Joke Collection Website - Bulletin headlines - Should the urban management system be cancelled? 4 drafts of the debate

Should the urban management system be cancelled? 4 drafts of the debate

The fourth defense draft should be written based on the first defense draft that everyone has discussed, rather than working behind closed doors. And you didn’t say whether you should cancel or not. If there are no points, I will draw up a few examples for you.

The urban management system should not be abolished

Thank you to the judges and the chairman.

First of all, let me point out some mistakes made by the other party in the previous rounds of debates (omitted)

Now let me summarize my views again. First, from the perspective of environmental sanitation, the urban management's law enforcement has effectively curbed the dirty and messy environment. If the urban management cancels roadside stalls, there will be huge queues along the street. How should environmental sanitation be maintained? Second, from the perspective of From a food safety perspective, the illegal operation of roadside stalls has no food safety guarantee, which is harmful to the common people, and urban management can control this phenomenon; thirdly, from a traffic perspective, road Side stalls mostly occupy sidewalks or driveways, seriously impeding smooth traffic and posing many safety hazards. Urban management's law enforcement has effectively rectified traffic problems; fourthly, from a tax perspective, most roadside stalls are highly profitable but do not pay taxes. , this is unfavorable to the country’s tax policy. If everyone sets up roadside stalls, how can the country’s tax revenue be guaranteed and how can the international machine operate? It is necessary for urban management to crack down on it.

We cannot put all the blame on the urban management. The quality of some urban management personnel is low and their law enforcement behavior is inappropriate. This is just an example, which shows that there are internal problems in this team that need to be adjusted. We cannot ban it because of choking. Does the opponent's fellow debater mean that if corruption continues to be banned in China's political circles, we must overthrow the leadership of the Communist Party and establish a new regime? Such reactionary thinking is very dangerous.

To sum up, we insist that the urban management system should not be abolished.