Please answer this question if you have passed or intend to pass the civil service examination.

1. The ugly girl didn't tell the kidnapper that she was ugly before being kidnapped, which violated the kidnapper's right to know as a consumer. Therefore, according to the Consumer Protection Law, the kidnapper can ask for a return. So the kidnapper is the victim, and the kidnapper can not bear any legal responsibility. The ugly girl should pay the ransom of the kidnappers in double indemnity according to the market conditions, and compensate the kidnappers for their mental damages as appropriate.

2. The kidnapper's throwing the car keys to the ugly girl does not constitute a gift. If the driver's license, the purchase surcharge certificate, the car purchase invoice and the identity card of the owner of the car are thrown to the ugly girl together, and the written certificate of entrusting the ugly girl to transfer the ownership is written down, then the gift relationship can be established.

3. Yes, as mentioned in question 2. There are two possibilities. One is to marry the kidnapper and legally acquire half the ownership of the motor vehicle. 2 is as follows ...

4. Yes. However, the motor vehicle should be handed over to the police uncle first, and no owner will come to collect it after three months of custody, so the ugly woman can legally own the motor vehicle.

5. The behavior of ugly women belongs to the crime of taking power for personal gain.

Answer 2:

1. Does the kidnapper constitute the crime of kidnapping or crime of trafficking in women and children, and is it a crime suspension, accomplishment or attempted? I am not very familiar with the criminal law, but I think it is a crime of kidnapping and the crime is suspended. If the consequences of a criminal act do not occur due to subjective reasons, it belongs to the suspension of crime.

2. Does the kidnapper throw the car keys to the ugly girl constitute a gift? It doesn't constitute a gift. His key throwing behavior should be angry and determined, not to say that he gave it to you.

3. Can an ugly woman legally acquire the ownership of the vehicle? After the criminal abandoned the car, it became ownerless. However, who owns the ownerless things, except for those expressly stipulated by law, such as wildlife resources and other countries, there are no other regulations. According to the inheritance law, the inheritance without owner belongs to the state, so the original view is that everything without owner belongs to the state. Personally, I don't agree with it, but I agree with the view of preemption. However, the property law does not stipulate the preemption system. However, the undeniable fact is that in real life, everyone admits to preemption. Therefore, if the ugly woman takes the car first, she can get the ownership through preemption. After the introduction of the property law, the ownership transfer can take place without waiting for the record. Therefore, ownership transfer can occur without registration. ; In addition, this case is not caused by the change of property rights, so it does not need to be registered. Therefore, preemption can obtain ownership.

4. If the kidnapper abandons the vehicle and leaves, can the ugly woman get the ownership of the vehicle by preemption? Sure. 5. If the ugly woman says: If you don't marry me, I want your car, and the kidnapper is forced to give it to the ugly woman, does the ugly woman constitute a crime, a crime of robbery, extortion, or something else? His behavior does not constitute coercion, so it should not constitute a crime. Because, whether to marry the ugly girl, the man has the right to decide. It is not out of necessity. The act of handing it over to an ugly woman can be regarded as a gift. However, the gift contract is definitely not a true expression of will, but what kind of expression of will is not true? Worth studying. If it is defined as coercion, I disagree. It is not a hypocritical expression. The hypocritical expression stipulated by our country is only malicious collusion and covering up illegal purposes in a legal form. Nor does it belong to genuine reservation. Therefore, it is worth studying what kind of meaning is untrue. It tends to be hypocritical.