Is the quality of Tesla really as bad as some people say?

I don't think the car quality problem caused this disaster! At the time of the incident, the owner did not get off the bus to check. After continuous driving for about 500 meters, the central control screen displays "active alarm", including text prompts such as "power has been reduced", "coolant level is low" and "driving recorder cannot write".

In this regard, the owner thinks it may be a "small problem." After driving all day, the owner's vehicle was towed away for inspection. The result is that "the water inside the battery needs to be replaced, and the maintenance price is estimated to be 6.5438+0.4 million yuan." After the vehicle hits the stone, the central control screen displays "Active Alarm". However, such high maintenance and replacement costs make the owner (Ms. Dong) unacceptable.

At present, the vehicle is going through the relevant process. In response to the amount of maintenance costs, Tesla responded that "the battery price accounts for half of the vehicle price, because the battery is more important, and its price is officially clearly marked." At the same time, they said, "This is an extreme case and does not represent the quality problem of Tesla."

If the vehicle has exceeded the warranty period, then the owner needs to bear the maintenance costs. This does not necessarily mean that Tesla has quality problems, but because the damage caused by stone impact is a common vehicle maintenance problem, and all automobile manufacturers are facing similar problems in this respect.

As we all know, Tesla is a relatively young automobile manufacturer, and their technology and engineering design are not perfect, but they have been constantly striving to improve and improve their quality. Tesla's leading position in the automotive industry benefits from their innovation and technological innovation, and their vehicles are widely regarded as high quality, high performance and high safety.