What do you think of what Ma Yun said? China's house is the least valuable after 8 years?

This problem should be viewed objectively.

Ma Yun said that the house in China after eight years is the least valuable, which is based on the future trend of China after eight years. Now China's economy has been growing continuously. In recent years, local governments have been promoting the policy that houses are used for living, not for speculation. The state has carried out a series of macro-control on houses, such as restricting purchases. China's economic growth is accompanied by the corresponding rise in prices, and everyone's income has basically doubled compared with five years ago.

But why will house prices be the least valuable after eight years? Because eight years later, compared with now, China's economy has made a great leap, the national income has also been greatly improved, and the people's quality of life has also improved very badly. However, housing prices are still under the state's macro-control. We can't say what the house price was like eight years ago or after 1980. House prices have been fluctuating and growing steadily. We say it is cheap because it is not so difficult to achieve compared with our economic income. Now we can't even buy a house with a monthly salary, but after eight years, we can buy a house with a salary of ten or even twenty square meters. And eight years later, compared with eight years ago, the growth rate of house prices is far lower than that of our wage income.

So China's house is the least valuable after eight years. This sentence has some truth, but it can't be regarded as radish and cabbage, which also shows that the purchasing power of ordinary people has improved.