Should a wonderful debate give money to beggars? composition

Should a wonderful debate give money to beggars? A beggar came to a yard and begged from the hostess. The beggar is very poor. It's sad that the whole arm is broken with the right hand and the empty sleeves are dangling. Anyone who meets him will give generously. But the hostess rudely pointed to a pile of bricks in front of the door and said to the beggar, "Please help me move these bricks to the back of the house."

The beggar said angrily, "I only have one hand, and you still have the heart to ask me to move bricks!" " I don't want to give alms, so why play tricks on people. "

The hostess was not angry and bent down to lift the brick. She moved it with only one hand and said, "Look, you can work without two hands. I can do it, why can't you? "

The beggar was stunned. He looked at the woman with strange eyes, and the pointed Adam's apple slid up and down like an olive. Finally, he leaned down and raised the brick with one hand. He can only move one piece at a time. It took him two hours to move all the bricks. He was panting like a cow, his face was dusty, and several locks of hair were wet with sweat and stuck to his forehead.

The woman handed the beggar a white towel. The beggar took it and wiped his face and neck carefully. The white towel turned into a black towel.

The woman handed the beggar 20 yuan money again. The beggar took the money and said gratefully, "Thank you."

The woman said, "You don't have to thank me. You earned it yourself. "

The beggar said, "I won't forget you." Leave this towel for me as a souvenir. " With that, he bowed deeply and set off.

Many days later, another beggar came to the yard. The woman led the beggar to the back of the house and pointed to the pile of bricks and said to him, "If you move the bricks to the front of the house, I will give you twenty yuan." The beggar with sound hands walked away disdainfully, not knowing whether it was because he despised the twenty dollars or something else.

The woman's child asked her mother inexplicably, "Last time you asked beggars to move bricks from front to back, this time you asked beggars to move bricks from back to front." . Do you want to put bricks in the back or in front of the house? "

His mother said to him, "the bricks in front of the house are the same as those in the back, but whether they are moved or not is different for beggars."

After that, several beggars came, and the pile of bricks moved back and forth in front of the house several times.

A few years later, a decent man came to this yard. His suit and tie are different, just like those successful people who are confident and self-respecting. The fly in the ointment is that this man has only one left hand and his right hand has empty sleeves.

The bearer leaned forward, grabbed the old hostess in one hand and said, "Without you, I would still be a beggar, but now I am the chairman of a company."

The woman can't remember who he is and simply says, "You did it yourself."

The one-armed chairman wants to move this woman and her family to live in the city, be a city dweller and live a good life.

The woman said, "We can't accept your care."

"Why? I have bought you a house. "

"Because everyone in our family has two hands."

The chairman insisted sadly, "Madam, you let me know what a person is and what a personality is. That house is the reward you deserve for educating me! " "

The woman smiled: "Then give the house to someone who doesn't even have a hand."

A wonderful composition debate 100 words On Friday afternoon, the bell rang for the last class, and a spiritual debate began.

Party A: Group I and Group II. Argument: It is not necessarily beneficial to open books. Party B: Groups 3 and 4. Argument: Opening books is beneficial. Moderator: Teacher Wu.

The debate began, beginning with Xu He. As soon as Xu Qiuzhi finished, I raised my hand and said, "Liu Xiang said: books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, they have two functions: first, good medicine will cure diseases; The second is a poison that can kill people. " No sooner had I finished than there was a round of warm applause.

After that, the two sides refused to give way to each other and got angry.

Wang Yunduo said a reason, and the other party was silent. At this time, we thought we had won and were in high spirits. Just then, on the other hand, Deng Qiyu rushed out like a dark horse. In this way, Deng Qiyu and Wang Yunduo launched a fierce war of words. At the same time, the enemy and his comrades below are like a hungry wolf, greedily absorbing their knowledge.

Because it is very easy to say that it is good for you to open a book, there are more and more reasons for the dark horse Deng Qiyu. They refuel and run like cars, so the formation is getting bigger and bigger. And we are like a gas-guzzling car, which obviously lacks horsepower and is finally crushed by them. At this time, I remembered a sentence from Ding Li in Little Adults of Naughty Ma Xiaotiao: We should despise the enemy strategically and attach importance to the enemy tactically.

After a while, Mr. Wu stopped and said, "Because of time, the debate is over!" " No sooner had Mr. Wu finished than we asked noisily, "Who won?" "draw."

In this debate, I learned a lot, and I also thank Wang Yunduo and Deng Qiyu for bringing us such a spirited and fierce war of words!

A wonderful debate, the composition is 450-500 words. I think surfing the Internet is a double-edged sword with many benefits: 1. We can learn something we don't know online; 2. We can make many good friends here to help us study better; 3. We can also play games properly. Last year, the Ministry of Culture of China adopted 1 1 online games suitable for minors. .....

There are also many shortcomings, such as 1. There is still a lot of bad information on the internet, which will affect the physical and mental health of minors; 2. Inadvertent friends, the consequences are unimaginable; Online games are really changeable, with everything, most of them are "fighting and killing" and so on, which are not suitable for minors to contact. .....

It is not an absolute thing for primary and secondary school students to surf the Internet. It is important to grasp the scale.

Debate: Should beggars be given alms? I am debating psychology: the theory of cognitive disharmony. If your cognition in your mind is a person who helps others when they are in trouble, but your behavior is not like this, then your cognition will change and eventually you will become an indifferent person. If everyone does this, the impact on society will be enormous and the education of the next generation will be disastrous.

Economics: As a member of society, you have the responsibility and obligation to help members of society. But when you find that a member may make money by begging, you need to make an ideal judgment. First, whether the other party really needs help, if it is impossible to judge, then consider what consequences it will lead to if it really needs help, and whether it will lead to its death. If he dies, the cost to society will be psychological counseling, corpse disposal, immunization and health expenses, funeral arrangements, etc., far greater than the cost of helping him. Therefore, we must help him.

International relations: Under such circumstances, will foreigners notice, will it affect their views on China people, and will it lead to a chain reaction, such as distrust in trade, estrangement between military cooperation and non-governmental cooperation, and so on.

Debate: Should beggars give alms? The opposing view is that beggars should not be given alms.

I thought of it myself. )

Charity is not charity, it depends on the national conditions and the situation of contemporary society. If the society is new, has the other party ever given alms to all beggars? Have you ever thought that this man may be a liar?

Although many beggars can't say anything now, it seems that beggars have become a profession and an organization that tests people's conscience. Our charity will spoil them, make them rely on them, and make them mistakenly think that even if they don't work, they will still live on charity. People's inertia is terrible. Is this the way to corrupt them?

Secondly, I want to deny that they beg because they are helpless and helpless. If you don't have brain and knowledge, you can rely on physical strength. Even if you are moving bricks and disposing of garbage, if you don't even have physical strength, you should turn to the country and find a community to find a street office. The state is disabled for those who have no physical strength or brain power (disabled, most beggars are disabled! ) will give a certain policy, I don't believe that they don't gamble or smoke, and why do they beg if they can't get back the benefits! Because they will get more money by begging! Why do they beg for more money? ! Because we gave it to you! We are used to it! We made them think so! Is this good? If this goes on, there will be more and more beggars. You can help one person, but not everyone! We can't let half of the society try to feed the other half! There is no obligation and no need, it should be the efforts of the whole people, even if it is a little strength! Isn't it?

Of course, it may be confusing not to give them charity at first, but this is a social problem that needs us to correct slowly, from one to many, rather than getting worse!

Regarding whether beggars should be given alms, the focus of the debate is in two aspects: from the perspective of human nature, we should be sympathetic to others, and no matter how cold the society is, our hearts should be soft.

What you shouldn't say: there are special relevant units and departments to manage the management of beggars. Our kindness may encourage their dependence. In the long run, it will stifle their enterprising spirit.

In fact, in today's society, if you don't tell a lie, it's really hard to stand on your feet. You can still tell some lies without hurting others. Of course, if you can't lie, then don't lie. After all, you have to live a real life.

Is it good for a wonderful debate to open the book?

I remember that I used to see big brothers and big sisters fighting each other on TV, talking to the public in Kan Kan, and being personable. Unexpectedly, today, I can also board the debate field and participate in the debate competition like my big brother and big sister.

This afternoon, I came to school early and my classmates were very excited. What is the theme of this debate? I'm thinking silently. The crisp sound of class * * * rings in the expectation of the students. The students flew into the classroom like birds. The debate began with the applause of the students. I saw two players sitting on both sides of the podium, and the opposite players sitting on the left. Under the leadership of Niu Zhenyu, Xie Juyuan is behind the house, and Niu Wan Li, who is logical and good at theory, and Chen, who is full of imagination and quick thinking, are natural. Their argument is: "With computers, you don't need to spend time practicing calligraphy." On the right is the diamond player. Chen Zhuo, who emphasizes facts, values, and Chu Chu, and of course the author Li. Our debate topic is: "With the computer, we still need to practice hard." The debate began in a cheerful and lively atmosphere.

The first is the statement. The two sides took turns to clarify their views. I saw that Niu Zhenyu, the opposing party, stood up unhurriedly and clearly expounded the opposing party's point of view. This unstoppable momentum shows the veteran's calmness and makes many of our players "daunting"

After the presentation, the most wonderful free debate began. I was the first to grab the right to speak and asked the other person, "What homework do you usually do?" I think the other person will definitely say "pen" when he hears my question, and then I can use it as a stronghold to refute it. Who knows that the other party avoided answering and asked aggressively: "Remember the last time I asked you to get a line, why didn't you write it by hand and type it on the computer? Doesn't this explain the benefits of computers? " I was shocked and fell into an awkward position. The other party put me in a dilemma with an example of personal experience. So I stood up and said hesitantly, "If you hadn't asked me to make a phone call last time, I wouldn't have used the computer." Although I say so, I am utterly confused. I know I'm unreasonable. Look at the students who support us. They all held their breath and were very nervous. Of course I'm more nervous. The surrounding air seems to have solidified. If the other person keeps asking, I'm dead.

Fortunately, the other party did not ask, but the overall situation has been difficult to change. The opponent's "hand-to-hand combat strategy" made us "defeated like a mountain." Had to "retreat to the mountains to fight guerrilla warfare." Even "burying a few mines" and "digging a few traps" occasionally pose no threat to the enemy. The other side "fought more and more bravely", and countless factual arguments and personal experiences, like countless nuclear bombs, fell into our position. We can't organize a strong counterattack. The enemy is about to break through the position. Our team members are in dire straits. The computer is really good. How to deal with it? I carefully analyzed the current situation, like being poured with cold water, and immediately woke up. The topic that the pros and cons have been arguing about has little to do with the topic that should have been debated. Even if the computer is very good, but the handwriting is also very good, do you still need to practice handwriting? So I took this as a breakthrough and launched a "large-scale counterattack." "The other side is like the German army of the Soviet Union" and "falls apart" in an instant. A few attacks are as ethereal as punching from a distance It has no effect on the overall situation. Later, the other party finally established its "status" in the second line. However, we seized the flaw and made an "Incheon landing". The other side tried hard to "break through" and lost more than half. Fortunately, Chen's reinforcements arrived in time and the opposite side was "saved". Almost became 1945 Japan.

The situation on the field has undergone subtle changes, but the good times did not last long, and soon the two sides began a tug-of-war of positions. Niu Zhenyu, red-faced and eloquent, is sometimes witty; Sometimes he retorts. Established a "strong bunker". Not to be outdone, we built the Great Wall of Wan Li. Dig a "10,000-meter-long trench". The two sides are in a tit-for-tat stalemate. No one can convince anyone and no one can refute anyone. The audience under the stage is in high spirits and can't wait. Their expressions change with the change of the stage, from euphoria to excitement; Hold your breath for a while and give the players a sweat. ...

Finally, the teacher ordered that the free debate was over. The two sides ended the "battle" with a draw. The contestants have some unfinished business. But for the time limit, the debate would never have ended.

An argument is over. In the debate, the students enlightened their thoughts, increased their knowledge, improved their self-cultivation and sharpened their eloquence. Based on society, participating in competition is a reality that everyone has to face. An excellent speaker is undoubtedly a successful career.

Should students be invited to do their own composition homework on their birthdays? As for whether to invite classmates for your birthday, it depends on your family situation.

Just inviting some close friends.

No matter what the result is, it is important that we dare to stand up and express our views and exchange ideas with our classmates on the same issue, so that generate can spark his thoughts. I think many students have benefited from it, not only now but also in the future.