Review of starting line

After carefully tasting a work, we can absorb new ideas, write a review and record our gains and efforts. Have you thought about how to write it? The following is a review of the starting line for everyone, hoping to help everyone.

The Starting Line 1 The film The Starting Line tells the story of a pair of Indian parents who chose a school for their daughter to perform "Three Movements of Meng Mu". Although the theme focused on the hot topic of choosing schools, it made many viewers laugh as soon as it was shown. Most of the audience said that the viewing process was very relaxed and enjoyable, and some viewers said that some plots suffocated them, not deliberately sensational, but had the power of empathy. Although the film involves realistic elements such as school selection, school district and entrance interview, the director chooses to present it in a relaxed comedy way, which not only reflects the reality in the film, but also shows the power of love from Indian couples, especially the plot of Raj and Tammy moving to the slum school district for their daughter's entrance, which is even more funny and sad. "I thought Indian movies were just burning and moving, but I didn't expect to be so happy." Some viewers also said that "The Starting Line" broke the lyrical routine of Indian movies. "Personally, I think it's good to watch wrestling! Dad and the mysterious superstar are funnier and closer to our reality.

It is understood that when the film "The Starting Line" was released in India, it caused discussion among the media and the audience, and its box office performance was comparable to that of "Mysterious Superstar" released in the same period. Even defeated the mysterious superstar in Filmfare, known as the "Indian Oscar", and Raj, played by irfan Khan, won the best actor award. Many viewers said that the role of the father in the film has temperature and thickness. "You are especially cute when you can't argue with your mother." "I have worked hard for my daughter and have a lot of skills, but I have not lost my conscience." Many parents who take their children to show feel that there are too few movies on this subject in China. "This is our true portrayal", "I didn't expect the children to like it very much" and "My child said that this is his heart, so I may have to reconsider his education". The film is highly recognized by young audiences and "can't help but make people think deeply". "Sometimes I am cornered in the workplace, just like my father (in the movie), but his choice really touched me."

When the film was shown, many viewers felt the anxiety of her mother Tammy and insisted on going to the best school to receive the best education. They think this is too similar to the current situation, and some young female audiences share their experiences. "I am really distressed when I think of my mother's failure in the senior high school entrance examination. The heroine played really well." In the film The Starting Line, the clown couple "crossed" from ordinary families to upper-class rich areas and slums in order to let their daughter receive the best education. In the process of her mother Tammy's repeated pursuit of "the best", she caused layers of jokes and thought-is the so-called best really the best for her children? Many viewers agreed with his father Raj's last speech that the reality is very strong and choosing a school is very important, but "what kind of person is more important" and Raj's sentence "If you are not a good person, then you can't be a good husband and father" aroused their strong recognition. Many young viewers felt the last positive energy choice of Dad Raj, saying that "it is very worrying, but it is warm, kind and has a bottom line".

At the same time, the display of the upper and middle-class rich areas and slums in the film also makes the audience have a lot of discussions about whether children should be poor or rich. Poor upbringing practices their will, while rich upbringing is an eye-opener. Young parents think that "only when parents can really feel this problem, it is difficult to choose", while unmarried viewers think that they should be fully prepared for being parents for the first time in the future. "If they can't be good parents, they can't set an example for their children." The discussion of personality education in the film is almost unanimous. "School education cannot replace family education" and "Personality education should follow the example of parents".

Comment on the starting line 2 The starting line once again carries forward the advantages that Indian films touch social pain points and criticize social reality. Different from the heavy theme of this film, the starting line connects the themes of unfair education, the gap between the rich and the poor, the chain of social discrimination, the goal of child training, the alienation of human nature with colorful colors and witty banter, and its ending is full of irony.

"The Starting Line" is well-behaved in narrative techniques, lens use and characterization, and the story is simple: a couple of "nouveau riche" try their best to get their children into school. But the fate of little people affects the whole society and brings a strong sense to the audience.

There is also a paragraph on the starting line: "In India, English is not only a language, but also a symbol of class." He also said: "Your daughter is the child of the clothing store owner and will definitely inherit her father's career in the future;" Our children are different. We must start a career after coming out, so we only speak English. " Listen, how light this passage is, as if the poor should be poor all their lives and rich forever.

The most funny thing about The Starting Line is that the protagonist's family took fake photos in a photo studio to show off their trip abroad in order to pretend to be rich. The punch line is the hero. At every critical moment, the street rage on men debunks the lies of "rich people". People always say that it takes three generations to train a real aristocrat. "The Starting Line" truly tells us that the brand left by family background and economic background can't be shaken off for a lifetime, and no lie can cover it up. It's like a hero who has never learned English. Even though he tried to look up the dictionary, his letters of recommendation were in a mess. Heroines and heroines who have never experienced the life of the rich, even if they are famous brands, are nothing like aristocrats.

What surprised me for the first time was that the film was not only satisfied with pretending to be rich, but also further explained that it was more difficult to pretend to be poor. As the line says: "The course of poverty cannot be learned in a day or two." Look at Indian society. The community of the rich is clean and tidy, with luxury cars and luxury houses. In poor communities, one foot can step on cow dung, mosquitoes are everywhere, and there is no water to flush the toilet. You have to grab water and eat rice by distribution. But both the rich and the poor regard English as a symbol of class, except that the rich welcome English while the poor strongly reject it.

"The Starting Line" strongly responded to these unfounded contempt with sharp contrast. Although the hero and heroine are rich, they do whatever it takes to get their children to go to school. They obtained the places of poor students in Delhi grammar school at the expense of forging poverty certificates, deceiving schools and sacrificing the qualifications of the poor.

In fact, the source of the joke in this film is essentially the different educational concepts of husband and wife, which is also the main reason why Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt divorced. The man insists that no matter which school, the key is to make children happy, and he disdains fresh educational ideas and teaching methods. The hostess is more practical. She believes that it is more important not to have a happy childhood, but to have a bright future and carry out high-intensity overage study. In short, on the one hand, we should let children develop with their personalities, on the other hand, we should pay attention to children's obedience and recognition. I think these two points can be considered. We always say to be a man before learning, but in actual teaching, teachers can't even speak knowledge well. How can we teach to be a man? The teacher pushed the responsibility to the parents, and the parents pinned their hopes on the teacher, and both ends failed, delaying the children. Fortunately, the couple finally reached an agreement. Faced with learning knowledge and class education, they still chose to make their children healthy and sunny.

At the end of the film, the sun is shining, and the hero and heroine lead their daughters out of the campus. Once they worked hard to enter this school, eating up the hardships of the poor and the fatigue of the rich, but today they are extremely relaxed. There are a group of people who get rich by power on campus, but there is a huge gap between the rich and the poor outside the campus. What can parents do and what can people do? I can only make my children happier. The carriage is full of smiling faces of children. Maybe they will never know that their life could have been another way, and this chill, in the warm sunshine, has become more biting.

Reflection on the starting line 3 Today, my wife and I went to the cinema to watch movies. That's great. The bad idea in this Indian film is obviously the story of us in China. The details in the film are staged in China almost every day, and even the name is China: The Starting Line.

The story of the film is not complicated at all: a pair of middle-class parents in an Indian clothing store, in order to let their daughter receive the best education and achieve a class leap (everyone who knows the Indian caste is very powerful), tried their best to enter the top schools in Delhi from kindergarten, so as to make great strides in the future, enter the best primary schools, junior high schools, high schools and universities, and then enter multinational companies to become elites in society. However, such schools only recruit high-quality children from India's truly wealthy class and a few poor families with a fixed number of places. So tiger mom and tiger dad embarked on a tortuous and long road to school choice.

At the beginning of the film, I felt overprotective, overprotective. The hostess should wear sunscreen and mosquito repellent when she takes her little host out to play, even if the little host says, "Mom, this is sticky." I still ignored it. When I got to the park, I kept telling the servants to pay attention to this and that. It is no exaggeration to say that children can make marionettes and are everywhere around us, including ourselves. For example, indoor potted succulent radish and so on. The vitality of outdoor landscape plants can never be compared. One is cultivated in a greenhouse, and the other is experiencing the scorching sun and wind and rain. We really need to take good care of it to grow better, but when you over-water and over-fertilize it. Lv Zhi was finally indirectly murdered. The most sincere love in the world comes from parents. It should be the role of caring, guiding, correcting and setting an example, rather than over-paying and over-protecting.

In the film, the economic strength of men belongs to the middle class, and their "physiological needs and security needs" are met, but their economic strength does not meet the "respect needs". At parties in Delhi school district, children will be puzzled or even joked because of funny dances, isolated because they speak Hindi, and disqualified from education because of the nature of their work. This kind of respect can't meet the demand, which makes people feel anxious, but what I want to say is that we must recognize our own value and give full play to our own value, so why should we care about the eyes of others and the words behind them? There is an old saying that "people are more important than self-respect."

The theme of this film is the Indian version of "Three Major Movements in Meng Mu". I moved several times in order to get my child into a prestigious school. It can be said that I did my best, and of course I finally got what I wanted. In today's society, we pay more attention to knowledge than moral education. The so-called "starting line" in our mouth is to hope that children will stand on the same starting line, thus ignoring the starting line of parenting. Our personal achievements and economic strength may not be improved, but I think the starting line of parents is the starting line of moral education, not material. For example, in Wang Sicong, when the son of the richest man in China entered the society, his father gave 500 million yuan, saying that he would go out and toss, and if he failed, he would come back to inherit the family business. Even if your child is at the starting line with him since childhood, you can't give him a future. The man in the film is a classic sentence, "I want to be a good father and husband, but I have to be a good person first." Yes! Only being a good person can bring children to the starting line of moral education in front of them. Most entrepreneurs in today's society were born in the sixties and seventies, and most of them are illiterate. They can't even write Tao Huabi's name. Therefore, we should attach importance to both knowledge and moral education. Moral education is the greatest wealth left by parents to their children, and it is also the basis for determining their future achievements. Campus, a pure land, should be innocent, but it is also inevitable. Parents should not only care about their children's achievements in school, but also care about their feelings.

I like writing, I have nothing to do, I like moaning without illness, and I want to write simple books. I hope to know more people who like words, and we can share each other's groans.

Reflective education on starting line 4 has always been a controversial topic, and the debate on "stocking" and "elite" education methods has never stopped. I watched the Indian film The Starting Line this winter vacation, and discussed their connotations, which made people think deeply.

Raj and Mi Tu are a middle-class Indian couple. At first, they thought that elite education could exercise outstanding competitiveness and seize opportunities in the fierce social competition mechanism. The formation of this concept is largely due to their personal experience. The couple have made small achievements in business, but as poor people, they don't know English and lack higher education. Wearing the hat of "nouveau riche", he was spurned by the upper class and was incompatible with the life of the upper class.

Raj, her husband, once questioned whether it was necessary to send her daughter to a prestigious school, but Mi Tu, her wife, was very excited and said, "We can't let Pia receive the education we received" because she felt that they could only stay in the middle class because they didn't receive a good education. Then she said that a good school can provide a good English education, and English in India is "not only a language, but also a symbol of class."

What impressed me was that Raj registered his daughter for the first time and lacked experience. As a result, many parents came to the queue early, and some even came at 12 in the morning. In order to ensure that the position is not taken away, she even sleeps on the spot. The fact is that no parents want their children to lose at the starting line.

There was no result in the queue, but Raj found a prestigious consulting agency at a high price and made various efforts according to the requirements of the consultant, but he was still not admitted to a prestigious school. Later, I heard that famous schools had places for children from poor families, so I pretended to be poor and moved to poor areas to be audited by investigators sent by famous schools. In the end, they got the quota as they wished.

But the saddest thing is Raj's poor neighbor. In order to make up for the extra-curricular activities charged by the school for his children, he had to risk his life to touch porcelain. This situation is of course extreme and even dramatic, but it does reflect that the poor are cornered in the competition for educational resources.

This situation also made Raj realize that he was depriving a poor child of the right to education. Later, Raj tried to correct his cheating behavior, donated money anonymously to public schools, offered to give up his children's status in prestigious schools, told his story publicly, and let his children drop out of prestigious schools and go to ordinary public schools. At the end of the film, we saw the long-lost relaxed smile on our daughter Pia's face. There is no constraint from parents in this smile, but a joy of regaining freedom.

My idea is that maybe many parents wholeheartedly want their children to receive the best education, but they are not. Not every child is suitable for learning, and not every child can receive the so-called elite education. It is unwise to blindly pursue academic Excellence. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude can better weigh the pros and cons. "Stocking" education is natural, but it does not mean indulgence. Proper letting go is an indispensable part of a child's growth.

Many times, the concept of education will be influenced by social orientation. Most schools and parents have a deep-rooted concept-to be a hero. What I say most is that other people's children get excellent grades. We often judge a student's Excellence by his grades in a limited way. In fact, education is not limited to achievements, but also includes the cultivation of moral character or morality. It is more appropriate for children to make their own choices than for their parents. There is more than one road in life, and every road is full of thorns, but every day the end of the road will be a different world.

Comments on "The Starting Line" 5 Recently, a family of three went to see the Indian film "The Starting Line", and the hot issues of school choice reflected by the film are believed to attract the attention of many parents in China. Whether it is necessary for ordinary families to send their children to famous schools, whether famous schools are flashy enough to satisfy vanity, and how to cultivate healthy, happy and kind children may all be answered in the film.

The film tells the story of a middle-class family in Delhi, India, trying their best to send their children to a prestigious school. The protagonist Raj is a fashion shop owner. Egged on by his wife, in order to let his young daughter go to a famous school, he moved his family to the rich area next to the famous school and tried to integrate into the rich circle. Raj paid a high price to the consulting agency that helped him go to a prestigious school, and made various efforts according to the requirements of the consultant, but he was still not admitted to a prestigious school. I heard that famous schools have places for children from poor families, so they pretended to be poor and moved to poor areas to be audited by investigators sent by famous schools. The Raj family can't integrate into the rich society because of their language and living habits, and it is difficult to integrate into the bottom society because of the difficult conditions, which makes many jokes.

The film not only shows the comparison, vanity and hypocrisy of the rich, but also vividly shows the diligence, simplicity, intelligence and kindness of the poor. The Raj family pretended to be poor, met the kind and hardworking Shyam family and got their selfless help. People watching movies know that Raj's family is not short of money, and the helper Shyam's family has been poor for generations, but they teach Raj to squeeze the bus, take him to work in the factory, pay him wages, and even touch porcelain regardless of his own life safety, and give him compensation to pay his children's tuition. As a result, poor Shyam's children didn't go to a prestigious school, but Raj's children did. Shyam also paid them to celebrate. When I saw this scene, my eyes were moist. Thinking of the book My Life at the Bottom by American writers Barbara and Allen Rick, it is written that the author plays the role of a poor man to experience the hardships and helplessness of the workers at the bottom. Compared with this film, I have a deeper understanding of the bitterness of the poor class.

The film also shows Raj's efforts to correct his deception, including donating money anonymously to public schools, going to prestigious schools to give up his children's school status, telling his story in public, and letting his children drop out of prestigious schools and go to ordinary public schools.

Parents, if they want to choose a famous school for their children, they must consider their own actual situation, and don't blindly compare and get tired of vanity.

After watching the movie, I have always been full of confidence in educating my children and began to reflect on my education. Recently, I read Yin Jianli's The Most Beautiful Education is the Simplest and Rousseau's Emile, and realized the importance of not interfering too much and letting children grow up by themselves. In the past, I always felt that I should tell my child more about life, help him analyze the pros and cons of things, and let him take fewer detours and understand things earlier. In fact, children of several years old often misunderstand or forget them quickly. Parents are very eager for education and feel that they have passed on their decades of life experience to their children. It is only wishful thinking that children should be better than themselves. Rousseau said in Emile that he didn't want to teach anything and wouldn't instill any great truth until Emile 12 years old. Perhaps some parents blindly put pressure on their children who seem to have excellent studies, good habits and special skills, but this child's autonomy, independence and creativity are almost stifled. It is hard to say whether he can grow up to be a useful person to society, let alone a healthy person in body and mind. It's time for hours, which is why it's not necessarily good.

Educate children to learn to govern by doing nothing and let go appropriately. I also wrote in my previous blog post that educating children is a bit like stock trading and investment. It takes three generations to make a gentleman. If parents don't have skills, they might as well practice patience and endurance, so that children can grow up slowly and can't toss. The film The Starting Line also conveys this view. Raj's daughter is carefully managed, but her growth is greatly restricted and it is difficult to associate with children of the same age. However, when she went to poor areas and ran around with a group of wild children, she learned what sharing and caring are, and what kindness and friendship are.

As Rousseau and Yin Jianli emphasized, family education would rather be too loose than too strict. The future of children is a vast world, not the warm hands of parents. Sooner or later, children have to experience and grow up by themselves.

The starting line comments 6 The annual entrance season is coming again, and the enrollment fever and school choice fever are also getting worse. And this phenomenon of competing for financial resources and connections between prestigious schools, especially private schools, can be described as unknown. Although there is no doubt about this practice, parents attach importance to their children's education.

Coincidentally, the craze for chasing famous schools can not be underestimated in India, and the film The Starting Line is a true portrayal of this craze. By describing the tortuous process of a hero and heroine's difficulty in entering school, this film highlights the views, analysis and pursuit of education, the most authentic thing.

The heroine's father in The Starting Line is a rich tycoon. Although he is rich, he is ostracized by the so-called "nobility" because he runs a fashion shop. Even if he moved to the city center and owned a mansion, he especially catered to the various living habits of the "nobles", such as what clothes to wear, what household appliances to put, and what wine to drink at parties, so that the heroine could smoothly integrate into the "nobles" group and make friends. Explain in the language of "nobility" that top schools are not allowed to speak Hindi, but only English. Only nobles can speak English, and only when they can speak English can they have the opportunity to enter foreign companies, institutions and units and get ahead. Otherwise, even if there is more money, it will only be inferior, and it will only stop in the service industry when it grows up. Seeing that her daughter was rejected by her peers, the heroine's mother did not hesitate to invest heavily in a well-known training institution in order to improve her daughter in all aspects in a short time. In addition, parents have also entered special training to sharpen their swords for parents who are about to go to school.

It's just that thousands of calculations are not as good as days. Although a lot of simulation exercises have been done, many so-called "advanced educational concepts" have been instilled. For example, when asked how to introduce the word "poverty" to children, the standard answer is "sharing". (Sharing is caring), but in the formal interview, the heroine fell out of the top five universities in Sunshan because of obvious "mistakes" such as her father's standard answers. I really can't bear to give up the opportunity to go to a famous school. By chance, the heroine's parents learned that every famous school would allocate 5% places to poor students. So, in order to keep their children from losing at the starting line, they tried their best to move to poor areas and pretend to be poor families. At first, life hit a wall everywhere, and they were in a bad situation at any time. Fortunately, they got the seeds of good neighbors. This kind of help makes the verification stage of "poor students" pass smoothly.

Dramatically, the entrance opportunity stolen by the heroine belongs to the little partner who plays and studies together-the hero. The hero's father even risked his life to rush to the car on the road to help the girl "raise money for extracurricular activities", in order to save the girl's reading opportunity with the pension he got from his bloody arm. Later, the heroine's father suddenly realized that the real education is not whether the school is as luxurious as a five-star hotel, nor whether there are many politicians and celebrities in this school, but whether the teachers and students in this school maintain a childlike heart and treat their peers as family. Even if life is hard, they will not give up their love for life, look forward to the future, and bravely break out of their own world in a aboveboard way.

This film takes the heroine as the bright line and the hero as the dark line. Through the twists and turns of the hero and heroine's admission, it satirizes the so-called educational fairness in society and becomes the victim of power and money transactions. Finally, the heroine's family was infected by the behavior of the hero's family. In fact, it is not just the heroine's family that is infected, but everyone who is a parent and cares about education. People will always be humiliated and abandoned by rhetoric and intrigue. Courage and love are the foundation of their foothold. Let's pursue our dreams with a pure heart!