How to write a comment on the winning composition

The writing of composition evaluation should follow the following five principles.

First, be concise and avoid triviality.

Comment writing must be concise and easy to understand. Don't use too professional terms, such as some terms in literary criticism now, which are too far from the acceptance of middle school students and should not be used, but the center, theme, structure, thinking, level, technique, bedding, echo and foil can of course be used. There is no terminology at all, which will bring serious difficulties to expression. Comments should not be too long, let alone nonsense. Too long for students to watch; Redundancy is even more boring.

Second, it is expensive and accurate, not comprehensive.

The so-called precision means less and more appropriate. A student's work, no matter its advantages or disadvantages, is always multifaceted, so it is not appropriate to comment on everything. The former one covers everything, and the latter one is difficult to do and can only be repeated. A comprehensive comment is that the shortcomings are exclusive and the advantages cannot be really moved. When writing comments, we should grasp the most important or prominent advantages and disadvantages to give comments. Or consciously focus on one aspect at a time, a set of systematic writing techniques will be formed in a certain period of time. Or comment on the goal direction of composition guidance teaching. For example, the teaching focus of writing instruction course is clarity, so when correcting homework, we will focus on the regularity of homework.

Third, you prescribe the right medicine and avoid ambiguity.

When writing comments, some teachers use nonsense that is universally applicable. If the center is clear, the organization is clear and the language is fluent, what's more, they will comment on things like "well written", "improved" and "great". Such comments are either basically correct nonsense or pale affirmation and praise, which I call vague. The so-called symptomatic, that is, targeted, seize a point, refer to the lack of implementation, and promote its reflection and promotion; Give encouragement, rely on it, and make it get an unforgettable sense of progress.

Fourth, emphasize incentives and belittle incentives.

Dihuidos, a famous French educator, said that the essence of educational art is to inspire and awaken. The writing of composition evaluation should also follow this law. The basic fact is that students' work definitely does more harm than good, and students are constantly correcting their shortcomings and making progress. If you must evaluate objectively when writing comments, most exercises are always full of shortcomings, which will inevitably ruin students' interest in writing. Students have completely lost interest in writing. How to improve their writing ability? Based on this analysis, teachers should pay more attention to advantages, find bright spots, see progress and give practical affirmation and encouragement, especially to relatively backward students. Of course, the shortcomings are not unspeakable. If you don't talk about shortcomings, students will have no standard to judge right or wrong, and then there will be no direction to move forward. Pointing out the shortcomings, as mentioned above, must be implemented, pay attention to concrete, such as the language is not vivid enough, or the theme is not very prominent, so it is not enough.

Five, your norms, avoid random.

Some teachers' comments are scrawled, random in format, clumsy in sentence making, and even have language errors and typos. Such comments are really nonstandard. Writing is expression. Students write an exercise and the teacher writes some comments. The sentences that caused the teacher to write were not as good as the students' in both form and content. How do they positively influence students and set an example? The author puts forward this principle in order to promote the standardization of students with the standardization of teachers. Therefore, the style of comment on writing should be a sample of language expression. Otherwise, what we laugh at is that we are Marxists to others and liberals to ourselves, which will become a joke for students in the future. Writing reviews is by no means an easy task. Pay attention not only to attitude, but also to kung fu.

I hope my five points will be helpful to new teachers or inexperienced teachers, and I also look forward to Fang Jia's correction.