Is the Indian army calling itself the fourth in the world a bluff?

This statement by the Indian army must be a bluff. Just look at the joke. After all, India initially claimed to be the third largest Indian army in the world, but it turned out to be an education for our army. And if you really want to say which army is the fourth in the world, this quota must belong to India. After all, France and Britain haven't spoken yet. What happened to India? I am afraid that the daily training of the Indian army can only be described as wonderful. For example, one of the training subjects of the Indian Navy is yoga. As for weapons and equipment, the tradition of the Indian army is to buy all equipment. As a result, if an Indian combat team has 10 people, then these combined weapons will even exceed 5 calibers. That's why I said that the Indian army's announcement was a bluff.

? 1, India's military spending is high, but the Indian army's combat effectiveness is not necessarily strong. To be honest, I don't agree with this view. Because I have never seen any army fight outside the chart because it bought more equipment. I know someone will tell me about the Israeli army, but Israel has a complete military industry system and a lot of domestic equipment. The equipment bought is just a supplement. But in the Indian army, most of the equipment is bought. For example, Xiao Ming works in a company. He reads chicken soup crazily every day, and then constantly inspires himself. Can we say that Xiao Ming's performance is very good? I can only say that Xiaoming's reading speed is very high.

The same is true of the army. Buying equipment can really improve combat effectiveness, but it can't be said that all the imported equipment will make the combat effectiveness ridiculously high. And they are all imported equipment, so there is no way to guarantee logistics. Besides, buying equipment to fight, this operation is not lasting. I don't know how many people still remember the Falklands naval battle. The Argentine air force sank and injured many British warships with flying fish missiles, and its record was not brilliant. But what happened when Britain cut off the supply of Argentine flying fish missiles? The Argentine air force ran out of food, which only allowed pilots to risk their lives to raid British warships. Although it paid a heavy price, it did not achieve much, not as good as several flying fish missiles at the beginning of the war.

This example is the same for the Indian army. Do you think Russian T-90 works well? What should I do once Russia stops selling to you during the war? Or use Arjun tanks and dead horses as living horse doctors. Or go to Ukraine to buy some T-72. However, the quality of T-72 produced in Ukraine has been verified by Iraq. So sometimes, the combat effectiveness of an army with a very high military expenditure is not necessarily high.

? 2. Too many weapons are bought, and the logistical pressure is great. The logistics problem in India is divided into two parts. Part of it is that there are too many kinds of weapons and the quartermaster is arrogant. There is also some corruption in India. I will talk about corruption later. Let's start with the weapon type. As I said at the beginning, a combat team in India has 10 people. As a result, there are five types of rifles in hand, and the bullets used are inconsistent. This doesn't seem to do any good except annoy the quartermaster. Cover the quartermaster's coffin board first and talk about the shortcomings in actual combat. For example, in the middle of the war, the soldiers ran out of bullets, and as a result, none of the bullets sent by the logistics were for their own use. Positional warfare is easier said than done. You can pick up your teammates' weapons. But what if it's not positional warfare or mobile warfare? Without bullets, the gun will really become poker, because I can't use my teammates' bullets. Take light infantry weapons as an example, it seems that the evidence is insufficient. After all, in modern wars, individual light weapons are used to clean the battlefield.

Then let's demonstrate the Indian Air Force again. When it comes to the Indian Air Force, we have to mention Stan Airlines. If a person who knows nothing about India sees the misery of the Indian Air Force, I am afraid that Stan Airlines has defected to the enemy. After all, as long as this plane is repaired by Genstein Airlines, it will basically have an accident. Although it is rumored that India will introduce F- 16 production line. But personally, I think it is useless for India to introduce F- 15, because the basic industry is not good. As for the glorious fighters made in India, the Indian military even refused to accept them for a time. Even some Indian military officers think that it costs too much to develop this excellent fighter. If you use this money to buy Su Huoyi in Russia, it will be more reliable. And as far as I know, the Indian Air Force bought a gust again. This equipped India, the best fighter in the world.

? 3. Corruption is serious and the cohesion of the army is too weak. In fact, the corruption of the Indian military has been on the table, and even the corresponding interest groups have been formed. This makes everyone feel incredible, and corruption can also corrupt flowers. Moreover, the Indian army also broke the news that the food of frontline officers and soldiers is feed. For a country, the army is the most important builder and participant of national defense. If a country does not have a strong army as a guarantee, it is just like a person walking in the street without pants. Moreover, the Indian army did not reform and inherited the caste system internally. Caused inequality between officers and men. In fact, it is difficult for such an army to have strong cohesion and organization. In fact, the reason why the army is more effective is because the army is more organized. So India announced this time that the Indian army is the fourth in the world. Let's take it as a joke.