Why did South Korea spend 53 billion to build a thousand-year-old bridge become a historical joke?

Every time we mention Korea, we love and hate this country. Why do you say that? Because this country has charming scenery of Jeju Island and many Korean idol stars, we China people like it very much. There are many unique foods in Korea. Shopping is cheap and good. But what we hate is that in recent years, Korean culture and customs are similar to those of China in many places. However, they deny that they plagiarized or plagiarized. They said it was all original. For example, Gyeongju, South Korea spent 300 million yuan to build a thousand-year-old bridge.

Different methods, but equally satisfactory results are complaints about this bridge. But after the project was completed, many people pushed grass to build houses, and the original bridge looked too big. It is almost equivalent to completely changing the design. Careful tourists also found that he is very much like China's rear axle. The structure of these two bridges is almost the same as that of the same bridge. What exactly did this bridge build? This bridge is an ancient building that South Korea invested 300 million yuan and took 10 years to repair? Jing Yue bridge

On the Repair of Jing Yue Bridge

Indeed, this bridge has existed in Korea for a long time. However, the local government of South Korea hopes that this bridge can be used as a historical site to attract more tourists. Therefore, the restoration project has started. However, after a long restoration project, the restored old bridge is very similar to Huilong Bridge in Hunan, China, but the latter was built in Qing Dynasty. Tu Cao, a professor of architecture in South Korea, said that restoration is like a TV series, and it is necessary to complain about scenic spots. Many people complained about the old bridge. After seeing the old bridge, they felt cheated like a new bridge. They are also called the earth trough, which is a cultural recovery of ignorance.

What ancient buildings have Korea copied?

It has been said before that the bridge built in South Korea is very similar to the Huilong Bridge in China. In fact, there have been similar plagiarism cases in South Korea. For example, Gyeongbokgung Palace, a famous scenic spot in South Korea, is the palace of the Korean dynasty in Korean history. But its style and style are very similar to the Forbidden City in China. But Gyeongbokgung Palace was built in 1395, and the Forbidden City was built in 1406, because it was built earlier than the Forbidden City and copied from the Palace Museum.

There is nothing wrong with this view, but people who know history will find that this scenic spot has been destroyed many times before. Therefore, the government renovated it. The transformation time is around 1995. At that time, we went to Korea to visit Gyeongbokgung Palace, which was rebuilt. Therefore, the real Gyeongbokgung Palace is very different from the current Gyeongbokgung Palace, so there is no such thing as plagiarism in the Forbidden City. In addition, the Forbidden City is the five largest palaces in the world, with 720,000 square meters, while Gyeongbokgung Palace has only 1.26 million square meters. We can see the difference in scale.

Summary:

The ancient buildings of a country not only contain the characteristics of the country, but also reflect the appreciation level of people at that time, and also contain the cultural heritage of a country. So we can see not only the style of an ancient building, but also the style of an ancient building. When building an ancient building in a country like South Korea, there is no trace that it violates the meaning of the ancient building and repairs it in the original way, but blindly uses the aesthetics of modern people.