In today's society, how many children do you think it is better to have at home?

In today's society, I think it is better to have a child at home.

① The economic pressure is too great.

If nothing else, it is said that the cost of children attending kindergarten is not low. As far as kindergartens in our village are concerned, a child's monthly tuition fee is 780 yuan, so kindergartens should always buy textbooks for children, such as picture books. We want to buy 200 yuan for every textbook in kindergarten here. We also need to order garden clothes, milk and so on, which are extra charges. In other words, the fixed expenditure of raising a child every month will exceed 1000. This is still the kindergarten in the village. If it is a big city, it is more expensive for children to go to kindergarten. If a family has two or three children, then the pressure is even greater, and one child is just right.

If the in-laws don't help with the children, then one of the husband and wife will have to sacrifice his job to take care of the children full-time. Then the family lost an income. If you take care of the children, after three years, the mother or father who takes care of the baby full-time can return to the workplace. If you have two or three children, you can only work alone to support the whole family for at least 5-6 years. This pressure is too great.

Children go to primary school and junior high school. Although education is compulsory, what aspects of food, clothing, housing and transportation do children need money? One child can barely afford it, let alone two or three children. Now a child's clothes and a pair of shoes cost two or three hundred. You have to change clothes all year round, and the cost is not a decimal. It is also necessary to report children to remedial classes and interest classes, and children should not be allowed to lose at the starting line. These classes are charged by the hour, and more children really can't afford them.

In the future, when a child marries or marries, a bride price or dowry should be prepared for the child. This is no joke. How can two or three children buy a house and a car for their children?

So from an economic point of view, I think it is better to have a child at home.

2 limited energy.

If the mother takes care of the baby full-time, a child is just right. Without the help of in-laws, it would be nice for a mother to barely accompany her children to dinner. If two or three children come, it is estimated that mother can't even drink saliva. My sister has two children at home, and others envy her for having two children, but only we know how hard her life is. Every day, she is in hot water. Either the boss hits the second, or the second robs the boss. She is either ill or has a fever. From my sister's tired face, I can feel her almost collapsed mood. Looking at her thin body, we are all very distressed. It seems that she hasn't laughed again in recent years.

It's better to be a child than to be in-laws to help with the baby. After all, the old man is old and has limited energy. Moreover, the old people's ideas and thoughts may not be in line with the present society, and their concern for children is limited to life. Parents should still worry more about education. Nowadays, many parents have to help a child with his homework until eleven or twelve o'clock in the evening. Too much, parents don't have to sleep at night, and their energy is really out of reach.

So from the perspective of personal energy, I think it is better to have a child at home.

More than 3 children are inevitably eccentric.

As the saying goes, the boss dotes on the third, and the second is unlucky. This is caused by parents' partiality. Anyone can say that a bowl of water is flat, but few people can really do it. Just like the joke told by Jia Mu in A Dream of Red Mansions: "The inheritance wind is too biased". If there is only one child in the family, no matter how parents educate him, the child will not feel that his parents don't love him. Because without contrast, there is no harm. If you have two more children, not only will parents be biased, but children will also compare with each other. Even if parents don't feel partial, children may think that parents love other children more. This is not only detrimental to the unity and harmony of brothers and sisters, but also affects children's mental health.

So considering parents' partiality and children's mental health, I still think it's better to have a child at home.