What are the four major failures of Sherlock Holmes?

I think it's really a joke about gossip, that is, the two upstairs said that Irene beat (cheated) Fu.

1, the fireworks tube that Watson threw in, Irene found it. At that time, those who did not doubt that the situation was fraudulent should belong to people with lower intelligence level than ordinary people.

2. Irene has long been warned to be careful of Fu (this was mentioned by herself in the letter that Irene later left for Fu). If Irene didn't react at that time, then at least she wasn't as smart as Doyle thought.

3. Fu Leng thought that the fireworks bag on the ground would not arouse any doubt of Irene (although he had noticed that Irene had suspected him at that time), and left a whole night for Irene to deal with the follow-up. Unexpectedly, Fu's IQ suddenly dropped to a lower level than that of ordinary people.

After that night, he planned to take the king to the scene to clean up the situation-expecting a stupid woman to wait there and be caught by them. Only when she is not asleep or drunk can she make such a judgment out of happiness.

The so-called scandal failure is really a romantic joke.

As for the five orange stones, Fu found LS and took measures. If the shipwreck is also blamed on him, then the normal end of everyone's life (non-accidental death) should be regarded as everyone's failure.

The yellow-faced woman was obviously defeated by a man's conceit and fooling around, and that man was himself.

Of course, Greek parliamentarians can't count, because no idiot gangster has found some relevant news in the newspaper and is still waiting to be arrested. He won't shut up immediately.

The dancer said, if a person's distress telegram is sent after his death, will someone blame himself for receiving the telegram late, causing others to die? If you can, then at least I won't. The notice for the dancer to get all the information to solve the mystery is that after the customer has an accident, he can only take corresponding actions after getting that information, which is not a blessing.

Theoretically speaking, the disappearance of four men and one woman is related to the story to be written in this book, and there is no logical connection. In my personal opinion, the veiled tenant Zhongfu was really a failure, confused by the man's forged lion paw prints and didn't see the truth clearly. In the last case, although Fu defeated the professor's henchmen, he was finally found by the professor. I think it's a draw.

If the landlord insists on an answer, my answer is that it is not written in the original, but Doyle casually said.