Ask a veteran stamp collector to identify the authenticity of a small piece of red.

Take the liberty of saying a little personal opinion:

① Find this picture in the catalogue of Posts and Telecommunications Press, and compare it with yours, and compare the number of tooth tips of tooth holes. There are two more teeth in the map of the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications.

② In the postmark of 1960s, the structure of the city post office name is: the upper half circle is the province, and the lower half circle is the bureau name; If it is a post and telecommunications sub-office, the structure is the province in the upper half and the branch name in the lower half. And your postmark is either "(upper semicircle) xi 'an, Shaanxi (lower semicircle)" or "(upper semicircle) Xi 'an, Shaanxi (lower semicircle) xx Branch", which is a joke. Also, the stamp number should be on the next crescent, and the date stamp No.8 is actually on the last crescent.

The last fatal flaw: the face value is 8, there is no unit, and that "point" is lost.

The above items are all evidence that counterfeiters are not smart enough, or they are simply prepared to deceive those with poor postal calendars.

The only outstanding thing about this "ticket" is that the perforation arrangement is fairly regular. Unlike some tickets, the perforations are all crooked and not in a straight line.

On the other hand, such "tickets" will basically be "exposed" if they are traced to several origins in a row. If you think about it, one or two million stamps are only dozens or hundreds. How can they easily fall into the hands of a post-80s, post-90s or even post-00s? It is almost impossible to get and buy such stamps without a decade or two of stamp collecting experience, but-can you have decades of stamp collecting experience to consult Baidu?