Debate: I am opposed to whether the phenomenon of not giving up your seat is a personal problem or a social problem.

Once upon a time, I saw an old man with gray hair and shouted, Come and sit with me. Then a busload of people smiled at you and the old man thanked you again and again. What a wonderful scene.

Later, a reporter who played computer all night and had no material to hand in was depressed and terrified on the bus. Because there was no place to stand, he suddenly wanted to get back at the people on the bus. He saw an old man standing without a seat, so he took a picture of the old man standing in the middle of the empty bus, and the stool next to him was full of passengers. Then he stood at the highest moral point of the newspaper and condemned all the people sitting on the bus. Reprinted by many newspapers and websites, it aroused strong repercussions and was widely discussed.

Later, the wonderful scene was hard to see. But a strong man like a Tibetan mastiff, who asked a sick young man for a seat for the puppy in his wife's belly and killed someone else's nose.

Instead, an old man as strong as a Tibetan mastiff on the subway bit the other person with blood all over his face when he asked for a seat.

There was a funny conversation between two old people in the newspaper recently. Two old people are in the car with only one empty seat. An old man humbly asked another person to sit down, and another old man said that I would sit where you sat. The old man said that the car was full of seats, and I could sit wherever I wanted. The whole car was silent.

A joke was posted on the Internet. The old man asked for a position and was refused. The old man said with great quality and morality: Hum, my today is your tomorrow. I smiled at the news. Yesterday was when you were young. When you take the bus, you queue up by strength. Today, it is normal for you to ask for your seat in the name of morality. Your yesterday is your today.

When did the seat become an important seat? When did a beautiful and noble moral event become that when people want seats, they can grab them in the name of morality!

There is only one Lei Feng. If everyone is forced to be Lei Feng, no one will agree. Seating is queuing, and grabbing seats is immoral. In the name of morality, asking others to "give up their seats" is to grab seats and jump the queue!

Ask those reporters and the media to pat cars and luxury cars more when they have time. They all have news, dig deeper and explore their society more healthily. And those of us who take the bus can't afford to get hurt.

and

Come on, friends who have become Spider-Man, Batman and mad dog with a little sense, morality is not a law, not everyone must abide by it, and it is not illegal. Giving up your seat is a virtue, and not giving up your seat is not immoral.

I remember once on TV, advanced individuals gave prizes, and the first, second and third prizes all had bonuses. As a result, the first prize and the second prize were donated immediately. Seeing such an example, the third prize had to be donated with a sad face. So what if you don't donate! A person should not be kidnapped by morality. Kidnapping people's morality is pseudo-morality.

Public morality refers to the morality that everyone is fair and abided by in public places for the common interests of everyone. Giving up one's seat has nothing to do with public interest or fairness. It is unfair even to those who occupy seats at the expense of others.

Giving alms to beggars is one's freedom. When a beggar holds a bowl and sticks it to your face and fiercely asks you for money, he is willing to give it not to a noble person, but to a coward.

Finally, this law is not clear, and it is a bit strange to launch a moral trial where the spirit of contract is not perfect.