Why didn't you directly win the battle against cavalry in ancient times?

It seems that you don't know much about ancient wars.

First, why not attack horses? Killing the enemy was the greatest purpose in ancient times.

Bows and arrows are not far away.

At this time, a horse was injured and could still run. You have hardly killed anyone, and the enemy has rushed in.

Under the hedge of cavalry, people almost committed suicide

So you see, in the history of China, only the Ming Dynasty was established from south to north.

Everything else is pressed from north to south.

If you have studied history, you will be horrified to find that no dynasty was severely compressed in the middle period.

China was once pushed to the south.

It can be said that Hubei is now occupied by nomadic people.

There are many plains on it, which is not good for us.

Secondly, I want to talk about the difference between China and the West. Everyone in the western phalanx fought in heavy armor.

The east is used to guarding with the city, not hedging with them.

And you said Yue Fei cut off a horse's leg.

What a big joke. Think about it. Even if you wear a lot of clothes, do you dare to run into the road and hit the car and its wheels?

I can tell you, this is suicide. Even if you can cut off a few horse legs under the impact of high-speed cavalry, your team will be divided and surrounded and slaughtered

History also says that he tamed a kidnapped horse, right?

What is a kidnapper's horse? I can tell you now that he refers to the left and right wings of the cavalry, which is a misinformation.

In addition, the serial horse array created by General Murong Jiatian in Wuhu period can't be cracked without hot weapons now, but like heavy cavalry, he has high requirements for horses and slow speed, and was later eliminated.

The tactics of Mangu evil created by Mongols are very simple.

However, the whole west was surrounded by the Bundesliga and still lost.

Therefore, in the era of cold weapons, cavalry is the most horrible existence, especially the nomadic people who are good at riding and shooting.

In addition, for those horses in Mongolia, endurance and persistence are very powerful.

You are the way I can easily break it.

I can sacrifice a few people in front of me and rush to you. Once your bow is powerful, it will be troublesome to install it after launching.

(At that time, there were not three strokes, which appeared in the Ming Dynasty. Even if there is, it won't do much harm.

But once I rush in, your formation will be chaotic, so you will die.

Besides, I can call without contacting you. Anyway, I am better at archery than you.

And Mongolia, with little armor. You can easily penetrate it.

In short, once the cavalry touches you, you are finished.

Yue Fei's story is false. The Song Dynasty used soldiers at that time.

They formed a big circle and blocked it with cars.

When setting up many organs, you can shield them, but the key is that your formation time will be very long and your activities will be very inconvenient. If your route for providing foodstuff is broken, you will lose, and he can only defend but not attack.

Cavalry can rob things everywhere in other people's territory, and the supply is simple, and there is a shortage of horses in the Song Dynasty.

But it is still possible to win by using the terrain.

finished

Typing is killing me.

If you don't understand, ask me

Tell me more about 1 building. Don't mislead people.

The one on the second floor is still right about military issues. . . . . wordless

I can't even see the answer. I said I really want to cut off a horse's leg. You can try. It is best to use mixed horse ropes on a large scale.

Supplementary answer

Hello, landlord

/view/503378.html？ wtp=tt

This is the specific information of the abducted horse.

For a long time, people have interpreted "kidnapper horse" as "serial cavalry in real armor", that is, serial horse. This statement was first seen in the Chronicle of the King of Hubei compiled by Yue Fei's descendants: "When the soldiers are strong, they are all sold again, and all three are connected by a rope. All three are carried away by horses and iron, and blocked on the wall, but the official army can't, and wins again and again." This statement has been adopted by official and folk history books and popular novels, and "serial horse" has become a form of war known to women and children. It wasn't until Emperor Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty organized the literati to compile a Collection of Imperial Views in his name that he realized that this statement was unreasonable, so he wrote a section of Imperial Views, pointing out: "The artificial horses in the north are only convenient for longitudinal control. If Sanma contacts, the horsepower will be uneven, which will inevitably be different from before; And three people are connected, or brave and timid, the brave is tired by the timid, which is easy to understand. ..... Wu Shu vs. Plain Xi 'an, ... Will his horse be bound by others? At this time or at that time, they are in step and invincible. The Song people saw the unstoppable trend and made a name for themselves. " The Qing people's refutation of the old saying is very convincing, but the explanation of the word "abduction horse" is still unclear. What exactly does "Kidnapper Horse" mean? Deng Guangming, an expert in the history of the Song Dynasty, once wrote an article entitled "A Textual Research on the Problem of Turning Horse", which made a detailed textual research and pointed out that the name of turning horse came from the mouth of "Hebei signing the army" in the national army at that time. The so-called "Hebei army" refers to the Han people recruited by Jin Qiang from various households in Hebei, so the word "Guaima" should be a Chinese language rather than a Jurchen language.

As far as I can see, the lack of horses in history books seems to be more serious in the Song Dynasty, and there were horse-producing areas in other dynasties. Therefore, the rule of the north in Wuhu period had its special period, and the lack of horses was the biggest problem.

The problem of mixing Marceau is actually a big problem.

Who do you think can arrange mixing ropes on a large scale? His effect is poor.

Isn't there a three-stage attack in the Northern Song Dynasty?

I think the secretary's is only available in the Ming Dynasty. I don't know if it's right. However, judging from the musket troops of the Ming Dynasty, it may be used in a small range, but it is useless in a large range. Specifically, what's the name of the guard in Yunnan? He used this tactic, but the army in the north was useless. It can be seen that the three-stage attack was rare in the Song Dynasty.

The arrow speed+the speed of the cavalry itself can be extremely lethal.

When I say big, I also say cavalry. The cavalry in the East seldom use heavy armor.

The heavy cavalry that appeared in Wuhu period was not suitable for eastward advancement and was eliminated in the back. The east prefers speed.

However, if I sacrifice the person who charged in front, others can rush in front of you. Is this a stroke? /

I traded 1000 people for your 40,000 lives, which is still very cost-effective.

What are you talking about? Er Zhurong can't be a representative. The cavalry are invincible on the plain. In the era without muskets.

Not in the mountains.

You see, in the late Qing dynasty, it was all played by traitors.

Superpml talked about my formation. What I want to say is that I don't know the name of this formation. I know everyone gathered around and blocked it with cars. The services and arms cooperated to prevent cavalry from rushing in, and the effect was very good. After the establishment, few things broke down, but I said supply was a big problem.

Why only Ma Laiyun soldiers are used in the war, and all soldiers will dismount and pose as infantry in the battle? Note that its opponent is also a nomadic people (as a mirror)

I read that there were no saddles and stirrups in the Qin dynasty, and their functions were the same as those in the world. I wonder if there were any of these things at that time. If not, that's easy to explain. It depends on the situation in the battle.

Add again:

I looked at the answer of jxx5050 at the back.

I want to say ...

If you are in the plain, you can imagine that your troops must be crawling, so when you see that the enemy is usually 2 to 3 kilometers, you can form a circular array as I said above, that is, if there is no traffic jam, you must form an array, otherwise it is very dangerous to be cut off.

Ok, 3km, when you have arranged the array, the cavalry will rush you 700m (I really don't know if the bow can be lethal at 700m, but generally it is the limit above 300m, and the data may be problematic). I will go straight ahead and reduce the attack surface. If you are in an array of 20,000, I will sacrifice about 2,000 people at most. I can rush to you for the people below and break you with his high speed.

This is the power of cavalry