Didi announced the rectification plan for the ride. Isn't that a little overkill?

I don't think this is overkill. I think this is a very appropriate correction, and I don't think this correction of Didi has any practical effect.

The new function added by Didi is video authentication for all newly registered users, which means that it is equivalent to an insurance for identity authentication. I don't think this amendment is of any use. Didn't you need video authentication before? I think this can only be called trapping, not correction. Shouldn't this video be verified in the first place?

Plus, I quit some messy functions, and I don't think these functions can guarantee personal safety in essence. If we want to solve the personal safety problem from the source, we should conduct a professional interview for each driver. You can't say that online verification can solve it. Now that you are a villain, you can't write it directly on your face. No one knew you were a villain before it happened, so I think it's useless to just verify your identity, only from the interview.

In addition, many people are beginning to wash white drops now. I wonder what these people think. Shouldn't these functions be added from the beginning? I think it is very inappropriate to introduce these functions to ensure safety now. It is precisely because of these things that we know that the security system before Didi is so unreliable. I think it is necessary for us to get to know Didi taxi again.

To sum up, I feel that this adjustment and revision is still very inadequate, and there is no overcorrection.