How to treat the vegetation shelling incident in Xuebaliang, Tsinghua? 800-word composition

Liangzhi's classmates are very poor. I didn't make any big mistakes, but I was completely passive in front of the camera and was killed. ...

I remember that in Xiao Shuo, Gao once criticized China's pseudo-elitism education. I don't know why Gao's classmates are so elite recently. ...

Gao's view is that because a student is studying or getting a doctorate in Tsinghua University, he should even consider the world without worrying about finding a job.

I have always felt that this statement is completely unreasonable.

Are college students generally utilitarian in recent years? Yes, without affection? Yes, sometimes, do you think you will feel a little sad and sad? Yes, therefore, I think all Dr. Tsinghua should be open-minded and highlight the national weight of prestigious schools.

Gao claims to be a liberal, but his ideas are actually contradictory to liberalism. If it is liberalism, then what I like to think and do is justified as long as it doesn't hurt others. Others should fully respect their choices and have no right to interfere. Whether liangzhi is excellent or not, whether he seems to care about the world, and whether he really cares about the world, this is his own choice. As long as he doesn't hurt others, even if he wants to open a bakery, sell pork in the street, manage a toilet and become a monk in quietism after graduation, it's all good. Don't hurt others, just be happy and do whatever you want-this is the liberal view.

Of course, liangzhi was not smart enough at the scene. In fact, all the three mentioned above are showing off, and showing off is always annoying. The problem of finding a job mentioned later is actually a very practical problem, but it is obviously not what these three people want to hear-telling a joke is probably better than finding a job ... These three are basically prominent figures who often appear on the show. If liangzhi pays more attention to it, he should at least do his homework before the show and find out what these three people like to say. I don't know whether the students in liangzhi don't know what they like, or whether they are arrogant and simple, so they don't care what they like.

Finally, what I want to say most is about pseudo-elitism education. The reason why pseudo-elitism education is fake is that it can't cultivate elites at all and it's not easy to use. Just as Qian Xuesen's problems didn't help China people win the Nobel Prize at all, the expectation of students' elitism can't cultivate elites, but will only add long-term extra psychological pressure to students and play an unnecessary negative role. According to my observation, the emergence of elite, of course, needs many basic educational conditions first: for example, the material conditions are basically sufficient, you can have access to rich learning materials, you have a good and healthy relationship with your classmates in the learning process, you have a scientific study plan and time pressure, and you are fortunate to meet a good professional, responsible and patient teacher. In addition to these basic conditions, the most important thing is whether there are internal driving factors in this person's mind. This internal cause may be interest, simple and strong curiosity, or deep confusion about the unreasonable phenomenon in this world. This internal cause is needed because a person needs long-term study, accumulation and thinking to become an expert master in a field, and needs constant attention to details, and this internal cause is often the only long-term motivation that can support this person to overcome various difficulties and temptations and persist in going on. On the contrary, the social expectations of the outside world will only distract this person constantly, and he will often consciously or unconsciously think about what he should do to satisfy the people around him, instead of thinking about what this thing I want to study is about.