Why do some folk disciplines always oppose the theories of Darwin, Newton and Einstein?

In fact, this question does not hold water. Not only some people deny the theory of evolution, but also some people oppose the theory of relativity. Moreover, opposing and attacking Darwin, Einstein, Newton and other most famous scientists and their theories is the favorite of folk themes.

Darwin, the originator of evolution, is respected and commemorated by the mainstream of human society.

Only some religious schools of ghosts and gods, their admirers and fools oppose evolution. This is just a countercurrent in the history of human civilization and progress, and there will be several bubbles, which will never stop the mighty trend of progress.

There are also many people who deny Newton's classical mechanics, gravity and Einstein's theory of relativity. These people are the so-called "people's subjects", and they are also a small countercurrent against evolution, which does not damage the greatness of these theories.

The plaintiffs are, and Mei, who are said to be outstanding figures in folk science. They and some folk heroes who came to help out gathered in the big bed room of Home Inn near the court to discuss how to deal with the trial. But he deviated from the theme and began to denounce the mistake of relativity, thinking it was outrageous.

This is why a folk student who came to help out spoke excitedly against the theory of relativity.

They are eager to express their plots and desires, waving their arms and rushing to talk, and their voices are louder than one. And how to prepare for the trial stayed.

A "folk science" person used the gap between classes in school to tell students the fallacies of anti-evolution theory, so he published an article about Shell.com to expose and refute these erroneous remarks. After reading it, the students felt misled and reported this character to the school. The school punished him, canceled his substitute qualification and deducted 30% of his allowance.

Therefore, this person felt persecuted by Bruno, so he took Beijing Guo Ke Interactive Technology Media Co., Ltd. as the first defendant.

These "people's subjects" sued for a public apology and compensation of 500,000 yuan for spiritual comfort. Originally they wanted to add a little more, but the lawyer said it was on the top.

This lawsuit has no result for the time being.

The defendants' lawyers had prepared a detailed defense, but it was useless, because at the beginning of the trial, they found that these plaintiffs did not elaborate and debate the core issues and the controversial points of the original appeal at all, but kept talking about things unrelated to the case itself and repeatedly questioned the impartiality of the judge.