Matters needing attention in trial teaching

First, the lecturer should be modest. There are many awesome people who come to our school to give lectures (such as masters, vice principals and, I heard, principals). Some people may have been used to being arrogant in their own territory before, and they can't whitewash their arrogance in their bones. Most of these awesome people will degenerate. I think in life, people who are too awesome are not interested. Being awesome in front of strangers can only make people feel disgusted or bored. Some people with some skills are unhappy at home, often because of arrogance. Go outside, I can't eat without changing my old character.

The vice principal in charge of teaching asked him how long it would take to prepare lessons. He read the text and said that one hour was enough. Well, it will be really excellent, of course, there is nothing to say. But the factual basis is unlikely, especially for those who teach Chinese. Our headmaster teaches Chinese and is not satisfied with all our Chinese teachers. Under the leadership of such a demanding principal, the Chinese teacher is not idle. It is extremely difficult for these Chinese teachers to pick out your shortcomings. No one is perfect, and the class is not finished. You want to come up with a perfect class in an hour. Are you a fairy?

There are also some performances: no self-introduction before class, which is the basic requirement of the school, and the vice principal will explain it before class. You'd better turn off your cell phone in class and never answer the phone. If you forget to turn off your phone, you'd better turn it off in time when others are on the phone, so as not to let others call again to disturb the class. This is all based on consciousness. Busy leaders are easy to get carried away. Strolling in other people's territory without saying hello to anyone. Do not pay attention to appearance and dress, and think that talented people do not cut their hair or trim their edges.

Second, the class should be concentrated, which is the basic requirement. But when it comes to the real class, it is the shortcoming of ordinary people to be reluctant to lose that reluctance. Try to talk for no more than 30 minutes. If you want to talk about everything, you can only scratch the surface. Teaching middle school teachers has a more serious disadvantage in this respect. There is a teacher who has a hard time in class. It is just a waste of effort to write on the blackboard from the author's introduction and article level. What era is it now? It is still the era of manual copying. It's still a classroom in the 1980s. All irrigation, all plagiarism. Even if you exert yourself, you can neither highlight the key points nor show your expertise, killing two birds with one stone.

Third, tell me your deep understanding of the article. It should be noted that to be good at inspiring and enticing students, we must pay attention to the audience, thinking that the following are college students who come to listen to the lecture. Last year, a university teacher tried to give a lecture on Venus of Milos, giving a 40-point lecture on aesthetics. After the lecture, the headmaster said there was no need to evaluate the class. This bias should be paid special attention to when a master or doctor tries to give a lecture. Because they are too knowledgeable, they tend to ignore the reality of middle school students, do not engage in inspiration and temptation, and hide. Such people are not suitable for middle school teaching, and schools certainly don't want them. To correct this shortcoming, we need to have some teaching experience in middle school. Therefore, a master who has never stood on the podium of a middle school may not succeed if he wants to enter a good middle school, unless others use it otherwise.

Fourth, don't talk too much about article study. Some teachers have done some research on article learning. When analyzing the text, they attach great importance to the anatomy of the article situation, such as rhetoric, writing skills, article characteristics, before and after reference, description classification, classification and application of expression skills, and article appreciation methods. These things are not forbidden, but they should not be the focus of the class. The teacher who said that preparing lessons only took one hour made this shortcoming. He has a good foundation and is good at writing articles. Results The whole class combined his knowledge of article study to dissect the structure and layout of words and sentences. Break it into pieces. That sounds reasonable. Finally, when commenting on the class, everyone thought that his understanding and analysis of the ideological content of the article was not in place, and he only understood it from the technical level.

Five, to sum up (for others' reference, but also for their own reference when preparing for the open class), try to do the following aspects in the lecture:

1. Keep your head down and be modest. No matter you are a leader or an ordinary teacher, you should pay attention to your words and deeds. A cow will capsize.

2, the lecture should have lofty sentiments, if the pitch is insufficient, at least the voice should be loud. Mandarin is a little more standard.

3. The speed of speaking and writing should not be too slow. Too slow, people will doubt your efficiency. Not too bad.

4, to use computers, to keep up with the pace of the times, the network era, teachers who do not use computers in class will be eliminated.

5. The focus of the class is prominent, and one or two points is enough. If you don't talk about the rest, you can't cover everything.

6. There should be interaction between teachers and students. Even in the face of the teacher's lecture, we should reflect on the student movement. Full house irrigation has long been out of date.

7. Don't exercise too much. The teacher only asked a few questions, but let the students discuss. Finally, the teacher doesn't make an in-depth summary.

8, the beauty of the article situation, writing knowledge can be said, but it is not the point, these things can not reflect your level.

9. Dig deep into the text and have original opinions on the ideological content. This is the most difficult and important, it reflects the level of teachers.

PS: article study's knowledge is like a master key and a scalpel, which can be used to dissect any article. But in addition to the characteristics of structural writing, the article also has its own emotions and thoughts, and teachers must lead students to appreciate and think together. If every class focuses on learning knowledge through articles, both students and teachers will get bored. That kind of class is only suitable for unit summary.

About the last point: the classroom situation is easy to learn, but it is not so easy to understand and analyze the text. A teacher had a good lesson. When someone asked him how long it would take to prepare lessons, he said, "I spent my whole life preparing this lesson, and the time for preparing lessons directly was 15 minutes." The teacher's presentation in class is a kind of accumulation, not just a skill problem. Without thorough text analysis, you can't tame critical professional judges.

How to deeply analyze thoughts and emotions? We can work hard from the following two aspects. First, enter the book. Put yourself in the author's shoes and think about why he thought like that at that time (this is also the reason why we should introduce the writing background of the article before class), and what is the significance of writing the article like that, so as to correctly understand the author's intention and grasp the center of the article. Second, publish a book. Contact other people's point of view or current situation (society or oneself) and examine the author's thoughts with modern eyes. Read the article alive, jump out of the article, don't stick to the author's thoughts, argue with the author, learn dialectically and use it flexibly.

No matter how much a class is taught, people can find the disadvantages. Chinese itself is criticized in a mess, and various theories are mixed, such as the problem of interaction. Now, most people say that anger in class is vivid, but some people say that the most important thing in interaction is energy interaction. In this respect, a wonderful Chinese class is much better than superficial interaction.

Since everyone likes it, let's add a little more.

1, the idea of the article is not the key point, the general idea of the article is very clear, and high school students can see it clearly, so it doesn't need to be the focus of the class. Junior high school teachers love to talk about the general idea of paragraphs, and senior high school teachers just need to click. )

2. Get to the point as soon as possible. Tell the key points in detail (that is, the places that can shine), otherwise the introduction will be too long and there will be too many other miscellaneous things, which will dilute the key points. During the trial lecture, you can omit the minor contents such as the introduction of the writer's works and the word check.

3, dig deep into the key points, and then click on other parts of the article to tick off the overall idea of the article, giving people a sense of integrity.

4. When analyzing key paragraphs, we should focus on key sentences and keywords, so as to be concrete and practical, otherwise it will be difficult to make it clear. The analysis is too detailed. If you want to analyze it too carefully, you must stay in the text of the text, so that it can be closely linked with the textbook and will not make the mistake of being divorced from the text.

5, it is not appropriate to show too much, too much will dilute the theme. Or more directly, lecturing is like writing an article, focusing on the central (key) text, and trying to talk less or no nonsense (which can arouse students' interest).