University alumni association ranking

On October 25th, 65438/kloc-0, the website of the Alumni Association published the ranking of China University Alumni Association in 2022-a guide to volunteering for the college entrance examination. According to the list, Peking University won the first place in China University in 2022, successfully achieving "fifteen consecutive championships". Tsinghua University ranked second, Shanghai Jiaotong University ranked third, ranking the top three in a row; Zhejiang University ranks fourth, Wuhan University ranks fifth, ranking among the world-class universities, and China ranks in the top five. A very interesting and particularly contradictory list. This is its indicator system: some pictures are not clear, but we can see some indicators with high weight, namely: excellent alumni (20%), scientific research achievements (20%), high-level talents (15%), teaching quality (10%), and the rest are in10. Then there is such a sentence in its introduction: The netizen teased: How is our army ahead of Fudan and South China University of Technology? Let's see if this is a joke. It's interesting. The only advantage may be that Wu Da is ahead of Huake. The concept of ranking evaluation of China University by the Alumni Association has always been highly consistent with the national policy, strictly following the policy requirements of the Ministry of Education to clean up the "five dimensions", and the evaluation standards have the highest consistency with the national "double-first-class" construction monitoring system and effectiveness evaluation standards, and the discipline evaluation index system of the Ministry of Education. Its independence, innovation and foresight are ahead of other universities in China, and it has become a leader in the evaluation of third-party universities. Only hats, "only streets" corresponds to 15% of "high-level talents". Also, the loss of academic qualifications means that the performance is not high, which is not reflected in the indicators. Otherwise, let the broken "five dimensions" remain unchanged, and all five dimensions are appropriately given high weight. In addition, after reading this index system, I have some feelings: 1. The high proportion of "excellent alumni" is equivalent to the achievement of seniority, which is quite unfavorable to universities with advantages in emerging disciplines. Of course, after all, this is the university ranking of the Alumni Association, which is understandable.

2. The overall ancient ratio of scientific research is too high. The comprehensive weight of scientific research achievements, scientific research projects and scientific research bases accounts for 27%, while the corresponding parts of personnel training, teaching quality and disciplines and majors only account for 14%, which is almost scientific research. The fundamental task of semi-colleges and universities is to educate people, the party and the country, and to cultivate talents. Colleges and universities are not scientific research institutes, so we can't just look at their rankings.

Or just focus on scientific research strength.

3. The proportion of international influence is too low. What do you mean by "double first-class"? This is a world-class university and a world-class discipline. Its name should be international and global. International influence only accounts for 3%, which is the lowest among all indicators, which is very unreasonable.

4. There is also social service, which is one of the five important functions of colleges and universities, and its proportion is too low.