How terrible is this "outlook on life"?

"Life, this butcher's knife, first kills people's spirit, pride and unconvinced, and then slanders you with rustic vulgarity." This sounds reasonable, but in fact it is absurd and full of loopholes. Did you get caught?

When we think, "As long as we learn to accept all this, enjoy all this, strive to make our parents, wives and children live a better life, and travel freely among ordinary people, isn't it a great thing?" When we think this kind of values is a truly pragmatic attitude towards life, I remind you to beware of fraud!

"Better lonely than vulgar" is not all a fallacy in life. Vulgar realism is neither realism nor the correct values facing reality, which runs counter to "pragmatism". Are such values worthy of our pride?

Where is the road? The road is right under our feet.

Our destiny is in our own hands, and those "outlook on life" based on vulgar realism are completely hooligans! In the face of this "pseudo-realism", should we be deceived again?

Not long ago, an article published by Teacher Wang Er, the official account of WeChat, was born. This well-known and popular person on the Internet-"Five life fallacies that I only understood at the age of 30". The author who signed "A middle-aged teenager who can't help screaming when he sees rough roads" and "I don't know astronomy in the world, geography in the world, and I know a little about the absurdity of life in the middle" once really made people feel very reasonable, just like a clean stream in troubled times, which benefited many readers and was deeply inspired. However, I didn't expect that when he earned enough traffic and was full of pots, this article made him "roll over" on the spot, which was ridiculous.

Although the focus of this article is to tell us that 30 years old is an embarrassing age, and we think that we are still putting on airs and are not afraid of anything, but suddenly we have reached a stage where we need more wisdom and caution, more openness and firmness. When we are on the half slope of life, we have to cross the mountain and continue to win the battle thousands of miles away, so that we can see what is far away. However, a hundred secrets are sparse. The last fallacy pointed out in this article is simply an international joke.

"I'd rather be lonely than vulgar" should have been a classic sentence that was really close to young people's lives and urged them to make progress, but it was unconsciously labeled as "absurd life" by the author. He mentioned in the article, "I like what Xiao Hong said at that time: all I want to see is wilderness, mountains and rivers, birds; But in the real world, I have played several times, and there are housework outside. All I want is a house, a car and money, which profoundly points out the plight of middle-aged people, that is, when people are 30 years old, who dares to say that they would rather be lonely than bow to life?

If we only reveal the cruel reality deeply, that's all. This situation is "normal, and criticism is meaningless." Maybe we should get used to it. After all, it is always pointed out that "you should adapt to the environment, not let the environment adapt to you". I think this is a good attitude towards life.

After all, in some people's eyes, "you should do what you want" has become an irrefutable truth. At the age of 30, I'm afraid you really have to "compromise with reality".

The devil, hidden in the details. The real absurdity of the argument that "loneliness rather than vulgarity is absurd" in this article lies not in what cruel reality it reveals, but in the "outlook on life" it conveys, which is ridiculous and hypocritical enough.

The author said that no matter how noble a person is, it will inevitably become vulgar, because "the butcher's knife of life kills people's spirit, pride and unconvinced first, and then slanders you with rustic vulgarity", but what is wrong with this? Isn't it a great thing when you learn to accept all this, enjoy all this, and strive to make your parents, wife and children live a better life and travel freely among ordinary people? "

The value conveyed by this "outlook on life" is that it is a good thing to accept vulgarity, because people will eventually become vulgar and enjoy a vulgar life. Isn't this a great thing?

However, "I regret doing nothing most. In the end, I comforted the ordinary and valuable." This hypocritical "outlook on life" has been refuted by this forum at least twice before, and its harm has been pointed out. Today, we might as well use this as a basis to thoroughly expose the hypocritical and vulgar realistic veil behind this "outlook on life"!

Vulgar realism, also known as pseudo-realism, pseudo-realism and vulgar realism, refers to abnormal social values that actually promote wrong values under the banner of "realism", which is consistent with pragmatism and narrow utilitarianism. He believes that people are born mediocre, and if they want to survive, they must learn to accept mediocrity, do what mediocrity requires in a mediocre environment, and take the values of most people (this value refers to vulgar values) and family as their value destination.

On this basis, if we subdivide this kind of pseudo-realism, we can see that it has many deceptive manifestations, and it is easy for us to mistake this for a pragmatic value concept. Representative performance is as follows:

One of the manifestations of vulgar realism is the "family-only theory", which is a wrong value, claiming that the only value of life is family value, and only in the family can happiness be achieved, completely denying social value. This argument seems to meet the good expectations of most people for their families, so it is quite deceptive and young people are easily fooled. Such a concept will also lead to the wrong view of happiness, thinking that happiness can only be achieved by marriage and family.

This is like those "lecturers" in "Female Durban", who preach that women should be attached to marriage under the banner of "traditional culture"; Or those university teachers, such as Dai Jianye, repeatedly preach the dross concepts of "the man is the master and the woman is the master" and "marriage is just a make-do", which runs counter to the mainstream of today's society; Similarly, those so-called emotional bloggers and emotional programs repeatedly publicize the dross, mislead readers and viewers, and even take risks to such an outrageous extent that they regard the suffering of the nation as the so-called "experience", which makes the society feel very angry and indignant.

Unfortunately, the "family-only theory" based on marriage and family happiness is actually a kind of wrong values that cram for the Buddha's feet temporarily. The more you rely on marriage and family as the umbrella of happiness, the more difficult it is to get real happiness in the end. On the contrary, you may have nothing but emptiness, injury and pain.

And its other form of expression, that is, "majority theory", is more harmful to society. It takes the values of "most people" as a reference object, which not only obliterates individuality, but even promotes the wrong values of "most people are always right, so you must listen to the expectations of most people", which is very similar to "recognizing and enjoying the ordinary", but it is a confusing "right-wing poisonous apple" in essence.

This kind of values mistakenly regards mediocrity and vulgarity as mediocrity, and advocates that "hard work will not succeed", which completely harms countless young people, makes them willing to be mediocre without knowing it, loses their high spirit and fighting spirit, and cannot really face setbacks and difficulties. It claims to "adapt to society", but it is actually a naked "ostrich mentality" that escapes from reality!

As for publicly advocating that "life is a knife to kill pigs, the first thing to kill is people's spirit, pride and unconvinced, and then you will be smeared with mud vulgarity", it is even more shocking to advocate this "outlook on life" that is content with mediocrity as the road to life, which can be completely classified as the wrong values and thinking mode of "majority theory". Many people say that "a young man without desire is fragile". In fact, in this case, a considerable part is inseparable from this "vulgar outlook on life."

This kind of values not only advocates "hard work will not succeed", but also advocates the wrong values of "people will become vulgar one day, so if they want to live well, they must learn to be vulgar", misleading the majority of young people with the values of middle-aged people, making them willing to be mediocre without knowing it, losing their high spirit and fighting spirit, gradually losing their pursuit of life, and striving for excellent vision and courage to face reality in the process of "adapting to society".

This "outlook on life" is so terrible that we feel quite suffocated. Regrettably, in the real society, these values are often labeled as "the only way to face the cruel reality", "adapt to society", "realism" and "pragmatism", trying to whitewash them into "realistic values" to cover up their vulgar, hypocritical and dirty value dirt in order to seek ignorance, power desire and self-interest.

It has created a group of "three noes" youths without ideals, directions and responsibilities, but not many people can see the true face of this vulgar reality "outlook on life" and applaud it. It's really sad and "sad for its misfortune, angry for its indisputable"!

True realism should be a value orientation of independent thinking and not blindly following, a pragmatic thinking of caring about real life and seeing the essence through phenomena, and an ideological weapon of caring for the world and promoting social progress with ideals, but it must not be a pseudoscience and shield that holds high the banner of realism but moves against the historical trend, promotes vulgar values and poisons society!

"Better lonely than vulgar" is not all a fallacy in life, while vulgar realism is neither realism nor the correct values in the face of reality, and it runs counter to "pragmatism". It is a bad social trend of thought that deviates from Marxist values, a pseudo-science and pseudo-values under extreme utilitarianism, its original sin of "approaching realism" and its absurd value orientation.

As Franklin said, "Some people die at the age of 25 and are buried at the age of 70".

Ideals and beliefs are the "calcium" of life. Without ideals and beliefs, life will lose its direction and even become a "walking corpse."

When a young man easily falls into the "pit" of vulgar realistic "outlook on life", he will have to give up his desire to work hard and make progress actively, and will unconsciously reduce his life distribution, and eventually slowly lose motivation, waste time and waste his life.

As everyone knows, behind all amazing lives are strict self-management and continuous efforts. "When and what to do" is not a universal truth, and vulgar realism should never be the pursuit of life we should follow!

"No one can succeed casually". The real life is not achieved by vulgar realism, let alone by "outlook on life" and "looking at life", but by our step-by-step efforts and permanent struggle.

Only when we have lofty ideals, conform to the historical trend, get rid of this vulgar realistic value that makes society smoky, and arm ourselves with materialistic scientific value fashion, can we truly shoulder the inheritance of good virtues and a sense of responsibility for society, correctly handle our relationship with society, and realize the value of life in serving the people and contributing to society.

Face a lie and keep your eyes open. Only by rejecting vulgar realistic values can we truly create a beautiful and happy life, because a truly wonderful life depends on our own mastery and creation!