Marx's Reading Report War and Peace

Lev tolstoy's most classic work "War and Peace" was finally read completely recently, which coincided with Marx's upcoming class and the need to read a report. I am full of feelings for this place.

? What impressed me most about Marxism was the famous saying given by the teacher in the first class, "Philosophers only explain the world in different ways, and the problem is to change the world."

? I have heard too many people say to me, "What's the use of philosophy?" I've been thinking about philosophy all day, but I still can't be accepted by the world and completely change the world. But philosophy is useful, and life without philosophy is meaningless. I don't want to say anything publicly to express my public views, because I think anyone's cognition and pursuit are really different, so I shouldn't and have no right to criticize someone or a group from the moral high ground when I am only one person. On the other hand, all kinds of complacent people speak at will to incite emotions and make comments, and even vulgar people are in high positions and lead the mainstream of society. I really have to talk.

? War and Peace is an excellent novel with almost equal emphasis on idealism and realism. On the premise of trying to restore the social background of all beings, I also saw their idealistic images. In the final analysis, should people indulge in endless desires all their lives, and then get them by hook or by crook and then indulge indefinitely? Do you want to put up with everything and sacrifice everything for fame? Is it like that handsome man, when dying on the battlefield, quietly looking at the sky and seeing through everything, just to enjoy the tranquility and detachment at that moment? Or would you rather put a moth to the fire for your own righteousness, or even try to assassinate Napoleon alone like a fat man?

Here, we have to say two attitudes towards life. Generally speaking, it is idealism and realism. What's the use of this socialist distinction? Philosophy exists, we think, we consider, we have a socialist constraint as a benchmark to weigh, we have lived all our lives, and we form a society to form an era. I'm sure Muyu Shui Xin's point of view is that the most obvious understanding of idealism is to pay attention to right and wrong, and realism weighs the interests of good and bad. Yes, I know. Han Han said that children only look at right and wrong, while adults look at pros and cons. I can't say that adults are immature, and I can't deny that this maturity has maintained the relative stability of today's society. Just like people in novels, just like people in today's society, they stay together for interests and temporary happiness. Because they are dissatisfied with interests and have no feelings, they leave rationally, just like Xiaoming and Xiao Si who killed people in four-hour movies.

? Very interesting. Once there was a former green tea bitch who was a very good friend of mine. She said, stay together if you like, and leave peacefully if you are unhappy. I've been thinking, is this right? If people say "we are happy now, and we enjoy the happiness together" and "if we are not happy, we will be separated peacefully, we are not sad, and we have been happy" before they fall in love and become friends, well, if so, it is to satisfy our desires, which has nothing to do with love, but to have fun, and I can't complain without love. And I want to ask the story of those green tea bitches and honest people. The green tea bitches don't mean I'm playing. The spare tire is exclusive and licks the dog. I am dubious that this will save some sincere people from harm, but I deny this idea of conniving at fickle feelings. Just like the big fish Haitang, the hostess can forgive her love, which is so unacceptable to the world. For the benefit, people will approach wealth and power regardless of their feelings. People have difficulties, but they don't help and don't care about jokes. Does such a society encourage people to develop their own efforts? If I step on you, will I win

? This novel also reflects the duality of many people, but we must not reject the previous examples of swearing because a great man's humanity is as beautiful as a flower, nor can we think that the wicked can be forgiven because a small person has a little humanity. Irrationally speaking, isn't it because people indulge themselves that this idealistic era has declined? In this context, how to prove that idealism is correct? Under the wrong rules, war and peace will only be called art and will not be practiced.

? Thank you for this epic. Let me know that great artists still have lofty aspirations, and let me believe that the good qualities of human beings have always existed. Ma Yuan's spirit guides humanistic care, which I have also seen in the works of so-called capitalist westerners. I hope people can really wake up from this point, can pursue the real life of peaceful war, and implement Ma Yuan's belief in changing society, which will finally shine in this era!