don't have much freedom to enjoy. Even if everyone is equal, you will not get much respect. When I was a child, I learned the moral maxim: "Being rich is not necessarily happiness". After going abroad, I can understand from the opposite side: "No money is definitely not happiness".

China is a poor country, but after 1949, China people living in it did not feel so deeply about poverty. At that time, poverty in the whole country increased people's sense of equality. But when we went overseas, China people really felt how poor they were and how poor our country was. It seems that the Chinese nation can add "poverty" to "diligence" and "courage".

Many self-funded international students have spent many years saving only enough to buy a one-way ticket from China to the United States. When they get off the plane, they often have nothing in their pockets. No matter what you study is astrophysics or literary aesthetics, you have to go to China restaurant to wash dishes before pretending to discuss academic issues in class. When some well-known professors in China go abroad to be visiting scholars, they often have to live in other people's living rooms or buy some old clothes in flea markets because of money problems, which can't be said to be the level treatment of full professors.

A 48-year-old female visiting scholar studied in a university in new york. Soon after coming to the United States, she began to have a toothache and wanted to have her teeth pulled out. But her medical insurance doesn't cover dentists, so everyone advised her to put up with it, because seeing dentists in America is surprisingly expensive. After two days of forbearance, the female visiting scholar could no longer bear the pain and vowed, "No matter how much it costs, this tooth will be pulled out." So, everyone drove her there. Along the way, she kept covering her teeth and whining. When the car bumps, it's called pain. When I arrived at the hospital, the doctor had not seen it. On hearing the registration fee, the female visiting scholar immediately asked to go home. On the way back, strangely, I didn't shout toothache again.

The deeper you feel about poverty, the more strongly you feel the importance of money. But in a deeper sense, the real establishment of China students' "money consciousness" is actually the result of another "cultural shock".

China society before 1990s was essentially a power society. The basis of determining the relationship between people is a person's position and power in his society or family, and the whole society also runs around the axis of power. In this social environment, money can certainly make children push the mill, but it doesn't always lead the spirit.

America is a real money society. There, money is like an invisible hand, pushing the society to turn. This is a "mobile" society: there are no nobles and civilians, no upper and lower classes, only the rich and the poor. However, rich people may gradually lose money, and people without money may gradually make money.

1990 In the summer, organized by the School of Political Studies of the University of California, Berkeley, I went to Washington for a "field trip" with the summer seminar on "American Politics and Policy". There, we visited a law firm specializing in congressional lobbying. We were received by lawyer Kurzweil, one of the main partners of the company. During the discussion, the young professional lobbyist, with a straight suit, didn't want to hide how smart he was, and told everyone bluntly: "All the problems in America are ultimately a dollar problem. Any change, whether it is the passage of laws, the election of parliamentarians or the judgment of cases, ultimately means that the US dollar is transferred from the pockets of some people to the pockets of others. "

Indeed, in the United States, money can not only affect politics and economy, but also become the standard of value judgment, and even gradually penetrate into people's way of thinking.

In the early 1990s, former US President Bush officially announced a nationwide anti-drug campaign on TV. No slogans, no slogans, no mobilization meeting. The main action taken by Bush is to ask Congress to pass a drug control budget of tens of millions of dollars. This scene is quite similar to the irony of 1992 presidential candidate Perot in NBC's Weekend Nightlife program: the Texas billionaire's solution to the racial riots in Los Angeles is to send a check to Los Angeles and then announce that the problems in Los Angeles have been completely solved.

American society is like a big rotating machine that keeps making money and swallowing money. All people, whether businessmen or scholars, politicians or ordinary people, will involuntarily get involved in this society as long as they live in it for a long time.

A 35-year-old visiting scholar, after arriving in the United States, did nothing, did not visit, did not ask questions, did not study, and only worked to earn money every day. He said that his initial goal was to save enough 1 10,000. I can earn 10 thousand, but I want to save 20 thousand or 30 thousand As a result, I couldn't stop, so I kept playing.

Why does money have to smell like copper?

With money, we can have such an orderly economic society.

It can be said that currency makes it possible to trade in bulk and freely.

Imagine what our life would be like if it were still a barter society.

There will be no mass production in the factory.

Constantly communicate with people for the same necessities of life.

The invention of money is a manifestation of social progress.

Our present social prosperity is based on this kind of money.

Doesn't mean you can't be honest for money.

Honesty is also very important, but we can't deny the promotion of money to our lives just because of its subjective influence and social devaluation.

The endless convenience brought by money cannot be concealed by personal greed and strong possessiveness.

And the negative impact of money is not brought by itself.

It is caused by people's insatiable greed.

We can't blame money.

Money does its duty. Money itself has no attributes, but people's thoughts give it other connotations.

First of all, I want to point out that the one upstairs can be regarded as the worst policy. There are three questions that guide everyone and each other to work hard on "beauty": first, extending beauty to quality, morality is no longer narrow, and it is easy to refute this point positively. Second, this topic cannot be reused, because it has little to do with the core of the proposition, and it is easy for the other party to attack the other party with "charges" such as stealing the concept. Third, if according to that brother's point of view, what is productivity is extended, then the positive side can turn the subject to subjective initiative and so on, and then say that productivity is created by people, not money. Well, what the opposing party may have to do next is to argue with the positive party on this far-fetched topic, and there is no result.

In addition, there is no secret weapon and no magic weapon to win the debate. Carefully prepared, there will be a hundred secrets. You can never know 100% what the other person is thinking, because the only thing you can be sure of is that the other person is thinking about how you plan and then "start" according to your plan. So just consider what kind of "counterattack" you may encounter in preparation, rather than imagining what your opponent is preparing.

I want to continue, but I really have no patience ... Who wrote this debate? This guy doesn't know what an argument is There is no contradiction in this debate. The core of these two topics does not conflict: money and integrity.

The essence and core of the so-called debate is to seek debate without seeking truth. Therefore, the debate must meet at least two basic requirements: first, it is not a question of "right and wrong", and the dual opposition of the debate must start a debate on an irrelevant right and wrong issue. For example, the classic debate topic "Men/women need more care" in the National College Debate Competition. Otherwise, one of them will be obviously passive. Second, there must be opposites and contradictions in the debate, and there must be no obvious conflicts and differences. How can we argue? It's not pleasant to say. Your debate needs the debater to invent and add many subjective things and orientations before it can be debated. This is obviously a public opinion-oriented debate, which sets the opposing side as a negative model to accept positive and public attacks and criticisms. Because the opponent must assume many premises, the proposition can be established, and the square can easily point out that the opponent's proposition is not established if it is based on assumptions through a few simple examples, and the square must also use assumptions to support the argument, but its assumptions are supported by facts and morality. So, do you think the opposite is just the object of ridicule? Seriously, if no one tells you in advance that all you have to do on the court is to fall behind and lose the game to tell you not to "regard money as life", then it will be an out-and-out conspiracy and sacrifice the passion of four young people!

If I were an opponent, I would refuse to play unless I changed the debate. I will tell the organizer that the opposing party is not a villain and has no obligation to be a negative example. The so-called opposite side is only aimed at the positive side. If possible, you should call both sides red and white the same. Please ask the organizer to understand the debate before organizing it.

P.S., are you a university or a middle school? If you are a middle school student, forget it. If you are a college student, I hope you can take a look at my suggestion. I spent four years on the debate team in college.

Although honesty is very important, but in a word: money is not everything, no money is absolutely impossible.

So if we spend every dollar, how can we tell the truth? Suppose a job needs honest people to do, but you have no money, which means you have no capital. Why are people looking for you?

Therefore, without money, honesty will not come to the door.

We are not greedy for money, but there is no money in life, which means that you are also living a mediocre life. If you are not mediocre, will you make money?

Life needs the most basic material foundation, and this foundation is money.

Just say: you will know the situation when you go around the society! The facts are convincing!