Why is Simpson innocent in civil and guilty in criminal cases?

He is innocent in criminal cases and guilty in civil cases.

(1) The determination of guilt in criminal cases is based on several basic principles of criminal justice. This case, which was considered as Simpson's conviction in the United States, is classic, not because Simpson is a villain who escaped legal punishment, but because it embodies the high pursuit of procedural legitimacy in the Anglo-American criminal justice system. It also reflects the height of the rule of law in the United States. No citizen can be convicted by criminal justice under reasonable doubt. There is evidence in Simpson's case, but due to the illegal procedures in obtaining evidence, several key evidences are directly polluted and directly excluded. There is also a key issue in this case, which involves the racist tendency of American society. Simpson's defense lawyers used this to help Simpson win the support of colored Americans and juries.

(2) In terms of civil affairs, because the United States adopts criminal and civil cases to be tried separately, there will be another set of proof standards for whether Simpson's injury behavior caused compensation in civil cases, which is much lower than that in criminal cases. According to which standard, Simpson can be found guilty and need to bear civil liability for compensation, but this matter is no longer ignored, and the criminal case is over and can no longer be convicted.