Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

From the perspective of biological evolution, of course, the chicken came first and then the egg. Everyone knows that living things gradually evolve from low-level to high-level, from aquatic to terrestrial, from simple to complex. Chickens are birds and have evolved from reptiles, which in turn have evolved from fish, and fish have evolved from invertebrates. We know that lower organisms reproduce by dividing themselves, while fish and reptiles lay eggs. When they have evolved to a certain extent, the first egg is produced. How to distinguish eggs from eggs? It's simple, eggs have hard shells and eggs have soft shells. So we can understand that when an organism no longer differentiates and produces an egg, then this organism is the egg ancestor. Similarly, the first generation of chickens came from eggs. After it laid the egg, it became the egg ancestor. Therefore, the chicken comes first and then the egg.

The chicken comes first to refute, and the egg comes first to establish

What is said above is very clear, but it is also extremely absurd. How to control the softness and hardness of eggs? The change is not immediate, but gradual. If the thickness of 0.01mm can be regarded as an egg, then why can't 0.009mm be regarded as an egg and must it become an egg? I think the egg came first. First of all, when a species evolves to have complete chicken characteristics, it can be called a chicken. Then the egg is the ancestor of the chicken, and the guy who laid the egg is not a chicken because it is still a little bit different from a chicken. From this, we can conclude that first There are chickens.

The egg comes first to refute, and the chicken comes first to establish the two.

It is true that things change from quantitative to qualitative changes, but science is science, and science also has its definitions, such as pH, with 7 is the standard, if it is small, it will be acidic, if it is too high, it will be alkaline. This is well known. So an egg is an egg and an egg is an egg. As for what the other party said about the ancestor of the chicken, it is really laughable. The question we are discussing is which came first, the chicken or the egg. The egg is of course the egg. What you are talking about is the guy's egg, not the egg, so it just proves what I said that the chicken came first and then the egg. This is a common sense question. Eggs are naturally laid by chickens, and chickens themselves evolved gradually from birds.

The chicken comes first, and the egg comes first

If the other party wants to say that, I can’t help it, so it can be said that I am not a human being, but I am changing every day, yes Doesn’t it mean that one day we will become inhuman? Because science has proven that many human organs are in the process of degeneration, such as our wisdom teeth. Nowadays, many humans no longer grow wisdom teeth. So the original definition is that humans have 32 teeth (of course, accidental injuries such as knocking out are not taken into account). Does it mean that those with 28 teeth today are no longer human? This is very funny and absurd. What is a chicken? What is an egg? This is the most basic knowledge. The chicken I mentioned earlier is a chicken with complete chicken characteristics, not a piece of data. The other party wants to say that the egg is not an egg, which is really funny. The egg that can hatch a chicken is not an egg or something, but it has to be said to be that guy's egg. It's funny. Do you know how many eggs that guy laid? Are they all the same? Can each one hatch a chicken? No, only this one is, so of course this one is an egg, and of course it is that guy's egg. This is not contradictory. The so-called nine sons of a dragon are all different, but this one is all an egg. So as the saying goes, the egg comes first.

The egg comes first in two barges, and the chicken comes first in three establishments.

The other party proposed such a concept, which is very good. The dragon gives birth to nine sons, each of whom is different. But I suddenly discovered that the other party may have overlooked an extremely important issue, and the other party may actually have fallen into a thinking trap. I want to ask? Was the ancestor of chickens necessarily born from eggs? Isn't it something else? Although according to the laws of biological evolution, we generally believe that as one of the representatives of birds, when a chicken becomes a chicken, it is most likely to be born from an egg, but we absolutely cannot rule out others! But we can be sure that chickens lay eggs. If the chicken came from another path, then there is no doubt that the chicken came first, but at the same time I can boldly say that if the path is as we have always expected, the chicken came first and then the egg.

What I want to ask is that when a dragon gives birth to nine sons, are they nine dragon eggs or other eggs? The same guy laid several eggs, such as quail eggs, sparrow eggs, peacock eggs, and chicken eggs. Who would be naive to say that he laid a quail egg, a peacock egg, and a sparrow egg? , an egg? At the same time, the other party is clearly confusing the situation. According to the laws of biological evolution, that guy should be very close to a chicken. Even if his egg cannot hatch into a chicken for the time being, a chicken must be born later. So I stick to my point of view, that guy laid an egg and hatched a chicken, and he is the ancestor of chickens. And that egg is not a chicken egg, because hatching is not only caused by the egg itself, but also by a series of factors such as climate, environment, etc. Only the egg laid after the chicken hatches can become an egg.

The chicken comes first, and the egg comes first.

What the other party said is very good, but in fact it is you who confuse things, not me. First of all, the other party deliberately raised the issue of sudden rate in order to suppress me. I can say that biological variation is not what you said. It is a question of quantitative change to mutation. There is no doubt that chickens evolved step by step, from eggs. I have repeated the reasons many times, so there is no need to repeat them. The traditional Chinese dragons give birth to nine sons. Although they are different, they all belong to the dragon species. No matter how different the eggs laid by that guy are, the eggs they hatch will also be slightly different. Does it mean that we still need to separate eggs into male eggs, female eggs, black eggs, and white eggs? This is unnecessary and purely redundant. In short, the guy laid an egg and hatched a chicken, so do we still need to argue about whether the egg is an egg? The environmental factors the other party calls are secondary. Could it be that swans hatch by the water? At most, it affects some insignificant details, such as coat color and body type. We cannot deny the fact that it is an egg. And the guy who lays the egg cannot really be called a chicken, so do we still need to deny that there is an egg? Of course, there is an egg first and then a chicken! !

Final Conclusion

In fact, this is a common sense mistake of ours. For example, we name the egg laid by chicken A as egg A. Egg A lays chicken B, and chicken B lays egg B. In fact, chicken A is different from chicken B, and egg A is different from egg B. They are all constantly changing or It's called evolving, but we habitually divide them into chickens and eggs and forget the difference. That's all