How is Bert called a tactical master?

A coach who can lead Warren to beat Real Madrid and Barcelona to win two league titles and Liverpool to win the Champions League. This is the best shooting coach in more than 20 years, and of course he is a good coach. Bert is first-class in terms of record and tactics. The following is my personal opinion. I didn't investigate because I'm not a fan of Valencia or Liverpool. Please give me guidance.

I think the coach's power should be divided into several aspects, such as the daily training of the team, the command of the forest farm on the field, the management of the locker room, the team operation, tactical design, style design, youth training and so on. Obviously, Bertrand is a master in some aspects, but he is not satisfactory in some aspects. Watching football, I think top coaches mainly look at shortcomings. Some top coaches may have a shortcoming, but they are absolutely first-class in all aspects. Unfortunately, Bert has a little more shortcomings, so he is a first-class coach, but he can't be called top.

To sum up Benitez's coaching style, I think the most accurate word is balance. No matter from his tactical design, player selection and problem solving, he pursues balance. But there is also a word that has always accompanied Bertrand, and that is contradiction. Bert has always been called the tactician and the king of rotation, but he is always made of iron .4231:; At Liverpool, he won the title of Cup King, but his fame really made Warren win the league title. On the one hand, he rarely puts every soldier in the most suitable position, but it is useless in the transfer market. Benitez is always not good at dealing with the locker room, but few players have spoken ill of Benitez.

Tactically, Bertrand was lucky to take over Cooper's class. In fact, in those years when Warren fans praised him, Cooper was decisive. Benito's first league title was very lucky. Valencia's performance is not better than last season, at least in terms of points. However, under the leadership of Perez, Real Madrid suffered repeated setbacks, and Lacobasa withdrew from the championship group early. Cooper left a "canizares-Ayala-pellegrino-Ba Laha-Albeda" central axis defense system for Benitez, which is world-class. On the one hand, some Valen fans want to prove how excellent Ba Laha and Albeda are. On the other hand, they want to say how difficult it is for Valen to win the championship, which is contradictory. In fact, Warren's defense system is much more stable than Jerome+helguera+Makelele of Real Madrid. Don't forget that Carlos and salgado on both sides won't pay for defense. Benitez boldly launched Mista and aimar. Warren in 0304 is already the roof of La Liga, Real Madrid is going downhill, Barcelona is in darkness before dawn, and Warren is in his prime. Burt hasn't changed for several years after he tasted the sweetness of the defense system, which is basically the idea. Mainly in the frontcourt, Bertrand has determined his own style. At this time, he has completely abandoned the traditional double striker and single striker. He also gave up the previous high pile setting. He asked a player who has a wide range of activities and holds the ball, mainly making a fuss about the 3 of 42,365,438+0, without emphasizing the speed of the two flanks (Vicente just runs fast and can't help it), but he must pass the ball and shoot. Do you think this is normal? Now all teams basically play this way. Yes, that's right. There is a saying that the modern version of 423 1 was created by Benitez. During the Warren period, Bert was in the limelight, and with the legacy of his predecessor, he gradually established his own tactical play.

Warren's poor economic situation, the strong rise of La Liga duo and Liverpool's ambition brought Bette to the Premier League. Look at Liverpool in 2005. I read a post today, saying how bad Liverpool was at that time to show Bertrand's Excellence. In fact, Benitez is lucky again. Although there were countless excellent central defenders in those years, Carragher Hyypia was definitely a first-class central defender, plus equally excellent Riise and competent Finnan and Duddeck. Benitez once again took over a defensive line that did not need reform. Don't forget, there is an omnipotent Gerald in front of them. Although the English team lost Owen Hejsky, look what Benitez brought-Alonso, which is almost his only commendable transfer (including Reina, Mascherano and Torres, the latter is a bit expensive). Cowell is his new lover. The striker is now Baroche, the top scorer in the European Cup. Such a lineup is very competitive at any time. This year's Champions League was a great success. This year, Benitez also completed his tactical determination, and the work in the following years was centered around this. Why did Baroche get more opportunities than Cisse? Because baroque is more comprehensive. Why did luis garcia get more opportunities than Mitchell? Because it is more comprehensive. I think Benitez must be looking forward to 1 1 Steven Gerrard. Bert is very demanding of full-backs. Not only must he have the ability to assist, you can see that the full-back he signed can either play on both sides or the avant-garde defender can do everything. He has to protect the midfield to make up for Alonso's small interception range, and then he directly assigned a bodyguard Sissoko beside Alonso. Is this routine familiar with the configuration of Gattuso+Pirlo? It was very popular then, Faber+Flamini, Lampard+Essien. Later, the requirements for teammates' bodyguards became higher and higher, and players like Sissoko Flamini gradually stepped down from the historical stage. The last highlight of the same type of player is the virtue of playing Alonso. Steven gerrard got the most freedom in midfield. One of the details of Benitez's failure at Inter Milan was that he didn't find anyone who could give freedom in the frontcourt. For his tactics, staying put is equivalent to surrendering. When Baroche's embarrassment was discovered, the only transfer Liverpool won in the transfer market in the past decade-Torres, a player born for Benitez Liverpool. Torres' arrival not only gave Liverpool a technical core (not to belittle Gerrard), but also improved the whole system. Benitez's team reached its peak in balance. You can hardly find the weakest link in this team. At the same time, Chelsea are the people who build the team according to this idea, which is why Woodbird and Bertrand are always compared together. These two teams seem to be looking in the mirror. Chelsea rely more on personal ability. Jose Mourinho's Chelsea has the top three standards in the world in every position, and there is a qualified substitute, which has the function of money and enables Chelsea to ensure the momentum on all fronts. But unfortunately, due to financial reasons, Bertrand can be ranked in a top team, but he can't find a qualified substitute, and he can't find a qualified substitute in every position (except Agger). When I said "weaker ties" just now, I meant relying on Liverpool, which keeps the distance between players, to protect or make use of the region to survive. Once any link is broken, it may lead to the break of the overall balance, which is very dangerous in Changmeng. This is also the reason why Benitez continues to rotate. He hopes that the fewer shortcomings in each game, the better, and bless him not to break. But in the cup, he can play all the games with the familiar system. But he never dared to touch Torres, because if a link breaks, he can rely on Torres and Gerrard to save it. This laid the groundwork for Torres' subsequent downturn. At this time, another problem appeared. Why is there a broken chain? Why not mend it? Bertrand has two classic quotations: "Ferguson can beat me because he has a lot of 2000w players and I don't." If every transaction is also a big one, I can guarantee that it is worth it. "As we all know, Bertrand bought 77 players for 230 million pounds in six years. It's like a joke. Only six of them invested more than 1500w, which proved to be worth the money. But Bertrand's gambler mentality in the transfer market makes him feel that he can dig a Reina at a low price. At the same time, these signings certainly have many young players. Liverpool's youth training has always been good. Yakao is the representative of these years, but who were there during Benitez's time? Insua? Ngog? There is a phenomenon that I don't know whether it is a coincidence or a reason. Bertrand is a huge mess for every departing team, which has to be said to be a short board. Back to the tactical issue, Benitez's tactical concept is very breakthrough, such as the premise of 42,365,438+0, and the use of Torres to push an all-round striker to the front line, while setting up many secondary attack points behind him. The avant-garde line should not only support the front line, but also take advantage of the vacancy pulled by the center. Bertrand was also an early experimenter. The previous single striker tactics, regardless of 423 1 433, emphasized the role of the two wings more. Emphasizing the connection between two adjacent players, some people call it encirclement and suppression tactics, but I think it is more like cutting, cutting the stadium into small pieces and using local personal advantages to annihilate it. From a distance, it's really tragic that Dream II was ravaged by the tactics of Liverpool and Chelsea, and so was Inter Milan. By the way, many people now emphasize Barcelona in Dream II, and many people think it is a better team than Dream III. I think that regardless of the vertical and horizontal comparison, Dream II has not reached the level of Dream III, or Dream III is the advanced stage of Dream II and should be better than Dream III. It is really difficult for Barcelona to play in the Premier League. Chelsea and Liverpool didn't talk, but Arsenal, which has been going downhill, would have killed the game if Henry hadn't sleepwalked. Part of the reason for the rise of Dream Three is to crack this tactic of Liverpool and Chelsea. I won't let you rob me on a small scale because you are so fierce in encirclement and suppression. Therefore, the increase in the small-scale transmission of Dream III may lead to the unsmooth game, but it is a counterattack against the anti-Barcelona tactics. In a word, Benitez was also very lucky during his stay in Liverpool, winning an important championship in the first year, which ensured the establishment of Liverpool within a few years, but it turns out that in the long run, Benitez is not good for Liverpool. Once again, due to financial factors, the two sides broke up.

Benitez's experience in Liverpool, I think he has a lot of regrets, and he should have come to Inter with this regret. When I first entered Valencia Liverpool, I looked at cards badly, but not only was it not enough, but the starting point was also low. Coupled with luck, Benitez successfully passed the transition period and entered the honeymoon period. However, Inter Milan left behind a champion team and a generous boss, but in fact, the Inter Milan that Benitez took over was the worst. If the team doesn't take it, the players will become famous. The former is an arrogant wooden bird and a boss who has no intention to pay. A group of excellent reserve players. Look at all this. Did you hit Benitez's soft spot? For Bertrand, it is unfair not to sign an important contract for a summer, which he deserves. The performance at Inter finally proved the fact that Bertrand is really unfit to live in a big club with high pressure and high requirements. Looking at the player configuration, Benitez has an almost unused standing striker (Milito) in front of him. Behind him, Sneijder is still depressed and injured. There is an Eto 'o on the side. When has Benitez ever used a better winger? There are four veterans over 30 in the back line, especially two wingers. Mai Kong is powerless, so how can he let Chivu take all the wingers? Moratti has always been indecisive, and when he realized the reconstruction, Inter Milan had no place for Bertrand.

At this point, I think it's time to end. Benitez's next season is still uncertain, and there are rumors of Napoli, Schalke, Real Madrid, Paris, Monaco or several other teams. There is an interesting phenomenon in the football coaching circle. Some characteristic coaches are often unable to make a comeback after experiencing a failure of the giants. For example, Cooper, Klinsmann, Perez, Camacho, Leonardo (I mean, coaching is a bit unprofessional), I also want to add Rijkaard, and maybe Mancini. I wonder if Benitez will be like the appellant. No, he can't turn over in the coach. Why do you say that? It is an obvious fact that the big clubs have lost interest in him, so Chelsea will not keep him, and I don't think Real Madrid and Paris will expect him. However, some big bosses may be interested in Benitez. Monaco, several teams in Russia, need such famous coaches to improve their performance in a short time. In addition, second-rate Europeans like Schalke Naples will also throw an olive branch to him. They have some good players in reserve, and there is no shortage of funds. There may not be many opportunities at home, but they want to go further in Europe. For Benitez, I don't think a big club is a good place to go, especially this summer is a period of great change of coaches, which means that there may be fewer opportunities in the next few years, so it is still feasible to go to a second-rate team in Europe. A coach like Benitez, if you don't give him some space, you can't inspire his energy. If it is as I said, will Benitez bid farewell to the giants? No, I think Benitez has a high understanding of football. His business is top-notch, but his handling of the problem is debatable, which is reflected in dressing room and transfer. At the same time, because he retired in his early years, as far as his career is concerned, it is pot calling the kettle black, so their coaching styles are very practical, and it is certainly feasible to pursue a winning coach. Why must we attach importance to youth training, as long as we have achievements. Who cares? Do you think Benitez has the right position? As a national team coach, I predict that Benitez will take over a national team in two years, especially after next summer, when the national team faces a change of coach, Benitez can find a suitable national team for him to play. I hate to admit his ability in this field. Maybe the next Hiddink?

Of course, I still have to answer the landlord's questions. For the performance of Chelsea and Benitez this year, I still apply my interpretation of Benitez. Lampard and Gerrard are the same type of players, so Lampard got Bertrand's reuse, broke the record and won the championship. This is not only a tactical need, but also a need within the team. Bertrand is not sociable, but he is not a fool. He knows he won't stay at Chelsea for long, and he doesn't want to make mistakes in such a short time. 2. Still the familiar Torres, but not as good as before. There were almost no strikers of the same type in those days, but now they are everywhere. Some people run faster than Tuoniu, some people are stronger, some people shoot more accurately, some people dribble better, and some people are better than him, such as Fa Erkao. So I dug a Dunbar. It still makes sense in Benitez's hands, right? 3. Because Benitez is not in Chelsea's long-term plan, others can evaluate him separately. Why did Chelsea fall behind early? There is something wrong with the idea of building a team. Technology flow is the general trend. Uncle Marta's arrival is inevitable, no problem, but it won't bring Oscar Hazare. The question of 1+ 1 is always a risk. Now it seems that the effect has not been achieved. The frontcourt has lost its hardness, and Dempa is a good start, or one of Fa Erkao and cavani should be introduced, and the last three can be strong. The midfield needs reform. I have to say that the midfield has become the core of Chelsea's problems. In the face of unstable defence and young avant-garde, Mikel Ramirez, Lampard and romeu have nothing to reuse (except Lampard). 4. Did Chelsea fail this season? This season has been a great success. Some teams will lose their money in the process of promotion, such as Arsenal, which won the championship for seven years. For example, Liverpool has not found a feeling for more than 20 years, such as Inter Milan in the past two years. However, Chelsea can win several important titles in the promotion. This is a kind of spiritual thought that Abramovich and Mubode instilled in Chelsea. After nearly 10 years of hard work, Chelsea can finally be called a giant, not an upstart. An upstart with his own team culture can be called a giant. In the new season, Fa Erkao/cavani+top midfielder+qualified central defender. Chelsea are still to be reckoned with. 5, the role of Benitez, to be honest, really has no significant effect. After the alliance took office, it plummeted and has been tepid ever since. Losing the World Club Cup is a great shame. Manchester United in the FA Cup is the highlight of this season. The Europa League is better than nothing.