Whether the campus safety slogan of the debate should be a warm reminder or a shocking picture, I am the positive warm reminder and ask how to refute the attack of the opposing side.

if you want to know how to fight back, you have to know what their arguments are. Let's break the question first and see what the opposing argument can be.

if you are the opponent, how will you prove that "shocking pictures are better"? I'll probably say what I can think of.

1, shocking pictures are more likely to arouse people's fears.

2, shocking pictures are more likely to attract people's attention.

The conclusion is that shocking pictures can attract more attention and awaken people's fears, thus achieving the effect and purpose of warning.

You are the affirmative. If you want to refute it, you must refute it from the above two points.

First of all, you should list the disadvantages of shocking pictures:

1. The shocking pictures are too bloody and violent, which is easy to cause psychological shadow when seen by students. This kind of psychological injury is as serious as the accident injury, so it is an act of losing watermelon and picking up sesame seeds.

2. If the picture is not enough to cause psychological shadow, it must be blurred, and the blurred picture cannot arouse fear, thus failing to achieve the warning significance.

3, shocking pictures will make many timid students afraid to watch, and that warning slogan that no one reads will lose its meaning of existence, let alone the purpose of warning.

4. Fear can't play a good warning role. Every year, there are so many car accidents that every driver knows what car accidents are like, but they still happen. Aren't they afraid of car accidents? It's not that they didn't understand the accident scientifically and avoided it. The same is true of campus accidents. Just using fear to stop students from doing something is no different from the behavior of scaring fools with ghosts and gods in ancient times. The correct way is to use warm and acceptable slogans to remind everyone of behaviors that may trigger accidents from a scientific point of view, so that everyone can treat accidents rationally and avoid accidents scientifically. This is the right way.

As for the advantages and merits of warm slogans, this is a question that you should think carefully when you solve the problem, so I won't go into details here. The opposing side's point of view may be more than the two points I put forward. I hope that I can throw a brick to attract jade, and you can apply what you have learned. Don't copy and debate things. It is best to think of them yourself after all.