Yang Zhenning proposed that the universe is not conserved and won the Nobel Prize. Why didn't Hawking?

First of all, Hawking's contribution to physics, generally speaking, the singularity of the universe and the evaporation theory of black holes are all derived from Einstein's general theory of relativity. Under the current scientific and technological conditions, there is no possibility of verification at all. Nobel prizes are generally awarded to verified theories, just like Einstein published five papers in 1905, which is recognized as the Nobel Prize level by the scientific community, but Einstein won a Nobel Prize only for the smallest photoelectric effect in his life. General relativity didn't win the prize, and Hawking had nothing to be wronged.

However, Yang Zhenning won the Nobel Prize in Physics the following year after 1956 put forward parity non-conservation, and since he won the prize, seven Nobel Prizes have appeared in succession to prove Young's standard theory, such as the Higgs God particle discovered by Ding Zhaozhong. In other words, Yang Zhenning led his disciples and grandchildren to monopolize the theoretical and experimental parts of the Nobel Prize in Physics almost in the post-Einstein era. In addition, there are six Fields Prizes related to the Young Mills Equation.

In addition, in 1994, the Franklin Institute of the United States awarded Yang Zhenning an award-Bauer Award. The reason is that Yang Zhenning proposed a generalized field theory model, which integrated the physical laws of nature.

It can be arranged in the work of Newton, Maxwell and Einstein. Now those three people have already boarded the heaven, and the only living Yang Zhenning is known as the first person in physics. Therefore, it is clear who is better, Hawking or Yang Zhenning. When the public opinion calms down, perhaps the public will find that Hawking is only a physically disabled and determined patient, but he is by no means a great physicist.