The United States is capitalist, so doesn't voting in the presidential election reflect the concept of civil rights?

First of all, the candidates for the US presidential election will not be poor and ordinary people, but only among bourgeois politicians. Although the U.S. Constitution stipulates that people who have American citizenship 15 years or more and have reached the age of 35 can run for the presidency of the United States, the media is controlled by capitalists. You can't run without money. How can you run without advertising?

Secondly, the voter turnout rate in the US presidential election is not high, generally around 60%, which means that a small number of people who have the right to vote don't vote at all, so it is probably meaningless to know whether to vote or not.

Third, the president of the United States is not directly elected by voters, but the electoral votes system. For example, there are 25 electoral votes in state A. If Zhang San gets a narrow majority in that state, he will get these 25 votes. In another state, Zhang San may lose the election and lose 19 votes in another state. By analogy, there may be that the total number of voters who support Zhang San is less than that of Li Si, but Zhang San is elected because whoever gets more electoral votes will be elected, not whoever supports more voters will be elected.

That year, Bush and Gore, the first two, got almost the same electoral votes. Finally, because the electoral votes of a small state are determined by the voting results of thousands of voters, who is elected president. This is a major international joke. The recount, the debate and litigation of overseas soldiers' votes have reached the US federal court. The whole world is watching the big joke of this so-called most democratic country.

It's just that the American system is relatively perfect, and it pays more attention to protecting some rights and interests of ordinary people, which confuses many people's sight.