Liu Chan eats candy jokes.

"Businessmen don't know how to hate their country, but still sing backyard flowers across the river." This poem by Li Shangyin shows the insensitivity and helplessness of the people at the bottom of the society to the hatred of the family and the country. Although no one has the right to stand on the commanding heights of morality and criticize the choices or submission of different classes to life, we should not use some reluctant thinking to cover up our thoughts on feelings, ethics and morality.

In history, unhappy Liu Chan has also caused two extreme discussions because of his numbness in dealing with the problem of national extinction. Those who support him think that he is a smart man who follows the trend; Those who oppose him think that he has no integrity and no bottom line. On the surface, both sounds make sense.

However, their understanding of history and life issues is one-sided. In fact, Liu Chan's story throws us a human question-how should we choose when life and dignity conflict?

There is no standard answer to this question in the big environment. Because everyone faces different environments, different values and different ideological consciousness, it is impossible to make the same choice and the criteria for judging are different. However, "being happy but not doing it" is a specific case in a specific environment. Is the logical direction behind it desirable? It is still worthy of our serious consideration!

What kind of person is Liu Chan? There are many voices about the historical image of Liu Chan in history. Some people say that he is a man of great wisdom, some people say that he is a man waiting to die, and some people say that he has no opinion ... But from my personal point of view, Liu Chan should not be a controversial person, he is just a "helper".

From the biographies of Zhuge Liang, Empress Zhu, Qiao Zhou, Dong Yun Lian, Chen Zuo and Huang Hao, to the biographies of Deng Ai and other documents, almost everywhere, the personal outline is outlined-no talent, no virtue and no power.

1, like fun, like women.

This is not because history has captured the shadow of Liu Chan, but because there are too many real hammers. Let's take a look at some historical materials first.

After that, the master had a good view on tourism and broadened the vocal music. Biography of Three Kingdoms Qiao Zhou

(Liu Chan) As for the four-time worship, there may be some opinions about not coming to the pool garden, or there may be some opinions about coming out. The minister is stupid and sluggish, and he is not at ease. If the husband is worried about his health, he will not be able to enjoy himself. If the ambition of the first emperor is not fulfilled, it is not time to enjoy yourself. Biography of Three Kingdoms Qiao Zhou

The latter often has to choose and fill the harem, but (Dong) agrees that there are only twelve emperors in ancient times, and now they have them, so they are not suitable for obtaining them, so they refuse to listen. Three Kingdoms Dong Yunchuan

Quotations like the above can be found everywhere in all kinds of historical books about Shu Han. We often say, just be yourself and don't care too much about the outside world. However, when most people around us say that they have some kind of problems, shouldn't we reflect? The truth is in the hands of a few people, and this sentence cannot be an excuse for us to cover up our shortcomings and go our own way. In the eyes of most people, Liu Chan is a dissolute, arrogant and dissolute person, which is inseparable from Liu Chan's own style.

Of course, we still have to be objective, which can only explain Liu Chan's lifestyle, but not prove Liu Chan's wisdom. People with decadent life but superior wisdom abound in history, and the private lives of emperors with great talents and abilities like Cao Cao and Li Shimin can't stand scrutiny. The logical relationship between the depravity of Liu Chan's life and his wisdom remains to be discussed later.

2, close to the villain, away from the virtuous minister

Yan Xi nine years (246) after the death of Jiang Wan, Liu Chan began to take power in person. At this time, he was thirty-nine years old. If he is really a man of wisdom, ambition and pursuit, as later generations have washed, then he is in the prime of his life and at the peak of his life, and he can make bold efforts to gradually develop Shu into a powerful country.

But it was also from this time that Shu began to decline at a high speed, and what it did was completely in line with the description of "being a villain and a distant minister" in Zhuge Liang's Model.

For example, he was disgusted with Dong Yun, because Dong Yun used to tell Liu Chan to be diligent and love the people when he wanted to indulge himself. For example, Liu Chan often wants to drive fast after drinking, and Dong Yun often stands in front of the car and says loudly, "Leader, you can't drink and drive! This is harming others and harming yourself! "

Therefore, when Liu Chan saw Dong Yun, he didn't look good. On the one hand, he can understand Liu Chan from the perspective of human nature and desire, but on the other hand, he just exposed that Liu Chan is a leader without any model and wisdom.

Because (Chen) only met once, the late master blamed (Dong) and tolerated him deeply, saying that he despised himself, and only one person penetrated into his ears. Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Chen Zuo

So, what kind of courtiers did Liu Chan like after he took office? Is a jester like Chen Zuohuang Hao. What is a jester? It is the courtiers who gossip and turn black and white. Such people often have no bottom line. As long as they can get benefits, they will do anything by hook or by crook.

The most common trick of this kind of jester is "Smith", who revolves around the leader every day, trying to make the leader happy, and then domineering in the name of the leader. Anyone with a little common sense and reason can feel the horror of this kind of person. However, Liu Chan likes this poisonous chicken soup. As long as it can make me feel happy, even if you hook up with my lover behind my back, you are the most sensible messenger in my eyes and the most heartfelt subordinate.

Chen Zuodai promised to supplement it, and he and Huang Hao showed kindness to each other, and Hao began to treat it. After his death, Hao was ordered by Huangmenling to serve as a general's servant and conductor in a car, manipulating the handle and eventually returning to China. Shu people think about it. Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Chen Zuo

The behavior of "loving a villain and being a distant minister" has brought unimaginable harm to Shu, which is also an important argument of this paper.

3, cowardice, regardless of dignity

There is still controversy among the people about Liu Chan's choice to give up resistance and surrender, so I also avoid this issue for the time being. Let's see how Liu Chan surrendered to Wargo of Wei. See what is indisputable cowardice and downright shameless.

(Deng) When Ai arrived in Chengdu, Zen led more than 60 princes and bound the city gates. Ai Zhijie untied the shackles and burned them. Deng Ai Biography of the Three Kingdoms

Here, "Ku" means coffin, that is to say, Liu Chan tied himself up and carried the coffin to the front of Wargo military camp for mercy. Although losers have to bear the shame of losers, shame does not mean there is no bottom line.

You can't beat others, and it's not too shameful to take the initiative to admit defeat, but it's a bit spineless to take the initiative to kneel down. It's not enough to take the initiative to help others. lick the shoes is immoral and unworthy. What's more, as the king of a country, Wargo is just a coach, and he has no right or dare to treat you as anything. As for being so humble?

To sum up, Liu Chan is an extremely selfish and weak person in essence, a person without faith and bottom line, and also a person without courage and responsibility. This kind of person can hardly become a person of great wisdom.

Why did Liu Chan become that person? From the above description, I think whether Liu Chan is a man of great wisdom, the answer has jumped to the page. However, in order for us to understand Liu Chan more stereoscopically and objectively, and to think about something more comprehensively and deeply. Let's discuss why Liu Chan became such a person. We usually say that a person's personality is inseparable from his growing environment. In fact, this growing environment includes many aspects, such as family background, educational experience and self-thinking. The environment has a great influence on a person, so I won't say more. As long as we carefully look at social topics such as "it is difficult for poor families to have expensive children", "the influence of corporate culture on an employee" and "the personality characteristics of children in single-parent families", we will have some experience.

Liu Chan also grew up in an environment of no fixed abode. Like his ancestor Liu Bang, Liu Bei has a set of skills in starting a business, but he has no time and energy to take care of his family and children all the year round, and he is not very concerned. For a child, the final formation of personality is most closely related to the companionship and education of parents.

Therefore, we must maintain a high degree of rationality in life. Is career important or family important? Although everyone's ranking will be different, don't lose sight of one thing and lose sight of another, and completely abandon that for this.

In the 12th year of Jian 'an (207), Liu Bang was 46 years old and lived in Jingzhou. It was also in this difficult period that Liu Chan was born. In the 13th year of Jian 'an (208), Cao Cao went south, Liu Bei fled in defeat, abandoned his wife and children, and was displaced in troubled times.

In the 16th year of Jian 'an (2 1 1), 50-year-old Liu Bei led an army into Sichuan at the invitation of Liu Zhang, while 4-year-old Liu Chan was left in Jingzhou and raised by his stepmother Sun Quan's sister. Although there is no clear record in the history books about how Mrs. Sun treated her, Mrs. Sun's arrogant and overbearing personality is well known, and it is estimated that she has not been well cared for and educated.

In the 24th year of Jian 'an (2 19), Liu Bei called Hanzhong King and made twelve-year-old Liu Chan Prince. In the first year of Zhangwu (22 1), Liu Chan was fourteen years old, and Liu Bangcai began to arrange Dong Yun to teach Liu Chan.

Compared with Cao Cao's children, Liu Chan is really not on the stage. We are often taught not to let children lose at the starting line. But many times, children really start to lose at the starting line.

Liu Chan's fate is a bit like Liu Ying's, but he is not as lucky as Liu Ying. First, his father Liu Bei is not as powerful as Liu Ying's father Liu Bang; Second, his mother was not as good as Liu Ying's mother, Lv Zhi, and he died young.

Due to the lack of parents' companionship and education in his early years, Liu Chan felt insecure and responsible. In most cases, such people are only suitable for some days of mixed food and death, and it is difficult to achieve great things. A person who has no big pattern and is not brave enough will often indulge in his own small world, content with the comfort in front of him, and muddle along for stability.

Liu Chan's character can also be found in many of us. Do really rich and powerful people feel unsafe? Will a man full of fighting spirit and perseverance muddle along? Will truly brave and strong people choose to compromise? The behavior of each of us is a certain character that supports our spiritual identity in our bones, and the cultivation of each character is influenced by our experience, knowledge, pattern and transformation.

The wisdom flaw of "Don't think about Shu" The story of "Don't think about Shu" is a household name in China. Generally speaking, after leading the Shu soldiers to surrender without fighting, they were dubbed as "Le Gong", eating, drinking and having fun every day, completely forgetting that their country had perished. However, people as cunning as Si Mazhao are still uneasy about Liu Chan. In addition to constantly arranging various entertainment programs to stifle Liu Chan's thoughts, they constantly humiliated and tested Liu Chan whenever possible.

One day, I invited people to dinner and deliberately invited them to perform acrobatics in Shu, trying to humiliate these Shu people. Everyone else was hurt, but Liu Chan cheered loudly. Holding a gun and a stick, he deliberately asked if he wanted to go to Shu, and replied, "I am very happy here, but I don't want to go to Shu." After listening, Sima Zhao smiled and was full of contempt.

The story of "being happy without thinking about Shu" later became a typical example of "having no ambition", but many people also understood it as the wisdom of being wise and protecting our health.

There is no absolute right or wrong in the above two views, because everyone has different basis and conditions for making choices, and we can neither be fully prepared nor complacent. First of all, we must admit that under the circumstances of "killing me" at that time, Liu Chan really had no choice but to save his life. But we must also understand that Liu Chan's practice can only be said to be a compromise, not a kind of wisdom.

Because from a fundamental political point of view, Liu Chan's happiness is not the decisive factor for his ultimate survival. Have you ever seen an emperor who was determined to kill you because you said, "I am very happy here" and let you go? Therefore, we have to understand the truth that hatred that can be resolved is real hatred, similar to "problems that can be solved with money are not problems."

If a person is really determined to kill you, please remember that begging for mercy and pretending to be a coward will only make you die faster. When a cat sees a mouse, it doesn't choose to eat it. It just flirts with it blindly, which only shows that the cat doesn't want to or can't eat the mouse yet, not because the mouse pretends to be poor.

So, is it unreasonable or useless to admit cowardice? Yes, we just need to divide the objects and situations. For example, if your husband and wife quarrel and want a divorce, if both sides still have feelings and say that divorce is only a temporary anger, then one party can realize cowardice and resolve the contradiction. If your relationship has broken down and you are determined to divorce, it's no use what you think.

For example, if you make a mistake at work, your leader will be angry and will punish you. If your leader is a kind-hearted person, if you admit your mistakes and cowardice to him, it will also make him soft-hearted and reduce your assessment; If your leader is a man with a heart of stone and no one knows him, your mistakes and cowardice will only make him feel more natural and grandiose when dealing with you. ...

The truth of life is never static, we should learn to analyze the specific situation. In this way, let's see why Liu Chan's happiness is not wisdom, but a joke. Look at its logical loopholes.

1, the sentence "Enjoy yourself here and don't think about home" is actually not at all level, let alone wisdom. Your company went bankrupt and got a job in a new company. The new leader asks what you think. You said this company was fun, and you didn't want to be that stupid house.

This kind of talk is not good enough. In fact, the purpose of putting pressure on him is obvious and simple, that is, to confirm that he has no intention of restoration and does not pose a political threat to Wei. As long as Liu Chan has mastered this basic principle, there is absolutely no need to put down his dignity to answer this question.

2, wisdom is often a two-way role, it depends on the performance of the parties, but also on the true will of the opponent. Because Si Mazhao has just succeeded in stealing the country and Wu Dong has not been destroyed, his mind to destroy Liu Chan is not heavy. Liu Chan didn't even realize this signal, and it was obviously flattering to raise his happy behavior to the level of wisdom.

3. A gentleman does something, some things can be done but not said, and some things can be said and not done. If you are happy, you can only do it, not say it. Because Shu has perished, it's nothing to stay in Wei for dinner! This is within the acceptable range of human feelings, but if it is said publicly, it will become a sign that you have no backbone and no integrity.

If there are friends who can't understand this logic, for example, can a woman who has slipped publicly say her occupation? Whether you have to or not, whether you really enjoy it or not, you can't say "enjoy it."

What a person should do and say depends not only on his own ability, but also on his own identity. Liu Chan is not an ordinary person. He was once the king of a country. Shu perished, perhaps only because of his ability; However, saying that "his family is unhappy" can only show that there is something wrong with his pattern and morality.

You are an ordinary employee of the company, and you can be much better in other companies. However, as a company executive, you must not make such negative remarks. As a soldier, you can say that you can't do it when you encounter difficulties; But if you lead a team, can you say you don't want to do it?

Each of us has our own identity and status. Accordingly, we should enjoy the corresponding treatment and dignity, and at the same time bear the corresponding responsibilities and obligations. These are all the factors that we need to consider when facing the choice. Obviously, Liu Chan only enjoyed the benefits and aura that he should enjoy as a monarch, but did not undertake the corresponding responsibilities and obligations. Life-saving philosophy is at best a little cleverness, far from great wisdom.

Thinking: The Choice of Life and Dignity In fact, when we discuss Liu Chan's "being happy without thinking about home", we are essentially discussing how to make a choice when life and dignity conflict, which is also the fundamental reason why Liu Chan gives people two different impressions. People who care about life itself will feel that his words and deeds are human nature and even full of wisdom; People who value and morality will never think that Liu Chan's "being happy without thinking about home" is a kind of wisdom.

We often face problems similar to those in Liu Chan. For example, if you beg me, I will let you go; For example, if you say you love me, you don't even have the sincerity to bow your head and shine my shoes. What makes you say you love me? For example, if the leader asks you if you feel good working under me, you can only bite the bullet and say yes. ...

Then, in the face of conflicts of interest, how should we choose? What does it mean to choose the lesser of two evils? Is to choose a choice that does less harm to yourself. This may seem like nonsense, but many people can't do it well. Because many people don't understand what is the real benefit and what is the real harm to themselves; I don't know what kind of damage is bigger and longer.

People who are narrow-minded, short-sighted, slow-minded, shallow-minded and selfish often only see the advantages and disadvantages that are directly related to them, immediate, superficial, not long-lasting and have great side effects; People with lofty aspirations, long-term vision, active thinking, extensive knowledge and pure and elegant interests will see the advantages and disadvantages of being more essential, longer-term, more real and free from adverse reactions.

How much is our dignity worth? After all, it depends on how we shape and evaluate ourselves. Some people work when they are paid, while others would rather do nothing if their wages are not in place. This is the difference in people's choices. Liu Chan's choice does not conform to his status and position, which directly reduces his overall pattern and quality.