Iraq has been proved to be free of weapons of mass destruction. Who should be responsible for the suffering in Iraq?

In September 2002, Saddam Hussein in Baghdad, the capital of Iraq, was puzzled by one thing. The news was released by British MI 6 and the British Joint Intelligence Committee in London, and was confirmed by American intelligence agencies. It seems that the title is great, but the content points out that Iraq led by Saddam Hussein's regime has a large number of weapons of mass destruction, which can all be used within 45 minutes.

But in fact, it turned out that Saddam even suspected that his subordinates had information and secrets that he didn't know. So how did British MI 5 know what the Iraqis didn't know? The Iraq war that broke out on March 20, 2002 was led by the United States and Britain, which had previously accused Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction. This is also the main reason why the Coalition forces went to war against Iraq.

In fact, as early as June 5438+065438+ 10, 2002, Britain and the United States hypocritically asked Alek to immediately cooperate with the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect and disarm weapons of mass destruction in accordance with United Nations Security Council resolution 144 1. However, due to the lack of evidence in Britain and the United States, even the United Nations Security Council failed to persuade it, let alone enter Iraq in a big way and risk a conflict with Saddam Hussein's government to investigate, so then US President George W. Bush euphemistically called it? Solve the Iraq problem through peace? The means failed, and then directly sent troops to provoke the Iraq war in 2003.

Iraq signed the Geneva Protocol on 193 1, the Treaty on the Prohibition of the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons on 1969, and the Biological Weapons Convention on 19 1 until1/kloc- Britain and the United States can never do this.

This problem can be divided into two levels: first, the intelligence sources of British and American intelligence agencies are wrong; Second, the collected information has not been analyzed hypothetically, but taken seriously directly. In 2002, there was a joke in MI6, because the intelligence personnel sent by Britain had collected a seemingly unreliable information, pointing out that Iraq was buying uranium from Niger, so after preliminary analysis, this information actually went to Iraq. Develop nuclear weapons? The strange result is that if the final information has not been appraised by the technical experts of the intelligence department of the Ministry of National Defense, it is estimated that Britain and the United States have another excuse to declare war on Iraq.

In fact, this information was completely false, because it was later proved that Iraq did not buy uranium from Niger. Therefore, it seems not surprising that Britain and the United States have come to the conclusion that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction. There is no other supporting evidence that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction that can be started within 45 minutes, such as information on weapons production and storage, and the specific timetable for starting these weapons. A British chemical weapons expert, who asked not to be named, said that it seems that no one strictly censors this information, but people hope it is true too much.

With regard to the rumor that Iraq may have weapons of mass destruction, after the war began, the whole world turned its attention to the United Nations inspectors searching in the ruins of Iraq. According to the information provided by Britain and the United States, United Nations monitors went to every suspicious place for a detailed search, but found nothing. An investigation led by the United States found that Iraq had stopped its weapons of mass destruction and cleared its stocks. The basement in the intelligence is still the basement, and the chicken farm is still the chicken farm. There are no hidden secret weapons storage sites.

Obviously, the failure to find any weapons of mass destruction is a mistake in analyzing intelligence, because intelligence personnel stubbornly believe that Iraq possessed such weapons in A.D. 1990. Although the inspectors returned empty-handed, people were reluctant to recheck the information.