Is the Badaling tiger biting people because of a quarrel between husband and wife? Don't take the fake ones seriously!

The news about tigers eating humans at Beijing Badaling Wildlife Park has been a hot topic these past two days. Especially after the surveillance video was released, it shocked viewers even more. Most of the comments from netizens scolded this young woman for being too arrogant and willful, seeking her own death, and causing harm to her loved ones.

These comments are based on the cause of the accident that was reported after the incident: a man and a woman in the car quarreled, and the woman got out of the car angrily and went to pull the driver's door, but was pulled The tiger pounced and bit, causing tragedy.

If this is the case, then it is not an exaggeration for this woman to be condemned and scolded, but is this really the case? If you analyze it carefully and rationally, will you have different answers?

First of all, the source of the reason why a man and a woman got out of the car out of anger due to a quarrel is extremely unreliable, because this statement does not come from any serious media report, nor is it confirmed to be revealed from the person involved. Its source is just I don’t know where it came from, “according to insiders”, which is too unreliable and suspicious.

Secondly, let us analyze it bit by bit based on the surveillance video. Is the statement of "getting off the bus after a quarrel" reliable?

Most of my friends have had the experience of a couple quarreling, so let’s experience it based on life experience: Two people quarreled in the car, and then the male driver stopped the car. When the woman got off, Normally, one should open the door violently, get out of the car, angrily walk around the front of the car, yank open the male driver's side door, and argue with him. This is consistent with the action response under excitement.

But what about in the video? First, the white car stopped slowly, which at least showed that the male driver was in a relatively stable mood at that time. As for the woman, please note that she opened the passenger door, not the rear door, which means she was next to the male driver in the car. If you are really quarreling, do you need to get out of the car and go around to the other side to start the quarrel?

The woman opened the passenger door, looked back, and then closed the door slowly instead of slamming it.

The woman trotted around the front of the car

Seeing that she didn’t open the car door very hard, she didn’t close the car door very hard either. When she got out of the car, she first looked back. , then trotted around the front of the car and came to the driver's side. At this time, the door opened directly. It was the male driver who opened it, not the woman who forced it open!

The male driver took the initiative to open the door. If there was a quarrel, or he was worried about the tiger coming, he would not take the initiative to open the door so early.

When the male driver opened the door, you could see the woman looking back again. Judging from her movements, she was nervously observing the situation behind, fearing that a tiger would follow. There was also a possibility. , it was the car behind that was honking madly to urge or remind her.

While waiting to change positions, the woman looked back again. Perhaps she was worried about the tiger, or maybe the car behind her was honking a warning.

The tiger is coming. . . .

However, from the analysis of this series of actions, it should be concluded that when the woman got out of the car, she wanted to exchange places with the male driver. The male driver also took the initiative to open the door and prepared to get out of the car and change with her. It's not a quarrel, but a completed action. However, after the male driver opened the door, he got out of the car too slowly. If he had gotten out of the car quickly, or the tiger had arrived a little later, the woman would have sat in the driver's seat, and the male driver would have been outside the car. He might have been the one bitten.

When I first watched this video, I was also scolding this woman for being too willful. But when I watched it for the third time, I noticed the details of these actions. Based on these details, I came to the conclusion that this is really Not arguing, but exchanging positions.

Finally, the Beijing News and other media interviewed relatives, friends and colleagues of the person involved, and confirmed that the two were not quarreling at the time, but thought they had left the Huyuan area, so they got off the car and changed seats, leading to a tragedy. The woman was seriously injured, and her mother was killed by a tiger because she got out of the car to save her daughter.

The source of the statement "mistakenly thinking that I got off the bus after leaving the Tiger Park" is certain, but it is also inevitably suspicious.

Based on the analysis of the video, the woman looked back nervously twice after getting off the car. It is conceivable that she was not completely reassured at the time. She knew that she was still in a dangerous area, and the zoo's prompts should be obvious, and it is unlikely that there would be a misunderstanding. .

The real reason is that either this family is really stupid, or they take the rules too seriously.

Many of our compatriots really do not follow order and rules. When traveling, even though there are various express reminders and prohibitions, many tourists simply ignore them. They climb trees, break branches, carve words, feed indiscriminately and harm animals, there are too many to mention; They were illegal, parked indiscriminately, and were unscrupulous; in the wildlife park where the accident occurred, there were signs everywhere reminding you that you are not allowed to get out of the car in the wild animal area, and there were loudspeakers broadcasting, and they had signed an agreement with each tourist in advance, but they didn't abide by it like this If you follow the rules and take chances, you will end up harming yourself.

The current common view is that if the zoo has fulfilled its obligation to provide adequate reminders, rescue timely, and have a prior agreement, then the zoo is not responsible, and the tiger certainly should not be punished. Just because the injured are miserable, we cannot abandon our principles and let the non-fault party take responsibility. They are miserable, but objectively speaking, it is their own fault.

But even after the media reported the cause of the accident, there were still many people who abused and flogged the woman based on the rumors of a "couple quarreling". This was meaningless. Maybe the woman was stupid, but if She is not the kind to have a willful and violent temper, so it is unfair to scold her like this.

In this era of Internet communication, it has become the norm to forward without distinguishing what you hear, and to comment casually. However, there are fewer and fewer people who can analyze and speak rationally. Who is to blame? We cannot entirely blame the masses. They generally do not have the ability to distinguish the reliability of information sources. They generally believe that what is said on the Internet, circulated in friends circles, and reported in the news is true, so it is easy for rumors to spread.

Then the media has an even greater responsibility to clarify the truth. Especially as the neglected traditional media and serious media, this is when it comes into play. Serious investigation, scientific analysis, objective reporting, restoring the truth, and shattering rumors are the values ??of traditional media that should be reflected here. Unfortunately, many formal media outlets are trying to sensationalize and follow what others say, which is really shameful.

Among the large number of self-media, few can be rational and objective when faced with such hot events. Many self-media people, even if they know that the rumors of "couples quarreling" are unreliable, selectively ignore them. Probably because this rumor is shocking enough and can arouse the emotions of the audience, they would rather ignore the facts and accept it without any discernment, and make various comments based on it, follow the trend and earn clicks. Anyway, it is not too big a deal to watch the excitement. They don't have to bear any responsibility, as long as they pay attention.