What historical evidence did Korean netizens list to prove that Hanfu copied Hanfu?

How to treat Korean netizens calling Hanfu Hanfu?

The dispute between Hanfu and Hanfu can be traced back to Korean netizens: Don't care about people who forget their ancestors after plastic surgery-Introduction. JUNG WOO got into trouble with Korean netizens? Sorry, I stood up straight this time.

The competition between China culture and Korean culture has never stopped. Even many things originally belonging to China culture will be blatantly "occupied" by Korean netizens, and the most distressing thing is that many ignorant China netizens will also say that things from China culture are Korean.

Hanfu in Ming Dynasty is a typical example. Xu Kai took a selfie on his personal social platform because of the new drama Staff Sergeant. In the photo, Soso is wearing Amin Hanfu.

Regret for the Past is another cooperative work with Wu after Biography of Yan Xi Palace. It tells a story that happened in the Ming Dynasty, so the shape of Soso is naturally the shape of the Ming Dynasty.

However, a ridiculous picture appeared in the comments below. Many netizens said, "When did you become a Korean? Is this a Korean drama? "

The appearance of these comments fully shows that these people lack cultural knowledge, and also shows that the popularity of culture needs to be improved.

In other words, the erosion and plunder of Korean culture in recent years has exposed its disadvantages. You know, the influx of Korean dramas and Han Xing once made the atmosphere of advocating South Korea prevail, which helped the cultural self-confidence of Korean netizens to some extent, so they were so arrogant.

Seeing this, JUNG WOO forwarded the selfie of Soso and responded to the controversy of netizens. He said: "This orthodox Hanfu of the Ming Dynasty cannot be called' Hanfu' because it was used by North Korea in the Ming Dynasty!"

Later, some authoritative cultural accounts also responded to the controversy that Hanfu originated from Hanfu and claimed that this statement was a joke. Ancient Korea (then counted as Korea) did not have its own costumes. They improved the costumes according to the Ming dynasty, and finally formed the costumes that everyone saw in Korean dramas.

However, Korean netizens will not give up, and they will hang on the Korean Internet to denounce the stupidity and ignorance of netizens in Zheng Zheng and China. In this way, JUNG WOO was scolded by Korean netizens and caused a heated discussion in China.

Korean netizens wanted to produce evidence that costumes originated in China in the Ming Dynasty, so Zheng Yu really sent a short composition to repay Korean netizens who didn't learn history well. China has not only Ming and Han costumes, but also many cultural treasures such as Chinese medicine, dance, painting, calligraphy and martial arts.

While retaliating against the ignorance of Korean netizens, everyone also left a message under the social account to let him go back quickly. The plundering of culture is intolerable.

Facts have proved that Zheng Yu is really not afraid of anyone. This time, his response did not disappoint netizens. JUNG WOO responded: "They can even move the five senses given by their parents at will. Isn't arrogance normal? I don't care about these ancestors' sticks. Facts speak louder than words! " JUNG WOO's implication is to vomit the wind of cosmetic surgery brought by the Korean Wave.

In fact, this is not the first time that Korean netizens have provoked and desecrated China culture. Their plundering of China culture has always been so justified, and their words also reveal contempt and malice, such as the sensational "Dragon Boat Festival World Heritage Application" incident.

However, the most heartbreaking thing is that some domestic netizens' views on right and wrong are not perfect. Not only did they not condemn these actions of the ROK, but they even fanned the flames to expand these negative effects and exposed their ignorance.

South Korea successfully applied for the World Heritage gangneung danoje festival, but it was brought to the rhythm by a willing heart. There was a saying on the Internet that South Korea "registered" the Dragon Boat Festival and that "China will pay for the Dragon Boat Festival in the future". Finally, experts came forward to clarify and let netizens know that this was a misunderstanding. The Gangneung Dragon Boat Festival in South Korea is not the same as the Dragon Boat Festival in China, but the time is the same. China Dragon Boat Festival has been successfully applied for, and our traditional festival finally has a name.

Although it was a misunderstanding, from this incident, the ambition of Korean netizens to provoke and plunder China culture was gradually exposed. We always hear Korean netizens say from time to time that "Korean ancestors nurtured the Yellow River civilization."

They said, "movable type printing was invented in Korea." They said, "Li Shizhen is Korean, too."

After the endless provocation, China netizens who were angry were angry, but they laughed comically and quipped: "The whole world belongs to South Korea."

The Dragon Boat Festival incident has turned over, but this can't hide the confidence of Korean netizens in the mystery of their own culture, so there will be this "Hanfu Hanfu dispute".

There is also an incident in which Han Fu was ridiculed by Korean netizens in the Ming Dynasty, which also aroused the thinking of domestic netizens. We should not just worship foreign things blindly, but gain a sense of identity and responsibility by strengthening our understanding of our own culture.

The difference between Hanfu and Hanfu

A friend told me that her school held a Hanfu rite of passage. As a result, some students' parents said it was Korean Hanfu, and many boys thought they were wearing Japanese kimonos. God, why don't so many people in my country even know Hanfu?

Although the times have been progressing, I think the traditional culture of every country and nation remains unchanged. Hanfu is a traditional costume of China culture. Even if Hanfu, Kimono and Hanfu have great similarities, there are many differences!

Hanbok is the fusion of Hanbok in Tang Dynasty in China and local costumes on Korean Peninsula, which is greatly influenced by Hanbok to some extent. Women's Hanbok presents the curves of tops and long skirts, sleeves, beautiful shapes of white overskirt and skirts, and most of them are very colorful.

Kimono is the national costume of Japan. In fact, before the Tang Dynasty, the color of Japanese kimono was relatively simple, mostly original, and almost all the costumes were the same color. However, under the influence of Tang Wenhua, the colors of kimono began to become rich, and Japanese kimono also entered its heyday. Kimono sleeves are square, the belt is wide, and the whole kimono is straight.

Hanfu takes Chinese etiquette as the core and shows the unique features of the Han nationality. Hanfu, on the other hand, is changeable in collar, skirt type and length. Wearing a stand-up collar and a right-breasted shirt is the most typical feature of Hanfu, and the Hanfu culture of tops and skirts has a far-reaching influence on Hanfu and kimono.

In order to rob China Hanfu culture, he deliberately launched Hanfu Challenge.

Koreans compete for Hanfu culture in China.

Accurately speaking, China painter painted Chinese clothes first, and was framed by Koreans to copy Hanbok, which is just an excuse for "Koreans robbing China Hanbok culture". If Koreans want to compete for Hanfu elements, they need to go through a channel, that is, first see the painter draw Chinese-style clothes.

Later, in order to refute the Korean story, the painter used the movie stills of Longmen Feijian, embroidered spring knives, Hanfu activity "Chinese businessman Kyushu" and even the unearthed cultural relics collected in the museum as evidence, but they were ignored by Koreans. From here, it's not that Koreans don't understand history, but that they want to despise history by playing dumb. It's just that they told too many lies and even believed them.

Koreans don't even have faces.

With the fermentation of things, this group of Koreans even lost face. Netizens in China regard unearthed cultural relics as evidence, while Koreans say that "Hanfu influenced Hanfu" or choose to play the fool.

In order to completely rob their so-called Hanbok, they even launched a Hanbok challenge, mobilized Korean painters to draw Hanbok, and proved that Hanbok copied Hanbok with pictures. Judging from the "Hanfu" painted by Koreans, they not only refused to admit that Hanfu originated from Hanfu, but took the opportunity to take more and more Hanfu costumes and elements as their own. In order to refute this statement, China painters also launched the "Hanfu Challenge" activity.

What's even more unexpected is that while the competition of Hanfu elements is so fierce and it shines brilliantly, behind the netizens in China, there is a "backstab". Shiny and warm at this critical moment, the clothing launched is obviously Amin Hanfu, but it is said to be "Hanfu". Take the initiative to offer Hanfu made in Ming Dynasty as "Hanfu". To tell the truth, this kneeling position is really ugly.

The operation of flash warming caused dissatisfaction among players in China. However, knowing that he angered China players, he still "pretended to be dead". Not only did he not take off Hanbok in name, but he didn't even apologize.

Many domestic players said that sharping Warm only needs to turn off the national costume, so sharping Warm will want to kneel down to the Koreans, and there is no need to look at the faces of China players. Moreover, sharping Wennuan has never seen the faces of players in China, which has caused dissatisfaction among China players many times, but sharping Wennuan still goes his own way and still holds high the Koreans.

This time, the shining and warm operation fully reflected the shining and warm position and attitude, and also let us thoroughly see the face of that pile of paper. Who can give away traditional culture and traditional costumes? Do you remember who your ancestors were?