How will China respond to the US-Japan joint military exercise?

First, strive to solve major domestic contradictions and problems.

At present, it is impossible to unite and win the hearts of the people without effectively cracking down on corruption, adjusting the pattern of interest distribution and restoring fairness and justice to alleviate social contradictions, so it is very risky to deal with major domestic and international events.

The second is to adjust the strategic thinking and guiding ideology.

We have always stressed that the two major themes of international peace and development have not changed, but we have avoided "the jungle law of survival of the fittest will remain unchanged on the earth for hundreds of millions of years" and "limited resources determine that national competition is an eternal theme". Today's China should change from simply hiding its strength mechanically to "combining rigidity with softness, using military ceremony". We should clearly understand the jungle law of the global village, unless there are rare and accidental circumstances, there will not be so many win-win situations. Only Ah Q always insists on "win-win" when he is wronged and loses money, which will only increase the laughing stock.

When necessary, in times of crisis, China should dare to fight for the defense principle and stick to the bottom line, and even have the courage and determination to "lose both sides" when necessary. Under normal circumstances, of course, no one wants to lose, and no one wants to lose both. However, you must prepare a bright sword for the opponent's propulsion and containment, the opponent's aggressive deterrence and cruel means, and at least make it clear:-You want me to die, I won't let you live; If you want to break my leg, I will break at least five of your fingers! The determination and bloodiness to destroy each other at an extraordinary moment is also an ingenious game, a guarantee to defend dignity and the price of national death! Only such great wisdom and courage can deter sophisticated and ferocious opponents.

Third, there must be independence and originality commensurate with a big country.

China's 5,000-year historical evolution, apart from civilization and culture, the essence of dynasty change is also a chapter full of strategic contests. New China was founded by the people's army's war history of "winning more with fewer, and winning the best with inferior". Why should we win more with less, and win the best with inferior? Of course, defeat the enemy with the wisdom and courage of the leader and the whole team! Unfortunately, it seems that China, the East that has always won by cleverness, is often at a disadvantage and disadvantage in the competition with today's rivals. From the strategic layout and deterrence of the United States, from the political arms purchase of Taiwan Province Province, from the economic currency card, the international petroleum energy and iron ore pricing card, as well as the layout of China's industrial chain by foreign capital, special funds for experts in China, etc. We can see the tough style and scheming originality of many opponents.

Sometimes we lack wisdom, sometimes we are rash and naive, then we are passive, and sometimes our courage binds our wisdom. We should reflect on whether it is necessary to continue to support our export champion with huge resource consumption and cheap labor in the economy, and whether it is necessary to continuously increase or maintain such a large amount of US dollar foreign exchange reserves that depend on the sense of responsibility of others. Moreover, militarily, the Sino-Russian exercises and the SCO exercises can be more high-profile, instead of always following the United States and claiming to be "anti-terrorism" exercises, which will constrain the scope and scale of our actions. Look at the military exercises between the United States and South Korea and the United States and Japan. People are aboveboard national deterrence, and there is no counter-terrorism in their words. We should also justify military actions to defend national sovereignty and national dignity according to different military situations and imaginary enemies.

The fourth is to clean up the so-called think tanks and elites.

Some think tanks have a great influence on the decision-making of the state administrative departments, and are not trivial to the future of the country and the interests of the people. In recent years, there are more and more victims of China's political and economic interests, and a large number of think tank experts should be investigated and purged. He's a wimp. Stop. This is a spy arrest. The father-in-law who said that foreigners' face is important everywhere and nonsense that "it is outdated to solve national disputes by military action" doesn't even have the common sense that military is an extension of politics and the backing of economy and diplomacy. It can be described as extremely retarded (or his identity is incompatible with our family, deliberately muddling the water), so he can really rest and shut up.

Hey, if you talk too much, you'll get caught. I am helpless