Mutual benefit and playfulness of the yearning circle

Mutual benefit and playfulness of the Simu circle

It is obvious from the title that the Simu circle is mutually beneficial and playfulness. There are two key words in today's content, mutual benefit and playfulness. Yes, it's my own word hhhh, but in the next article, I will explain the mutual benefit and playfulness of what I call the yearning circle as clearly as possible.

First of all, it's about mutual benefit. I accidentally saw a Si complaining, saying that if Si still has to take care of Mu's preferences, it's better to let Mu play with himself.

In fact, this person's point of view is very clear, that is, thinking is in control of desire. In his cognition, desire is on the side of pleasing while thinking is on the side of being flattered. Desire needs to listen to what he says and think, and it doesn't need to abide by so many rules. Even thinking itself is a rule. Personally, I don't comment on this view, but I want to talk about what I understand as the relationship of longing.

first of all, I firmly believe and always carry out that longing is equal, at least in personality. Why do you want to emphasize this point? I will bring it up when I talk about gameplay. I think the yearning activities based on the premise of equality of personality are long-term and healthy.

since we need to use the explanation of playfulness, let's talk about playfulness first.

let's first establish the general environment for our discussion, and then we can have the next discussion only after reaching a * * * understanding on this point. In other words, if you don't agree with this general environment, you don't need to read the next content.

This big environment is that before thinking about it, we were social people, and we had our own interpersonal relationship, social relationship and living environment. Only when these things are stable will we consider longing. That is to say, for us, longing is not just a need of life, but a icing on the cake.

For example, we will still live without sex, but this does not prevent us from having sex, which will indeed make us happier. The same is true for longing. Here, longing refers to the asexual pure longing game, which is why sex is used as a metaphor.

In short, yearning for most of us is the adjustment of life, that is, it is a game that makes us happy and a minority game in life.

The above is my view on the playfulness of longing. I think that before we have a stable life, we seldom think about making us stable through longing, but improving our quality of life through something we think is more serious and pragmatic.

Therefore, I think that for most people, longing is not so much a way of life as a way of playing, and it is still an activity for fun in essence.

There is a word mentioned above, Happy. In my previous article, I talked about the importance of delayed gratification in the process of longing, and also explained the reasons why longing gets happiness from what I think of longing.

In the relationship between thinking and longing, thinking is the master and longing is the controlled (dom and thinking ado are not subdivided here, so long as everyone can understand). In fact, one thing is very simple. No matter whether you think or admire, you will choose longing activities in order to make yourself happy.

That is to say, thinking only gains happiness by controlling this process, while longing gains happiness by obeying what you say and do. In this yearning relationship, two people get what they want and gain happiness at the same time, which is the basis for thinking to establish a relationship. Thinking without admiration, experiencing without, longing for the same reason.

since each other is indispensable to the other, they should be equal in terms of their power, which is also the reason why I said that personality is equal, and each needs what he wants, not really surrendering.

The reason why the game is a game is because we separate it from ordinary life. In reality, the only social animal in Nuo Nuo may become the owner waving a small whip. In reality, arrogant people may also become fawning little cute (? .? )

Everyone has his own other side, and longing gives us such an opportunity to release. In the process of participating in the game, two people feel satisfied because of each other's existence, which is a great process. However, the question also follows. When the requirement of thinking makes Mu begin to feel uncomfortable, can the relationship between thinking and longing be stable? I have a negative attitude towards this answer.

why? Since you are not the only one in this WordPress university, why don't I find a thought that makes me happy and spend it with you here? Once Mu really leaves this relationship, and the clear pointing performance in the circle allows him/her to quickly find the person who may be suitable for him/her, then at this time, the dominant position of thinking will no longer exist.

Therefore, I think that since the relationship between longing and admiration is mutually beneficial, it is also an inevitable requirement to respect longing. The so-called longing can be controlled by thinking. The bottom line is that when this longing is still willing to be your longing, your control will continue to exist. Once the other person disagrees with your thinking, control will become a joke.