Also a newspaper group, why didn't Durant choose to join the Cavaliers?

The two biggest stars in the league today are Durant and James. James was the FMVP in 20 16, and Durant was the FMVP in 20 17. They were the best stars in the second decade of 2 1 century.

Durant and James are similar, too. Both of them decided to leave their parent team and join the giants, and successfully won the championship and got FMVP. Both of them have been questioned, and the same experience is for fans to compare.

Back to 20 16, if Durant joined the Cavaliers who won the championship this year, what would the current alliance pattern be like?

We all know that Durant and James are both small forwards, and James has been pushing Durant to stay at the FMVP of small forwards. In the 20 16 season, the Cavaliers chased three games in a row when they were 3- 1 behind, making the warriors who won 73 games the biggest joke. Then Thunder leader Durant, who was reversed by 3-/kloc-0-0 in the Western Conference finals, chose to join the Warriors who were reversed by 3-/kloc-0-0.

Then, if you switch to the Cavaliers, the Cavaliers will also have Super Four, Owen, Durant, James, Love and TT. Think about it, this lineup is more horrible than the Warriors. Owen is better than Curry in the playoffs, and Durant and James can beat the Warriors. There is no need to doubt.

But I'm glad that didn't happen. If so, the NBA will become a monopoly. James and Durant are recognized as the first and second, plus Owen, the top ten in the league. Are you familiar with it? Yes, it's the Big Three of the Heat. That year, it was also the top three for James and Wade and the top ten for Bosh. Durant's joining the Cavaliers is good for himself and bad for James.

What do you think of the above? Talk about your own ideas, welcome comments and messages.