GameStop stock is prohibited from opening a position. How do you evaluate this move?

I think this sentence is very excessive and completely inconsistent with the principle of free trading, because this incident itself was a gathering of retail investors and then hyped it up. Their behavior was completely in line with the rules, but the fund company did not expect it. They would do this when the fund company was short selling, and were caught off guard by the collective push of retail investors. Because the fund company lost a lot of money on this matter, they used a dirty trick and deleted the stock code. , it is forbidden to open a position and pull the network cable, so this matter is definitely an obscene practice, because it completely violates the principle of fair trade. On this point, the Taizhou hearing is already preparing to conduct a hearing on the company.

As for other retail investors who were trapped in it, they were prepared to close the door and beat the dog, but the methods they used were despicable and legitimate methods, because they felt that they had no face, and they were actually beaten by a group of retail investors, that is, Leeks, as we collectively call them, cut their own leeks. This was intolerable to them, so they made such a ridiculous move. Moreover, this incident happened in the United States, which advocates nation and freedom, but it opened our eyes. , this is also the worst incident in the history of Wall Street, and it is also huge news.

Many retail investors have now gathered on Wall Street to protest, holding up signs to express the country’s response to this matter. We take it very seriously. It’s just that it won’t be that fast to start hearings, but this incident is enough to prove that capital controls the market monopoly. As soon as the market makes a mistake, some unfair means can be used to fight against retail investors, and retail investors have worked hard to earn their money. Their hard-earned money will be cut off by them using other means. If the other party uses legitimate means, then everyone will have nothing to say, but talking about such despicable means is shocking. Unexpectedly, the means used by the superior capitalists To be so mean.

Because for the retail investors who gathered together, their methods were legitimate, but when the fund company was short selling, they chose to go long. It is also through normal and reasonable means, and the stock market is originally a platform for everyone to use these means, but under unexpected circumstances of the fund company. He even resorted to the other three methods of unplugging the network cable, but it didn't work if he really wanted to make people laugh. We can imagine the Wall Street tycoons in green suits and Wall Street financial giants. Facing the impact of retail investors, in order to prevent retail investors from confronting them, they violated the rules of the game and unplugged the network cables and deleted the stock codes. That is No. If the other party trades and they are trapped in it, is this still a free trading market? Excuse me.