How flexible is the civil service examination?

The civil service examination is a two-way choice. Candidates have the right to apply for it, and the recruiting unit certainly has the right to refuse. It is not surprising that three candidates, including Huang Hong, were rejected by Qinghai Insurance Regulatory Bureau. Surprisingly, the reasons for refusing admission are somewhat untenable.

Huang Hong applied for a position of professional supervisor. Anyone with a little common sense knows that this is a purely technical post, which requires professional ability rather than communication ability. It's ironic to refuse to register on the grounds of introversion. In addition, items such as introversion and poor coordination should be tested in the interview, while those who are too young have been made clear as early as the time of applying for the exam. Their visit to the link will not only give people a feeling of "why not refuse", but also prove that the whole recruitment process has not been conscientious. It is extremely unfair to let candidates pay the bill because of the fault of the employer.

Most importantly, the purely subjective criteria such as introversion and poor coordination and communication skills are too flexible. If employers are allowed to use them as restrictive conditions at will, it is very likely to lead to uncertainty in civil service examinations. As the candidates questioned, "Will poor skin and poor figure be the reasons for refusing admission in the future?" Actually, this is not a joke. Before recruiting civil servants, there have also been incredible situations such as "breast symmetry". It can be seen that once the civil service examination is full of uncertainty, it will inevitably lead to the unlimited power of the recruiting unit, the candidates will be forced to an extremely weak position, and the fairness of the civil service examination and even the personal dignity of the candidates will disappear. Obviously, on the one hand, this will damage the credibility of the civil service examination, on the other hand, it will breed corruption in public examinations such as "radish recruitment".

Look at this event sincerely. If there is no violation in this recruitment, I think Qinghai Insurance Regulatory Bureau must be full of grievances in the face of overwhelming doubts. Since the civil service examination process has set up an inspection link in addition to the written test, interview and physical examination, and the result of the inspection is that three candidates, including Huang Hong, can't meet their own requirements, isn't it "meeting the requirements and standing up to supervision" to refuse admission? After all, personality and coordination ability are things that no one can say for sure-this is the biggest and most urgent problem to be solved in the current civil service examination: how to restrain those unfair behaviors that may "meet the requirements"?

The continuous exposure of civil service examinations directly leads to too many choices for employers. At best, this alienation of power may lead to a "cleanliness addiction" in employing people, hoping to attract competent talents in all aspects as perfect as possible. In the worst case, it may give birth to a deformed mentality, such as asking the applicant for an image and temperament unrelated to the position to satisfy the obscenity of power. To put it bluntly, this is an irrational expansion of power. The best way to limit this power expansion is to simplify the public examination process as much as possible and delete links that are too flexible and easy to be manipulated. For example, if there is an interview, the inspection link is completely unnecessary, so that the public examination can be determined from the uncertainty and the predictability and supervision of the examination results can be increased. Of course, there will be disadvantages, such as affecting employers to choose better talents, but any kind of examination and system can't be perfect. For the bottom line of fairness in public examinations, especially in the context of frequent scandals in public examinations, it is necessary to tolerate these defects.