A woman in Shanghai had a free lunch in the supermarket. What do you think of this lady's practice?

In the supermarket, we often see many tasting products, some fruits, some cupcakes and even some drinks. Everyone is welcome to taste them for free. However, in Shanghai, a woman took a supermarket to try lunch, and many netizens also argued about it. Some people think that merchants actually provide tasting, so that we can eat more and eat less. Others think that tasting is enough, but I think the woman's practice is enough.

The reason why merchants let customers try it for free is to drain water. If everyone treats it as a free lunch, then first of all, the tasting provided by the merchants is definitely not enough, and secondly, it will affect the experience of others. The so-called tasting is to let everyone try, so you have to be aware of this problem on your own initiative, and you can't have no sense of morality and thick skin. It is actually very unreasonable to regard the tasting in the supermarket as your own thing.

In addition, the amount of food provided is inherently small. If you eat them all by yourself, other customers in the back just can't eat them. If you go too far, the merchant may not provide this service in the future. We should not bind a person by law, but demand a person by morality. Although this woman didn't violate the law, she violated a basic morality. We can eat a little, but not too much.

I also think this woman is a bit insatiable, mainly because she has taken advantage of the business. Although the merchant is hiding blood for you to eat, there is a little weight and time limit in the invisible condition. Although it has not been announced to the public, everyone can understand it. This lady's behavior may also undermine professional ethics. If more people imitate this woman in Shanghai in the future and try their best to eat it as lunch, it will certainly cause more trouble, although they feel this woman.