Chicken or egg first?

Chicken or egg is an unscientific proposition. Let's take a step back to 654.38+00,000 to discuss that chickens and eggs are the same creature, and creatures appear as a population. For one chicken in this population, the chicken comes before the egg, and for another chicken, the egg comes before the chicken. For the whole population, it follows the probability distribution, that is, half of the chickens in the whole population have the egg first and the other half have the egg first! In other words, for chickens, chickens and eggs are produced at the same time!

If you still don't believe me, read the following story!

Chicken or egg first? This is an old and difficult problem to solve.

Legend has it that Zhuge Liang has three spirits. Zhou Yu asked Zhuge Liang a difficult question: which came first, the chicken or the egg? Zhuge Liang replied: there was a chicken first. Zhou Yu said with a smile, no chicken, no eggs. Zhuge Liang asked: If the first egg is an egg, what about the chicken? Zhou Yuyi was speechless, his anger was born from the outside, his blood was wet from the inside, and he began to vomit blood.

This folk story is far-fetched, full of loopholes, and has no substantive help to the answer to the "egg mystery". Zhou Yu's questioning is puzzling. Zhuge Liang's rhetorical question is full of sophistry. However, from this folktale, we can feel how radiant, deeply rooted in people's hearts and how "Theory of Three Represents" the "egg dispute" is.

Chicken or egg first? The "first chicken pie" thinks that eggs are born by chickens, so there are chickens first. The "egg first pie" thinks that chickens are hatched from eggs, so there are eggs first. This is a big trouble in logic. Although eggs are laid by chickens, aren't chickens hatched from eggs? It can be said that chicken is right for eggs! Both sides are caught in a cycle. It's like running in a circle, you can't tell who is in front and who is behind.

Chicken or egg first? Many masters and sages can't answer this eternal question, but I can! Because I am much better than them. . .

I am an out-and-out skeptic. The first thing that comes to mind in this "egg fight" is a joke. The joke goes like this: The driver took part in the "CET-6 interview", and the examiner asked the driver: If there was a man and a cat in front (that is, the kind of animal that caused an uproar in major forums recently), would you hit people or cats? The driver replied without thinking: of course it is a cat! The examiner said: Wrong! You should brake immediately!

Brake immediately! This is the correct answer to the question! The examiner gave the driver a thinking trap! The problem is that you have to jump out of the trap. Only in this way can we have a wide choice. Exactly: the future is boundless, thousands of villages and thousands of townships!

The problem of the "egg dispute" is also here. It is difficult to verify the earliest time when this question was put forward, but it is certain that the background of this question was put forward in the era of science and its underdevelopment. So the first and most important thing to do is not how to answer this question, but to question the scientific nature of this question.

The theory of evolution tells us that any living thing is constantly evolving. So what is a chicken and what is an egg? How to define chicken and egg in time? Chicken or egg first? So what year does this chicken refer to and what year does the egg refer to? Obviously, the object of discussion is ambiguous! From a mathematical point of view, it can only be discussed in this way: which came first, the chicken or the egg? In 2004, which came first, chicken or egg? In 2003, which came first, chicken or egg? . . . And so on until the first year! And the answer is not necessarily the same every year. This means "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" Will present different answers at different discussion times!

Of course, "which came first, the chicken or the egg" is mainly asked in the first year, but the first such question has no basic biological knowledge. Secondly, the person who first raised this question had no basic biological knowledge in his mind. The so-called chicken and egg in this question is a static value, not a dynamic concept! The chickens and eggs here are obviously the chickens and eggs when the question was first raised. Not biological chickens and eggs.

The second problem of this "egg dispute" is that chicken is an egg-laying animal, so chicken and egg are the same creature, not two different creatures! Under such a premise, it is meaningless to discuss whether the chicken or the egg comes first. This is like saying whether a person has a left hand or a right hand first.

And the "egg fight" is really possessed by the above two places. "Chicken or egg first?" Evolved into "chicken or egg first?" . As mentioned above, organisms evolve, and the objects of discussion are both ambiguous. What are chickens and eggs? Can you give a specific time?

Get to the bottom of it: I want the first one, the first one, and I don't need specific time. It's just that if it's the first, it's not a chicken laying eggs!

Take a step back and say, which came first, the chicken or the egg? There are unscientific elements in this entanglement. People who have this idea regard the appearance of creatures as individuals! This is absolutely anti-science! Modern science tells us that creatures appear in groups! In other words, there is no first chicken and egg in the world! Only the first group of chickens and the first group of eggs. The so-called chicken and egg come first, without the entanglement of modern scientific knowledge, possession comes out of nothing!

If creatures appear as individuals. With the first chicken, how can chickens reproduce? The first egg comes first, so how can the egg reproduce?