What do you think of table tennis in Tokyo Olympic Games? Shuigu Jun hit the table with a blow.

Update-tell the good news first. The Japanese men's singles have all been eliminated (of course, the Force is no match for China's men's singles, so it's really nothing good). If you hate the Japanese team, it's enough for you to mock their men's singles level.

And talk about something—

Blowing a ball and touching the table can get 8: 0, which is basically an insult to table tennis and a blasphemy to professional players. The strength is not good, the state is not good, don't look for other reasons, and adjusting your mentality is the key to winning singles. Ito Miki ranks second in the world, and the impact on the women's singles champion is realistic. Don't use these reasons to make excuses for the China team. If you change your role, you will know that this is just an excuse that you can't afford to lose.

If you lose, you lose, and a foul is a foul. But if you say that we lost because the Japanese players blew the ball, it would be a bit self-deception.

Many comments on the Internet mocked the Japanese team. In the final analysis, I think the Japanese mixed doubles "won without force" this time. Is this a fact?

Without force, where is there no force?

1, the technical and tactical level, at most 50-50, Ito Meicheng, who is the second in the singles world, is definitely worthy of Liu, and Shuigu Junnan is slightly inferior to Xu Xin, but it is also 50-50 after the state. In this regard, the China team has no big advantage of "brain supplement by netizens".

2. In preparation, the Japanese team knew that there was no hope for singles and team champions, so they came to mixed doubles. They made a thorough understanding of the combination of "new literature and even blogs", especially Xu Xin's attack method, that is, "slow and high hanging arc circle" As long as you watch the game, you will know that China's attack style in the second half is extremely single, and before the game, he didn't thoroughly study the combination of Ito Meicheng and Shuigu Junyi, and he was not ready to make a move.

3, state, psychological construction, home court advantage, referee, there is nothing to complain about. Every Olympic host has home court advantage. Do you dare to say that China has no home court advantage at all in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games? This time, it is obvious that the Japanese team is in excellent condition, and the more they play, the more fire they get. However, the two players in China were not very stable at the beginning of the third game, so don't abandon the players and try to find objective defects. Even if they don't blow the ball or touch the table, China will win the game. What did China dare not say?

4. Tucao Ito looks ugly and laughs obscene. I don't understand why professional competitions have risen to personal attacks. At least the quality of the national team is not that bad. Many people have a good relationship with Ito in private, including our "fat man who doesn't know the ball". Ito was not less educated before. What's more, the Olympic final is just a psychological quality competition. People can bear it, and there is no sense of emptiness in the face of China team. Isn't this great? Do you have to scare everyone who plays table tennis against China before watching this game?

So the mentality is correct, don't let people see China jokes. If we think that the opponent's foul caused us to lose, it is really a loss. Beating them alone is the right way.