How to reduce the "educational burden reduction"?

Let's take a look at how our neighbors, countries J, K and T, "reduce the burden of education".

1: Teacher-Civil Service System At first glance, if you think teachers are simply too cool, you are wrong. When it was first implemented, those teachers who did not meet the quality of civil servants were gradually eliminated.

2. Unification of hardware facilities for basic education As long as there are places where citizens live, there are primary and secondary schools. The hardware facilities of primary schools are the same, the teaching buildings are exactly the same, and the classrooms are exactly the same, which is a "picture" of school construction for basic education. It is equivalent to walking into a remote mountainous area and finding that the infrastructure of primary schools is exactly the same as that of primary schools in big cities.

Principals, the flow of teachers is not unemployment, but the school where they work. They move every three years, and any principal and teacher can teach in a school for up to six years. Any teacher and headmaster must obey the orders of the government, because they are civil servants.

4. Salary If two teachers join the job at the same time, both of them are qualified in the annual assessment (the assessment is divided into two grades, qualified and unqualified, and they will leave the faculty to do other civil service duties. ), the wages of these two people are exactly the same. It has nothing to do with the workplace.

5. Student performance assessment Students' scores in various subjects are divided into five grades: A, B, C, D and E. There are still differences between students' scores, but not every score is important. 100 is the same as 90, because the scores are all a.

However, there are unfairness in fairness. For example, according to our country's regulations, many provinces stipulate that scores above 85 are excellent, and 85 and 100 are excellent, but there is a gap between 85 and 84, because one is excellent and the other is good.

6. Award-winning certificate No department may issue discipline competitions, art competitions or art grade certificates to primary school students. You want to give your child a piano grade certificate. Sorry, no department dares to send it to you. So what certificates do primary school students have? The answer is nothing.

7. Students go to school naturally in the compulsory education stage, and parents also have some choices. Parents are very happy, but the result of the election is that all schools look the same and teachers are mobile. And parents have no right to choose teachers, because teachers are sent by the government.

1, ten-year primary and secondary school system;

2. Cancel the senior high school entrance examination and popularize high schools;

3. Cancel key high schools and enroll in nearby schools;

4. Teachers rotate posts and schools;

5. Cancel the morning and evening self-study in primary and secondary schools;

6. Reduce the difficulty of teaching materials;

7. Socialized registration for college entrance examination;

8. It is strictly forbidden to set recruitment education requirements.

Reducing the burden of education is a false proposition.

If you are a primitive man, you said that you should reduce the burden through education, and I agree.

What is it now? What kind of society is it now? What is the situation facing children now?

Solving problems without looking at the background,

Pat your forehead to lighten the burden!

It's not stupid. What is this?

Modern society,

It's already very complicated,

People with strong abilities have a feeling that they can't cope.

Not to mention weak ability.

Do you want to be happy

Do you want to be happy

Please improve your ability and quality!

Insufficient ability and quality

Can you be happy?

Can you be happy?

groan

Here's the key,

Where do abilities and qualities come from?

Is it natural?

Dad, can I give you 100 million?

Do you still need to learn and realize?

Under the current educational system.

Studying hard may not work.

Not to mention not working hard.

,,

You can finally understand

Education burden reduction,

This is a decision made by a group of ignorant people.

Don't take it seriously!

Son, it's good that you are happy.

This is the deepest sentence I have ever heard from a liar in my life.

Our education

Lost what was handed down by our ancestors

Very suitable for China people.

Precious things to adapt to society.

New China,

This is really the new China,

Tear down all the past

No matter how

It's all down

Leaving only what China lacked most at that time.

Western natural science

Then let the children study hard.

Right?

,,

Our education,

Lost what is impossible to lose.

And you don't know it yet.

This is the most regrettable.

According to Chairman Mao's method! Simplify teaching materials, dilute exams, and choose candidates with political first and second grades! I remember that during the Cultural Revolution, there was no proposal to reduce the burden! Then reform the Ministry of Education! In fact, the responsibility for reducing the burden lies with the Ministry of Education!

Only by changing two points can we fundamentally change:

First, the university combines leniency with severity.

At present, the involution of education is very serious, and it is a "false proposition" to reduce the burden of education. Students enjoy happy education from school and are sent to remedial classes as soon as they leave school. Schools can't provide proper educational resources, which is "the loss of state-owned assets".

Why do parents object to "reducing the burden"? Because it is too difficult to enter universities, people pay more and more attention to education, so there are so many universities, and the competition will naturally become more and more fierce. Entering the university depends on a fateful college entrance examination, which means that everyone is trying their best to brush the questions, and it is getting harder and harder.

If the university can apply, it can be easily admitted to the university, but it needs a lot of students, otherwise it will not get a certificate for graduation. This kind of competition will change the way and be conducive to the all-round development of children.

Second, eliminate occupational discrimination.

An important reason for crossing the single-plank bridge with thousands of troops is occupational stratification, discrimination against vocational education and discrimination against some jobs, and behind this is the difference in work treatment and status.

When every job can enjoy the same welfare treatment and receive due respect, our education will have more choices, and students will not have to brush exams or compete desperately.

Neither teachers nor students should reduce their burdens! The solution to social contradictions is to increase the burden on parents! Let parents seriously study family education, learn to issue diplomas, and then have children, which will reduce many social contradictions!

It is a fact that students have many tasks and heavy burdens. Although they have been calling for reducing the burden, they have never really implemented it.

Let's see: Why do children have a heavy burden of going to school? How can we reduce the burden?

It is a fact that children here have a heavy burden of going to school. Many children are hardly at school, doing homework or fighting in various cram schools.

Our heavy educational burden is mainly caused by cultural problems, employment problems and social reality problems. Let's analyze why the education burden is so heavy.

1, China people have always attached importance to education, and every parent has the cultural gene of looking forward to his son's success and his daughter's success, which should be a tradition.

2. The pressure of entering a higher school is also one of the most important reasons. If you don't study hard and go to school hard, it is estimated that you won't even get into high school.

3. Although the theory of academic qualifications has made progress, it still exists. Good units or recruiting civil servants basically start with a bachelor's degree. If you don't study hard, you won't even get a "stepping stone"

Nowadays, the only way for most people to change their lives is to study hard and get into a good university. I can't help it Society is so realistic.

Schools and teachers have to take exams every day to force students to study for the sake of enrollment rate and admission rate.

6. The unfair distribution of educational resources is also an important reason. Some provinces and cities can easily grasp the key points, and some provinces and cities can "cross the bridge"!

In short, in the face of social reality and the pressure of entering a higher school, all slogans of reducing the burden are pale and powerless. Parents still have the same sentence in their hearts: don't let the children lose at the starting line!

We can learn from a country or province next door, make real changes and reduce the burden of education.

1, improve the treatment of teachers, preferably the establishment of civil servants. While improving the treatment, the requirements should also be strict, and the "one-vote veto system" should be implemented on issues such as teachers' morality and interests. This can greatly improve the comprehensive quality of teachers, and also put an end to the problem of not teaching in class and making up lessons after class.

2. Educational resources should be distributed fairly, and regional differences and admission scores should be abolished. Of course, we should also lean towards places where education is extremely backward, but we must make the standards public and not confuse them.

3, the exam is still to be taken, but not by scores, but by grades. For example, it is divided into five grades, and the score of each grade is an interval, thus reducing the intensity of competition.

Teachers in every school need to rotate teaching, for example, teachers rotate regularly between urban and rural areas and between districts. In this way, the teachers in each school are similar, which can avoid the problem of "squeezing their heads" in order to attend key schools.

5. The entrance examination cancels the way of "winning or losing by one test", but depends on the comprehensive academic performance and examination level within the academic system.

6. In the compulsory education stage, the hardware configuration of the school should be standardized, and everyone is the same, even the teaching building. Only in this way can we show that everyone is receiving compulsory education, rather than being divided into three, six and nine classes. There is no market for school districts.

7. Cancel all skills bonus policies, such as: Olympic Prize bonus, music bonus and so on. However, if you win a prize in an internationally recognized competition (the competition should be fixed and publicized), you will be admitted through an interview. In this way, the pressure on primary school students and extracurricular interest classes will be much less.

In short, reducing the burden of education mainly depends on: improving the quality and treatment of teachers, distributing educational resources fairly, reducing the policy of extra points, reducing the frequency and times of examinations, and making everyone in compulsory education equal.

Free for everyone.

Reducing the burden of education is a temporary solution, not a permanent cure.

Throughout the ages, China people have positive examples of hard work. There are too many things to do. Dig a wall to get through, and snow stands at the door. What do these stories convey? Is to study hard.

Whether it is the ancient imperial examination system or the current college entrance examination system, it is a fair way to select talents. Improve the difficulty of examination papers and let truly capable people go to better universities. If someone can attend 985, isn't it compulsory education?

In fact, now the country proposes to reduce the burden, which is largely "kidnapped" by a group of low-knowledge people who have not studied for a few days. They think my children need rest and play. The supervision of children is not in place, the responsibility is pushed to the game company, and the country is loudly called to shut down online games. I didn't play online games twenty years ago, so I didn't become a success myself.

Parents who really want to train their children into useful people will try their best to let them learn more knowledge and skills. For example, in addition to good grades, college students nowadays have at least one specialty: the beauty of sound and body. These skills are the future capital of children.

The rapid development of China relies on talented people with knowledge and ability. I'm not a scum who grew up playing mobile phone and watching TV. Selecting these talents from1400 million people can only pass the exam. If your children want to win, they must be good enough. If you want to be excellent, you must study hard.

There are still many people who point the finger at the teacher. This is ridiculous. I can only say that such people have never learned in school. Even if the professor teaches your child, he won't. Because as parents, there is no correct world outlook. How good can children be?

If the teacher forces you to make up lessons, or you don't make up lessons in class, report it directly! If you watch other people's children make up lessons, and you have no money to make up for them, then review it yourself.

Teaching is mainly about educating people. Yesterday, I saw an interview about Yun-peng Yue. He said that he was most grateful to one of his teachers, Miss Su. Because his family was poor when he was a child, all the clothes he wore were left by his sister. His classmates laughed at him, and he also wanted to cut off the flowers on his clothes. But Mr. Su told his classmates not to laugh at anyone's clothes, just clean them. No matter how beautifully dressed, dirty clothes are not as good as others'? Therefore, Yun-peng Yue will be able to go to school with his head held high, and his classmates will never laugh at him again. Therefore, teachers should not only teach students to learn, but also teach them to have a correct outlook on life and values.