How to write about 100 words for college students' final self-appraisal?

If college students identify themselves at the end of the term, you can write down what you have learned this semester, what achievements you have made in your study and what shortcomings you have. These can be used as self-identity and then written into it.

self-assessment

First, the cornerstone of self-identity: information screening and processing

In order to make a more realistic self-assessment and a relatively correct strategic and tactical arrangement, the first thing to do is to subtract information instead of adding it. From your manners, I still see the thirst for information and the fear of missing key information. What you lack is information processing ability. A student told me the other day that the number of students in our school's new enrollment professional catalogue has been reduced by half, which is a great advantage, because competitors are afraid to apply, and I have not understood his brain circuit for a long time. Lack of information processing ability, addiction to information collection, better being surrounded by information, fear and anxiety, worse self-evaluation and strategic arrangement based on wrong information, on the contrary, postgraduate entrance examination has become a kind of performance.

Therefore, the cornerstone of self-assessment is the screening and processing of information. For the simplest example, "there are * * days before the senior high school entrance examination" is a typical invalid information, which has no substantive meaning except to increase anxiety, so you should turn a blind eye. In the middle and late stage of postgraduate entrance examination, irrational factors (chicken soup and chicken blood) play a weak role, while rational factors play a strong role. Really effective information can only come from three aspects: the first aspect is the proposer or rulemaker, mainly the target colleges and the examination center of the Ministry of Education, the second aspect is the real competitor, and the third aspect is yourself.

The effective information in the first aspect includes: the enrollment professional catalogue of the target college (examination subjects, the number of students enrolled except the entrants), the real questions and designated reference books of the professional courses of the target college, the examination outline and examination analysis published by the examination center of the Ministry of Education. Typical examples of invalid information include: how to find a relationship or contact a tutor during the initial examination, what the brothers and sisters who have not passed the examination said (especially about whether the school is exclusive), the new syllabus released by the examination center of the Ministry of Education is interpreted at will (the most typical one is completely changed, causing panic), and there is no hot spot supported by the outline examination center. What you really need to pay special attention to is whether there are substantial changes in the examination subjects of specialized courses (changes in the whole examination subjects) and whether the number of students enrolled has decreased significantly (more than 1/3). If you have both, don't say anything. The most important strategic and tactical arrangement we have to make is to transfer.

The second effective information includes: the actual review progress and review effect of competitors. Typical examples of invalid information: all kinds of listening and speaking (for example, I reviewed the second round, brushed the questions several times, slept from 6 am to night 1 1, and how many points did I get in the real questions). We don't rule out several formidable opponents, but if the real opponents are all such gods as you think, then we can all wash and sleep. If you really want to know about your competitors' exam preparation, you can use one of the core test sites in the real questions, such as Ma Yuan's review. Two questions are enough. The first one is "What is the essential difference between humans and animals" and the second one is "What is the relationship between relative surplus value and wages", pretending to ask questions. Real gold or parallel imports, you will know if you try.

The effective information in the third aspect includes: effective review duration, plan implementation ratio and review achievement conversion rate. Typical of invalid information: Today, I have degenerated again, with low efficiency and weak willpower. I have read the book several times and brushed the questions several times.

In fact, the feedback information in self-review is the most important information source for evaluation, but this most important information source is usually ignored by us, or directly covered by vague judgments such as weak will, low efficiency and insufficient understanding. Effective review duration refers to the accumulation of time when the concentration duration exceeds 15 minutes and the interruption is not more than twice within 1 hour (more than 5 minutes). For example, I have nothing to do all day today, but I take a nap until 9:45. In fact, my effective working time in the morning is about 1 hour and 40 minutes. Sleep until 3: 40 in the afternoon, work until 7: 00, and walk the dog in the middle. The actual effective working time is 1 hour 50 minutes, and my effective working time in a day is 3.5 hours, not the expected 8 hours. The implementation ratio of the plan is calculated according to the test center or the amount of questions. For example, if the original plan recites 5 test sites, but only 3 test sites are actually recited, then the implementation rate of the plan is 60%. The conversion rate of review results is not evaluated every day, but after a fixed period of time. For example, after learning a chapter on politics, the correct rate of doing real questions and 1200 questions represents the conversion rate of review results.

Second, self-assessment and coping.

Self-assessment is based on the effective information of the above three aspects, but the order is slightly different. The first thing to compare is your own review feedback information, which is the third aspect mentioned above. The criteria are: the effective review duration is more than or equal to 5 hours, the plan implementation ratio is more than or equal to 60%, and the conversion rate of review results exceeds 50% (slightly different in each subject). If these three indicators are achieved, I think there is no problem from the perspective of self-review, so there is no need to be surprised.

If the effective review time is less than 5 hours, it needs to be corrected by external forces, such as special supervision. It is ineffective to rely on self-blame. If you are in the study room for a long time and the effective review time is not up to standard, you should consider shielding the source of temptation, such as mobile phones. If you are a student who has hardly started reviewing during the summer vacation, your standard is not 5 hours, but 8 hours. Don't think that five hours is short. You really need five hours of effective review time. At least 7-8 hours of this day will be spent in the study room. And with the passage of time, the pressure increases, and the effective review time will also increase. In June, it will reach 7-8 hours in 5438+ 10, and in February, it will reach 10 at most. 10 hour is basically the upper limit of a normal person's effective review time, so don't expect it to exceed 10 hour. If the implementation ratio of the plan is less than 60% and the effective review time reaches the standard, then it must be unrealistic and there are too many tasks. Some students told me that if you don't do so much, you can't finish reviewing. It seems that if you do too much, you can finish reviewing. If you can't complete your own review tasks in the actual review time, you can only compress your review tasks and think about which review tasks are life-and-death and which are imaginary. If you, in turn, ask yourself to stay awake or improve your efficiency according to your imaginary review task, it can only be wishful thinking of subjective idealism. Some students told me that we can't compress it, and every test center is the focus. I want to ask, really? Every word? It comes down to a deep-rooted laziness, unwilling to think, analyze and delete invalid test sites or invalid parts of effective test sites. Learning without thinking is useless. That's what students do. As for the conversion rate of the result, it is easier to be ignored. First, it is troublesome to evaluate, and second, it is afraid to face its real review effect. No matter how troublesome it is to review the evaluation of the conversion rate of grades, how can we know what is fallacy and truth without doing it, and how can we turn fallacies into truth without being exposed? You think you can do well in the exam after you finish studying. Joke, after you finish learning, you just get an understanding from practice. This understanding needs to be tested by practice, and the evaluation of conversion rate is such a practice. Real questions and simulation questions consistent with real questions are the best test criteria for conversion rate. If the conversion rate is low, stop to see if there is any directional problem in the review. If the conversion rate is above 50%, it is only a technical problem, and the general direction is right.

The second aspect of self-assessment is to compare the information of proponents or rulemakers. Up to now, you must have an ideal primary school in your mind, but it doesn't mean that life belongs to this school, and death is the ghost of this school. In fact, the schools I attended at all stages were not my favorite schools. When I entered the university, my favorite schools were Nanjing University and Fudan University. I liked the historical and geographical center of Fudan University when I took the postgraduate entrance examination, and I liked Kyoto University when I took the postgraduate entrance examination. Even postdoctoral students originally wanted to go to the War Department of King's College London. Therefore, when you find that this school has shrunk or completely changed the examination subjects of professional courses, you should bravely adjust the school. I was told that specialized courses are different. Unless there are few schools, you can generally find schools with similar professional courses, not to mention those majors that need to be unified. Don't trust adjustment. Adjustment is artificial, you are a fish, and some schools are nothing. When adjusting, you have to be 985,211. What can you do? The fairness of adjustment is far less than the first choice.

The last aspect of self-assessment is to compare competitors' information. In this respect, I think many students imagine their competitors as gods. Let me talk about politics. What is the political average of your competitors? They bought a bunch of teaching AIDS and taught themselves. They found that Ma Yuan was a pile of long and difficult sentences, Mao Zhongte was a word game, and Shi Gang had recited them, so they shelved them. Now they are especially looking forward to the change of the whole outline, laughing at all your futile review, and finally got several sets of papers, but they still can't finish reciting them. Don't take this as comfort. I never comfort my students. This is based on rational certainty. It definitely kept me slow, as if nothing had been left behind.