1 person drowned, 7 people were rescued and 8 people drowned. Should parents of primary school students be banned or accompanied?

Although primary school students go to the seaside to play with water, most of them should be accompanied rather than prohibited, but to be honest, most of the parents now are unable to help. Swimming in the swimming pool, accompanied by the Chongqing incident, only other parents have an object of condemnation. The following specific analysis:

1. Now the parents of primary school students are from the late 1980s to around 95. In their education, dullness is no longer mandatory. People in the 85-95 age group are actually a little embarrassed. Say something unkind? Half the earth and half the ocean? Our living environment, at this age, happens to be the time when rural areas slowly migrate to cities. Although most of our childhood was in the countryside, as our parents went out to work, they were slowly leaving the mountain village.

Although it is a good thing to get out of mountain villages, the survival skills of some mountain villages no longer exist. What is the most obvious? Waterborne? .

Yes, we are talking about water, not swimming. Being dull and swimming are two different things. A good swimmer can let a person dominate the swimming pool, but it is impossible for them to cross a river and swim upstream and downstream. For example, these parents may not have the ability to swim in the reservoir, so their children will not, so the companionship will not change much.

Second, the water in the swimming pool is different from the water by the river, so swimming may not work. In this incident in Chongqing, eight primary school students were playing with water by the Yangtze River. Swimming alone can't save this place. When they fall into the water, more parents can do nothing. The professional level of riverside rescue far exceeds that of swimming pool.

Therefore, even if parents are around, single parents can't change much. At most, it can prevent primary school students from being rescued, but parents may not be able to save them. However, children should stop drinking when they go to deep water. Let you play in the water, don't go to the deep water area, it is the meaning of parents' company.

Third, although escort can prevent primary school students from drowning more than prohibition, as long as something goes wrong, parents will basically be abolished. It is said that companies with single-parent families may be in trouble. In fact, this is a test of human nature. In the case of several primary school students playing together, if someone drowns, parents may not be able to blame anything, because it is not the child who intentionally violently attacks other children, and nothing will happen.

However, if a parent is accompanied by one person and several children drown at the same time, everyone will be happy to be rescued, but as long as one or two children are saved, the parents will hold him responsible. This is not impossible, human nature is unpredictable.

Fourth, the author's words: although there is a sentence? Swimming well will drown? However, if you know water, you can always save yourself, but you don't have systematic teaching. Personally think primary school students should do it? Waterborne? Some people may throw pots on textbooks, but I want to say that these are actually in primary school textbooks, but they are all in the courses of nature, physical education, ideology and morality, especially nature and physical education. In some schools, no one even asks students to open these textbooks carefully.

People who drown can swim? Just remind everyone to have awe of water, and everything will be fine if you don't know how to swim. Most schools only have one physical education class a week, and PE teachers still have it from time to time? What's wrong with you? This has become a common problem and is not taken seriously. This problem is not only in schools, but also in parents, especially when running laps has become corporal punishment not long ago. What about first aid education?

It has been suggested that students should have the skills of outdoor survival, but it has never been put into practice. Can't blame the education system, many of our parents are used to it? Forbidden? Solve problems, not accompany them.