After "no subsidy", the business of off-campus training market is booming. Why?

After the "no subsidy", the off-campus training market is booming. Mainly because only the form is prohibited, what is not "prohibited" is the demand. In other words, the "no supplement" has not reduced the demand for remedial classes. Why do students need to make up lessons?

Because the college entrance examination still exists, as long as the baton of the college entrance examination remains unchanged, the demand for off-campus training will not decrease. Education plays the role of social stratification. Whether the senior high school entrance examination is divided into secondary vocational schools, or continuing to attend ordinary high schools and then entering universities, they will face completely different employment prospects, which are often linked to social stratification. Under the influence of this selective baton for college entrance examination, it seems that whoever relaxes will suffer.

Some people say that the so-called "double reduction" is neither decompression nor burden reduction. Double reduction, one is to reduce the number of poor children, and the other is to reduce the number of parents who do not attach importance to education. To put it bluntly, no parents dare to give up their children's education easily in this competitive era. What they can teach themselves, of course, is to spend money to teach others. This is the practical demand of remedial classes.

The state has issued a policy that the compulsory education stage should be "double reduced", that is to say, the burden of homework and off-campus training should be reduced in primary and junior high schools. If everyone doesn't make up lessons and everyone is on the same starting line, then the selection of the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination is a natural elimination process. Only after the introduction of the policy will parents really feel at ease that their children will only attend classes on campus without supplementary subject training? This is unnecessary.

Discipline training institutions will certainly not do things that "double reduction" obviously cannot do, so the demand for make-up lessons after "double reduction" has only become more personal. The current high-end nanny market has actually turned the demand for remedial classes into a "private education" market.

Everyone saw that the school did not assign homework, take exams, test or rank, and no one knew how their children did in school. Entrusting children to schools and ignoring their parents is a strong parent. Everyone knows that behind this seemingly peaceful and harmonious teaching scene, there may be an undercurrent, each fighting its own way.

After "no help", the business of off-campus training market is booming. The root cause is that the college entrance examination is still there, and the demand for remedial classes is still there.