Is there a chicken or an egg first in the world?

There is an argument between chicken and egg. Chicken comes first.

From the perspective of biological evolution, of course, there are chickens before eggs. As we all know, organisms have evolved from low to high, from aquatic to terrestrial, and from simple to complex. Chickens belong to birds and evolved from reptiles, which evolved from fish, while fish originated from invertebrates. We know that lower organisms divide and reproduce on their own, while fish reptiles lay eggs, and when they evolve to a proper level, they produce the first egg. How to distinguish eggs from eggs? Quite simply, eggs are hard shells and eggs are soft shells. Therefore, we can understand that when an organism no longer differentiates to produce an egg, then this organism is the ancestor of this egg. Similarly, the first generation of chickens came from eggs and became the ancestors of eggs after laying eggs. So, the chicken comes before the egg.

Chicken comes first, egg comes first.

The above is very clear, but it is also extremely absurd. How to master the hardness of eggs? This change is not immediate, but gradual. My thickness of 0.0 1mm can be regarded as an egg, so why not 0.009mm? I think eggs come first. First of all, a species can only be called a chicken if it has evolved to have the characteristics of a complete chicken, then that egg is the ancestor of the chicken, and the guy who laid this egg is not a chicken because he is a little shorter than the chicken, so it can be concluded that the chicken came first.

Eggs come first, chickens come first.

It is true that things change from quantitative change to qualitative change, but science is science, and science also has its definition, such as pH, with 7 as the standard, small is acid, and excessive is alkali. This is well known. So an egg is an egg and an egg is an egg. As for what the other party said about the ancestors of chickens, it was ridiculous and generous. The question we are discussing is which comes first, the chicken or the egg. Of course, eggs are eggs. You're talking about that guy's egg, not that egg, which just confirms what I said: the chicken comes before the egg. This is a matter of common sense. Eggs are naturally born by chickens, and chickens themselves are gradually evolved from birds.

Again, chicken comes first, then eggs.

If the other person wants to say that, I can't help it, so I can say that I am not a person and I am changing every day. Does that mean that one day we will become inhuman? Because science has proved that many human organs are degenerating, such as our wisdom teeth, and now many human beings no longer grow wisdom teeth, then the original definition is that human beings have 32 teeth (of course, accidental injuries such as knocking out are not recorded). Does it mean that those 28 teeth are not human now? This is very funny and absurd. What is a chicken? What is an egg? This is the most basic knowledge. The chicken I mentioned earlier is a chicken with complete chicken characteristics, not a data. The other person wants to say that eggs are not eggs, which is very funny. The eggs that can hatch chickens are not chicken eggs or anything, but that guy's eggs. Interesting. Do you know how many eggs that guy laid? Does that mean the rest is the same? Can hatch chickens? No, only this one is, so this one is naturally a chicken's egg, and of course it is also that guy's egg, which is not contradictory. The so-called Longsheng Jiuzi is different. This is an egg. So, there are eggs first.

Two bargains have eggs first, three stands have chickens first.

It's good that the other party put forward such a concept. The dragon gave birth to nine sons, and the nine sons were different. But I suddenly found that the other party may have overlooked an extremely important issue, and the other party may have actually fallen into a thinking trap. I have to ask? Must the ancestors of chickens be laid by eggs? Isn't it something else? Although according to the law of biological evolution, we generally believe that as one of the representatives of birds, when a chicken becomes a chicken, its path is likely to be egg-laid, but we can never exclude others! But we can be sure that chickens can lay eggs. If the chicken was born by his path, there is no doubt that the chicken came first, but at the same time, I can boldly say that if the path is as we have been expecting, the chicken will come first and the egg will come again. What I want to ask is, did the dragon lay nine dragon eggs or other eggs? The same guy laid several eggs, such as quail, sparrow, peacock and chicken. It's hard to say who would naively say that he laid a quail egg, a peacock egg, a sparrow egg and an egg? At the same time, the other party is obviously confusing. According to the law of biological evolution, that guy should have been very close to a chicken. Even if his eggs can't hatch a chicken for a while, then a chicken must be born later. So I stick to my point of view, that guy laid an egg and hatched a chicken, which is the ancestor of the chicken. And that egg is not an egg, because hatching is not only the reason of the egg itself, but also a series of factors such as climate and environment. Only eggs laid after hatching can become eggs.

Chicken comes first, egg comes first.

What the other party said was very good, but in fact it was your Excellency who confused the audience, not me. First, in order to suppress me, the other party deliberately raised a question of suddenness. I can say that biological variation is not what you say, but a problem of quantitative change to mutation. Chickens evolved step by step, and there is no doubt that they came from eggs. I have repeated the reason many times, so I don't need to repeat it. China traditional dragon gave birth to nine sons, although different, but all belong to the dragon species. Anyway, the eggs laid by the same guy are different, and the things hatched will be a fraction. Do we have to divide eggs into male eggs, female eggs, black eggs and white eggs? This is unnecessary, purely redundant. Anyway, that guy laid an egg and hatched a chicken. Is it necessary for us to argue whether this egg is an egg or not? The so-called environmental factors over there are secondary. Can it be said that swans hatch at the water's edge? At most, it affects some trivial details, such as coat color and texture, so the fact that it is an egg cannot be denied. And the guy who laid the egg really can't be called a chicken, so do we still need to deny such an egg? Of course, the egg comes first, then the chicken! !

Final theory

In fact, this is a common sense mistake in our consciousness. For example, we named the egg laid by chicken A as egg A, which gave birth to chicken B, and chicken B gave birth to egg B. In fact, chicken A is different from chicken B, and so are eggs A and B. They are constantly changing, or evolution, but we habitually divide them into chickens and eggs and forget their differences.