How to deal with the security situation around China correctly?

The world today is in a historical period of great change. Generally speaking, the current international situation is conducive to the development of China. First of all, it is possible to strive for a peaceful international environment and avoid a new world war for a long time to come. This is a very important strategic judgment and a major premise for us to concentrate on economic construction. As we all know, the contradiction between war and peace and their mutual transformation depend on the contrast and rise and fall of the two forces. As early as the late 1970s to the mid-1980s, Comrade Deng Xiaoping drew a clear line between war and peace with the foresight of a strategist and creatively applied Marxist standpoints, viewpoints and methods. Through dialectical investigation of the contradictory movements of these two forces, he scientifically predicted the development trend of the international situation, pointed out that hegemonism is the general source of contemporary wars, and put forward the famous conclusion that although the danger of war exists, it can be postponed as long as the work is done well. At that time, the general basis of Comrade Deng Xiaoping's conclusion was that "the growth of world peace forces exceeded the growth of war forces" [1]. At the same time, he also brilliantly expounded the question of who to rely on, who to unite with and who to oppose in the efforts to stop the war and maintain peace. In retrospect, Comrade Deng Xiaoping was indeed far-sighted. With the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the bipolar pattern, Comrade Deng Xiaoping's basic estimate can be seen more clearly. The world is developing towards multipolarization, the factors of international checks and balances are increasing, and the forces for peace are further strengthened.

Secondly, in the process of forming the new pattern, various contradictions in the world are developing in depth, various forces are re-dividing and combining, and various major strategic relations are also adjusting and changing. As the law of unbalanced economic and political development of capitalism continues to play a role, contradictions within and among western countries are increasingly exposed and rising, and domestic troubles and foreign invasion are increasing. This has created many new opportunities for us to formulate strategies in the international struggle. As long as we are good at grasping some major strategic relations and making good use of some important contradictions, we will be able to respond flexibly and take measures freely to adapt to the development of the international situation and further improve China's international status.

Third, compared with other parts of the world, the situation in the Asia-Pacific region has remained relatively stable, the economic ties and cooperation among countries have become increasingly close, and the original hot issues have been or are being solved politically. The security environment around China has been continuously improved, and the good-neighborly relations with neighboring countries are in the best period since the founding of the People's Republic of China.

These conditions and factors provide a better external environment for us to concentrate on developing the national economy. As Comrade Deng Xiaoping pointed out, favorable international environment and domestic conditions are good opportunities for us to accelerate development. We must cherish and seize the current favorable opportunity, further emancipate our minds, seek truth from facts, forge ahead in unity, work hard, accelerate the pace of reform, opening up and modernization, and strive for new victories in building Socialism with Chinese characteristics.

We should see the favorable side of the international situation as well as the unfavorable and even severe side, and we should not underestimate the turbulent factors in the international situation. Especially the senior cadres of our party and army, should have a clear understanding of this. It must be noted that the world today is not peaceful, and the two major issues of peace and development that people all over the world have long been concerned about and fighting for have not been solved. Comrade Deng Xiaoping profoundly pointed out: "I hope the cold war will end, but now I am disappointed. It may be that one cold war ended and the other two cold wars began again. " The development of the international situation has proved that Comrade Deng Xiaoping's foresight is completely correct. At present, world socialism is at a low tide, and international hostile forces have stepped up their infiltration and subversive activities against socialist countries. In this regard, we must remain vigilant and never take it lightly. Hegemonism and power politics have become the main obstacles to world peace and development. In the past, some ethnic contradictions, religious disputes and territorial disputes covered up by the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union have become increasingly prominent, which have constantly triggered bloody conflicts and local wars and are spreading. The international military struggle is also very complicated. Although some progress has been made in arms control and disarmament negotiations, the arms race is shifting to the high-tech field, which will have an inestimable impact on the international and Asia-Pacific military struggle situation.

Although the new world war and the all-out war against China will not last long, the factors that induce local wars, armed conflicts and domestic local social unrest still exist. Although the competition of comprehensive national strength based on economic and scientific strength has become the dominant aspect of international struggle, military means still play an important role. Although the great cause of the motherland's reunification has made continuous progress, some new and complicated factors have emerged. In such a changeable and complicated international environment, we should be good at synthesis rather than one-sided, development rather than static, and contact rather than non-contact? What's the matter with you? Servant? What is the real mu number of "chasing Cong Yongnian and asking Pu Zhao"? Hey? プ プ? Xiong Tu? Noisy Correction? Do you think that shit is strong and tolerant? Refuting that the head of Tantan Group in the affected province has returned to China? br/>； In short, we should fully assess the favorable factors, seize the rare opportunity, strengthen foreign work and exchanges, expand China's room for manoeuvre in the international community, enhance its initiative in handling international affairs, and create better external conditions for domestic development, so as to help us accelerate the pace of reform, opening up and modernization, concentrate on doing a good job in the national economy, and constantly improve China's comprehensive national strength. This is the basis for ensuring the long-term stability of the country and consolidating and developing the cause of Socialism with Chinese characteristics. At the same time, we should clearly face up to the unfavorable factors, strengthen research, make careful plans, make correct decisions, work hard, and strive to turn disadvantages into advantages, so as to be prepared. Just because there are many things that are beneficial to us in the international situation, we should not be blindly optimistic, take it lightly and relax our necessary vigilance; Nor should we attach too much importance to the international situation because there are still things that are not conducive to us, be blindly nervous, and even shake our determination to devote ourselves to economic construction. These are obviously incorrect and do not conform to the objective reality. It can be said that the favorable side of the current international situation is still the main one. As long as we insist on calm observation, calm response, never take the lead, do something wrong, seize the opportunity that the international situation is conducive to China's economic development, and do domestic affairs wholeheartedly, we can calmly deal with all kinds of complicated situations and be invincible.

Throughout China's security environment, whether it is political or economic issues, whether it is external military threats, obstacles to the reunification of the motherland or domestic instability, most of them are directly or indirectly related to hegemonism and power politics, and most of them can see the shadow of hegemonism and power politics. In this regard, we must be strategically far-sighted. We must resolutely oppose acts that harm our national interests and sovereignty. Of course, the method of struggle should be flexible.

Without correct military strategic policy, a country and nation cannot survive, develop and stand on its feet in the fierce international environment. In the current complicated and changeable international situation, in order to grasp the strategic initiative, we must establish a correct mtwb: How should China deal with the "containment" of the United States?

First, there are structural contradictions between China and the United States, so we should have a long-term strategy for US relations and don't hold too much hope.

As I said in my past information, there are double contradictions between China and the United States. First, there are ideological and institutional contradictions. As the largest democratic country in the world, the theory of democracy, freedom and human rights has always been the foundation and value system of the United States. In foreign relations, the United States inevitably divides other countries into enemies and friends based on ideological and institutional differences, and the theory of democracy and freedom is also a powerful weapon for the United States to interfere in other countries and exclude dissidents, and the United States will not give up easily. China is the largest producer in the world. The so-called democracy, freedom and human rights were denounced by China as "Western way" and resolutely rejected. This ideological and institutional contradiction between China and the United States is doomed to make it difficult for China and the United States to establish a real strategic cooperative relationship. On the contrary, friction and conflict should be the normal state of China and the United States. The China administration's attempt to downplay the ideological differences between the two sides by "seeking common ground while reserving differences" and seek to establish a strategic partnership with the United States is undoubtedly to seek fish from the wood. The second is geopolitical contradiction. As a global hegemon, the United States occupies a dominant position in East Asia, and its dominant position in East Asia is also the fruit of the victory of the United States over Japan in World War II. In order to protect this achievement, the United States fought two more wars after World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Therefore, the United States will not easily give up its dominance in East Asia. As a superpower in East Asia in history, China's rise and revival of China is destined to regain its dominant position in East Asia, which will inevitably conflict with the sphere of influence and hegemony of the United States in East Asia.

Second, if the Sino-US conflict is confined to East Asia, China will be passive everywhere.

China's interests in East Asia are related to China's core interests, and China often has little room for manoeuvre. Looking back at the past two conflicts between China and the United States (Korean War and Vietnam War), it was the close pressure from the United States that made China have no way out and had to stand up and resist. On the surface, ideology leads to war, but in fact, geopolitics leads to war. The symbol of China's rise and revival is to regain its dominance in East Asia. If China can't gain the initiative and dominance at its own doorstep, on the contrary, the United States will draw its own power boundary to the doorstep of China. The rise of China and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation are a joke, and it is difficult for China to win the respect of other countries. What about the East? Remote? What's the matter with you? Acts? What's wrong with the trap? Even call? What's wrong with the trap? Resist Hello? Hey? Take it? Command? Hey? Vent? Oh, my god. How about xinlinyan? Block c? Amaranth table? Gold? *? Is the leaf disaster leaking around the cockroach? What is your ambition? Wish? Hey? Tu? Leak? Oh, my god. Take it? What? Vent? What's the matter with you? Pull? Vent? Even the Huai tau funny? Zhihuan? What about R-ring correction? 庑┱? Is the deer venting? Hey? Hey? Vent? Hey? Huh? What's the matter with you? *? Leaf disaster? What is your ambition? Blame? What's the problem? What's the problem? ⒏? Yi siting ba mouhuan? Buy an alma mater? Bad ┍ Xie Rong? See the bar? Hey? Hey? Vent? Sex? Prostitution? What's the hurry? Climbing a mountain in the harbor? Shrimp u? Is it bad to burn it? Change and vent? Song? ざ? Choking shrimp: pushing the steps? Legs and swords? What is your record? ⑾@? Do you want to stop the rabbit? How far are you from raising your father? Sacrococcygeal leakage? Hey? Attached? Chasing h Where's the blue key mushroom? Pull? Stop? What happened? Sun? Silk moisture rice heart? Hey? タタ タ? S economy? What happened to the ass? What happened? Na Wei Yu Weiwei? Hey? br/>； Third, in East Asia, we should dare to respond tit-for-tat to the interference and intimidation of the United States and curb the further containment of China by the United States.

The return of American aircraft carriers to the South China Sea and the Yellow Sea indicates that the Obama administration's China policy has undergone major adjustments. In terms of China's perceived core interests, we should be tough against tough, and pre-emptively attack China's self-confidence and national dignity in the early days of China's rise. I think this adjustment is tentative at present. If China continues to pursue the policy of keeping a low profile and making concessions to the United States, the strategic containment of China by the United States will be even worse, and it will also greatly inspire the confidence of neighboring countries in China to resist China. Therefore, China must respond strongly to American provocation. If the US aircraft carrier returns to the Yellow Sea, China needs to readjust its Northeast Asia policy, change its ambiguous attitude and be afraid of offending the United States. First of all, it must be clearly pointed out that the US-South Korea military exercise has gone beyond the necessary scope and has threatened peace and stability in Northeast Asia. The military presence of the United States in Northeast Asia and the military threat to North Korea are the root causes of the North Korean nuclear issue. We should support North Korea morally and temporarily suspend the six-party talks on the Korean nuclear issue. Telling South Korea to increase its military alliance policy with the United States will only make South Korea more dangerous. Cooperate with North Korea, increase the suppression of Lee Myung-bak's regime, overthrow Lee Myung-bak's regime, and urge South Korea to return to the policy of estrangement from the United States and reconciliation with North Korea during Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun.

On the South China Sea issue, we should dare to accept the provocation of the United States, isolate and attack those anticlimactic Vietnamese, and lead the United States to contain China. First, impose economic sanctions on Vietnam, restrict investment and import in Vietnam, and gradually require China enterprises to withdraw their capital from Vietnam. Increase military strength in the South China Sea, strengthen Vietnam's military presence in the sphere of influence controlled by the South China Sea, increase pressure and war threat to Vietnam through friction and provocation, and interfere with Vietnam's economic construction. If it accidentally goes off, we will take the opportunity to recapture the Vietnamese-occupied China island. After recovering the islands occupied by Vietnam, it can turn into a defensive posture in the South China Sea and East Asia, stick to China's vested interests and sit tight. Now, the new Philippine government openly opposes the US involvement in the South China Sea issue. China should adopt a policy of discriminating against such countries, give certain economic benefits to the Philippines, freeze its dispute with the Philippines, and prevent the Sino-Vietnamese dispute from turning into a dispute with ASEAN. By uniting most of the southeast? Remote? What about aluminum? Pomelo nuggets? What's wrong with the shrimp? Song Ф wheel drain? br/>； Fourth, deal with the strategic containment of the United States from an all-round and global perspective.

China and the United States have different interests in East Asia. China's interests in East Asia are core interests and it is difficult to make major concessions, while the interests of the United States in East Asia are non-core interests and can be further adjusted. If the confrontation and conflict between China and the United States is confined to East Asia, it is obvious that China is in an extremely unfavorable position, and it is difficult for China to win an all-round victory over the United States. Therefore, China should jump out of East Asia and compete with the United States in core interests. For example, on the Iranian nuclear issue, the United States obviously holds double standards. China should support Iran's just demand, support Iran's nuclear exchange program with Turkey and Brazil, and resolutely oppose the plans of the United States and the European Union to further sanction Iraq. Support Iran's request to inspect Israel and openly criticize the United States' double standards on the Middle East nuclear issue. If China can change its foreign policy of compromise and dare not uphold justice, it will regain the respect of the third world countries, especially the Arab countries. Second, it can strike back at the US containment policy towards China, hurting America's weakness, thus truly prompting the United States to reflect on its containment policy towards China and respect China's core interests.

Fifth, confrontation with the United States should master the rhythm and gradually escalate according to the reaction of the United States.

Obviously, the recent US policy toward China is in an adjustment period and a tentative period. China's response should also be reasonably restrained, with the main purpose of forcing the United States to abandon its containment policy towards China and respect China's status as a great power and core interests. In view of what the United States is doing in the Yellow Sea and South China Sea, China should make a strong counterattack on the issues of North Korea, Vietnam and Iran, and not be afraid of escalating confrontation with the United States. If the United States openly arms Vietnam, directly enters the South China Sea, or sells F 16 to Taiwan Province Province, it will escalate the confrontation with China. China can also bring the same level of manpower.