Will master teach his disciples everything? Do all the masters save a hand? There is a saying called "Teach disciples to starve to death".

This phenomenon often occurs in modern society. There are often apprentices looking for a master to learn technology, and they have studied for three years. As a result, when they started, the master still kept a unique skill without teaching it, so that the disciples could go out and experience it slowly.

First, those "masters" who are worried about teaching others to have no food are mostly people with insufficient ability and unwilling to study hard. I have taught others, so that some work can be handled by others, and I can learn other things, and I have one more piece than what I have been taught. How can I have no food?

Mechanical operation is a process of accumulating experience. If you have more experience than others, you will know more than others. With my continuous efforts and previous experience, I will always be better than others.

Second, the real "master" is not only to master a certain skill or knowledge, but also to have a stronger learning ability than others, constantly learning and updating themselves, thus becoming a "master".

So are the masters around me. 70-year-old eighth grade, kind and open-minded to discuss with children in their twenties and thirties. Such people will only gain more respect!

Third, there is another solution to the sentence that an apprentice has no master, which is what kind of apprentice to teach. Inheritance also has certain rules. An apprentice with bad conduct learned your skills, robbed you of your job and squeezed you out. I teach such an apprentice to shield technology. However, if you don't teach a disciple with good conduct and healthy thoughts, you are misleading others. Might as well not be the host.

Fourthly, it is necessary for China people to be technologically conservative, but it depends on the situation. For example, if the boss needs that skill, as long as the apprentice learns it, the master will have no food, which is determined by the nature of the enterprise. For example, there is no need to be conservative in my current unit, because the boss needs a lot of technical support, and it is useless for several children to study for a few years, because too many technologies are used.

When other engineers don't know how to ask me, I will tell them all and don't need to keep it. Sometimes I tell others that others may not fully understand. The former subsidiary specially invited a retired professor from the university to guide us. We asked questions and the professor told us without reservation. When a person's strength reaches a certain level, he is not afraid to tell you everything, and how much you can understand after telling you everything.

Therefore, instead of being afraid of others stealing skills, it is better to learn how to enrich yourself. The conclusion is that the idea of most machine tool people is that as long as they are promising young talents, they must pay everything for each other. It's better to learn more and make more progress than to keep a hand. This is undoubtedly an open and selfless thought and a manifestation of social progress!

From the master's point of view, people who never share knowledge with others are constantly improving themselves. Helping others is also helping yourself, and urging others to grow can also make you progress. On the other hand, people who are unwilling to pay are usually selfish, narrow-minded and enterprising. How can they always stay ahead of others?

Of course, for the apprentice, it is "the master leads the door and practices in the individual." Aggressive people can learn and make progress even if Master never teaches them, or even bullies, suppresses and despises them. For lazy and timid people, Master never tires of teaching by hand, and will not make much progress.