Does the winner of WeChat voting really mean anything?

May your sadness and unhappiness be dissipated by the sunshine on a sunny day

In various activities or competitions organized by the school, there is definitely something like selection and evaluation, but the most frustrating thing is What’s the weirdest selection method that I hate? I think it is WeChat voting, and the final result is determined by the number of votes cast. I was confused, what is this kind of comparison? Isn't it a competition of ability and talent? How come it has become a competition of character and popularity?

I believe everyone is familiar with this phenomenon. It is basically a very common phenomenon. In fact, this is the case not only in schools, but also in many activities and competitions held in society. The number of votes determines the level of performance.

This is a terrible trend. Try to think of this scenario: In a school, the standard for judging teachers is not teaching qualifications or teaching performance, but the number of WeChat votes; in a hospital, the standard for judging the excellence of a doctor is not medical skills and medical ethics, not patient reputation, but WeChat The number of votes; even in some art competitions where children participate, the awards are not based on the children's real talents but rely on WeChat votes... In fact, these are very real scenes and very common in reality!

This has led to the whole society passing on a kind of abnormal value - it doesn’t matter whether you work hard or have talent, nor does it matter who you are. As long as you are popular enough, your parents and children will be friends. Do enough and you can earn the honorary status bonus. Think about how terrible this is!

I had this happen to me at school and was very disgusted by it! Not long ago, the school asked us to vote for a teacher, as if to select some model of moral standards. What I was thinking was, who is he? I don't even know him, so why should I vote for him? I don't know what good things he has done. What if he is not a good person? Then I don’t know, after all, I don’t know him! There is no benefit to voting, but the school forces us to vote and requires us to take screenshots! That’s too much!

Let me tell you a joke: If you don’t vote, I won’t vote. When will I, Li Yunlong, come forward? Such "magic phrases for canvassing votes" are no longer unfamiliar on the screen.

This kind of WeChat voting is indeed a good thing for the organizer, because it gets more attention and forwarding volume, and promotes a wave of popularity. But this is not necessarily the case for the participating parties. In order to canvass votes, the focus of the participating parties must not be on the competition, but on how to canvass votes.

No one cares about the excellent works, but the inferior ones are far ahead! Is it really fair to rely on the results of voting to determine the level of performance?

I have participated in some activities. When I learned that the selection was in this way, I did not take any action. I basically gave up because I knew that I could not compare.

If I really want to win, can’t I just buy tickets and swipe tickets? Isn't this more efficient? Therefore, the emergence of ticket fraud further undermines the fairness of the game! What do you compare to those first place winners with tens of thousands of votes? Being popular is not that exaggerated! And even if you win, what do you get? Did you really win the competition based on your own ability and talent? If not, then what's the point of winning?

This undercurrent of "canvassing" has taken a turn for the worse, fueled by competition for connections and comparisons. It’s more about satisfying vanity needs!

When I encounter this kind of voting behavior again, I will ignore it because I know it is meaningless...

／End.

Picture︱Source Network

Text︱Sorrow and Joy

"May your sadness and unhappiness be dispersed by the sunshine of a clear day."

Follow me!