How to explain graduation thesis defense

How to explain graduation thesis defense

How to carefully prepare graduation thesis defense, many people have to do graduation thesis defense near graduation, but how to carefully prepare a complete thesis requires skills and methods. Here are some questions about how to explain the defense of graduation thesis.

How to explain 1 nonsense in graduation thesis defense and win time?

When the judges ask questions and you don't know where to start at once, you might as well say some nonsense and take over the topic first. If your question is good, you should seriously consider and treat it in my future work. The question you just asked is: Why is quality the lifeline of an enterprise? It is nonsense to say that quality is the lifeline of an enterprise ... but it also conforms to people's habit of answering questions. This will buy you limited time to sort out your thoughts, search the memory materials in your mind, and then explain them in an orderly way. Therefore, the role of nonsense can not be underestimated.

Rhetorically correct, using static braking.

Although many jobs are different in nature, once summarized, the rules of work and measures to do a good job are similar, such as strengthening study, perfecting the system, putting measures in place and highlighting key points. For example, when the judges ask you what measures you are going to take to do a good job, and you are not familiar with this job, you may wish to get in touch with it properly so as to keep changing.

Good words are right, control your emotions.

Sometimes the judges' questions are not so much questions as opinions, but on this special occasion, if you accidentally ask them, you will not be able to step down. So when answering such questions, don't talk big, meaningless words. The best choice is to say good words, sincerely admit the shortcomings, and promise to pay attention to improvement in the future. For example, the judges asked: The general office should be a comprehensive service department. Why can leaders buy tickets on business trips, but our employees can't buy tickets on business trips? Answering such a question is not clear in one or two sentences. A competitor replied: in our work, such problems may indeed occur, and I am deeply sorry for this. I didn't do it well last time, but I will do it well next time. If you encounter such a problem, you can ask me directly and I will try my best to solve it. "A few kind words make both the questioner and the audience feel comfortable.

Good joke, lively atmosphere.

Some judges ask sharp questions, forcing you to express your position on the spot and putting you in a dilemma. For example, several judges unanimously challenged a comrade who was competing for the post of director of infrastructure: Our unit will requisition 2,000 mu of land. Can you guarantee to get the land within one year? Give me $200,000. I'm not sure. Generally speaking, the problem can be solved in one year, but as far as I know, there are dozens of farmers on that land, and demolition is the most thoughtful issue in the process of land acquisition. If you encounter several nail households, the progress will be affected. But I will try to finish this arduous task in a year or so. The first few words of the competitor caused a burst of laughter, which made the tense atmosphere of hand-to-hand combat suddenly relaxed. The next few words, objective and true, won the understanding and praise of the judges.

Words are not sour, but add elegance.

If the prose is rather bookish, using expressions such as expressing sui, metaphor, association and quotation can make the defense literary, but it must be used properly to avoid giving people an elegant and sour feeling. If the judges ask a young candidate: What is the most important quality for a young manager to do a good job? Some people say it is modesty, some people say it is diligence, and some people say it is pragmatic. what do you think? Although the questioner listed several answers, his purpose is obviously not to let you do multiple-choice questions, but to rule out the general possible answers and let you find another way and make new bold answers. The competitor answered brilliantly: "Modesty, diligence and pragmatism are all qualities that young cadres should possess. In addition, I would like to quote two poems by Comrade Mao Zedong to answer your question. One was written by him when he was young:' If the midstream hits the water, the waves will stop the flying boat'; Another sentence was written in his later years:' No matter how stormy it is, it is better to walk around.' For a young man, the most valuable quality is that the newborn calf is not afraid of tigers, and is foolhardy and fearless in every major event. "

How to explain graduation thesis defense II? Identify test sites.

The purpose of defense is to test whether a person's reaction is agile, resourceful and coherent, and then to test his breadth of knowledge, depth of thinking level and height of theoretical level. In the process of defense, the most taboo situation is that you can't pick up the words, you can't speak every time, you stutter, and there are many loopholes. So first of all, we should pay special attention to answering words quickly and clearly. Generally speaking, it is better to answer with the structure of "first, second and third" or "first, second and third".

Analysis questions.

There are generally two kinds of interview defense: objective questions and subjective questions. Objective questions have standard answers, while subjective questions may have multiple answers. Relatively speaking, there are few objective questions and many subjective questions. This provides a broad space for competitors to play freely, so be full of confidence and avoid being in a hurry. As long as they don't stray from the theme and play their level normally, they will certainly be able to pass the test calmly. If we can let the sparks of new ideas break out from time to time, the effect will be better.

Predictive problem.

The purpose of post competition is very clear, that is, competitors prove that they are more qualified for a certain job than others by explaining and expounding their own experiences, achievements, advantages and working ideas. The judges also asked questions from these main aspects: questions related to your experience, questions related to the position you are competing for, and questions related to the current policy situation. As a competitor, you can pay attention to these aspects in advance, concretize the possible problems and summarize the key points in advance. If the questions raised by the judges are consistent with or similar to those you thought of in advance, you can talk to Kan Kan calmly; If the questions you ask are different from what you think, you can also graft wisely and assemble flexibly, and you will never choke to death on the spot.

Set a trap on purpose.

That is, in the process of competitive defense, some concepts and ideas were consciously put forward, but they were not elaborated in depth. In the process of defense, we should naturally slow down the speech and strengthen the tone to highlight these problems, attract the attention of the judges and lure them to ask questions. For example, when a competitor talked about the idea of doing a good job in market research, he specifically talked about the problem of ideas and methods, but subtly mentioned: "In addition, we should pay attention to strengthening the team building of the sales department." Sure enough, some judges broke the sand pot and asked: "What measures are you going to take to strengthen team building? This question is right in the trap of competitors. Give me a question, give you a wonderful, natural and perfect one.