The Supreme Law promulgated "resolutely prevent the troublemakers from being justified, the transgressors from being justified and the injured from being justified". What information is worth paying a

The Supreme Law promulgated "resolutely prevent the troublemakers from being justified, the transgressors from being justified and the injured from being justified". What information is worth paying attention to? On August 2, the Supreme People's Court held a press conference, proposing that the people's courts should try in the middle, administer justice fairly, distinguish right from wrong, settle disputes, earnestly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people, give the parties a "statement" and restore social fairness and justice. Resolutely prevent "muddle" practices such as who is right and who is wrong, who is right and who is hurt, so that the judiciary has strength, right and wrong, and temperature, so that the judiciary can return to its original source and defend fairness and justice. Some netizens added that this is not complete. It should also include who is a foreigner and who is right, who is poor and who is right, who is old and who is weak, who is loud and who is right.

This statement made by the Supreme Court shows that the court system has had enough of the muddled phenomenon in grassroots law enforcement, which is of course a good thing. "Righteousness is not high", but when there is a dispute in reality, some people play hooligans by touching porcelain, falling down, splashing water and rolling around. And take the opportunity to extort money; In the online world, some people maliciously cut and splice in order to achieve their own goals, trying to reverse black and white. People who don't know the truth are easily deceived.

However, some relevant departments also have the problem of "distribution according to work" when dealing with disputes. Some law enforcement officers always want to "let nature take its course" and habitually "hit 50 boards each". Although this kind of operation is simple and easy, it often casts a layer of dust on fairness and justice.

What does this mean?

Now the statement of the Supreme Court shows that this matter has attracted attention, and attention is the prerequisite for making changes. It is expected that more people will feel fairness and justice in judicial practice. The law is very professional, and many people really can't understand the provisions, but everyone must see if a judgment is the will of the people.

We also expect to see those aggressive people pay the price and not get inexplicable preferential treatment because of their noisy, weak, poor, old and other gender advantages. For example, the driver of this car was given 1.500 yuan for stabbing the net with a knife. For example, a high-speed rail beating incident was characterized as a fight. For example, a university of political science and law in Beijing prevented a bullied boy from being reconciled. Every time this kind of muddle, the ultimate bill is the awe and credibility of the whole society to the law. Don't think it has nothing to do with us. Each of us is a potential victim.

What's the point?

Someone once asked if it was excusable to fight back when you were about to be killed. In other cases, it is either excessive defense or intentional injury. In fact, before the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme People's Law issued the guidance on proper defense, any pre-defense, post-defense, excessive defense or even intentional injury may occur, but real defense is difficult to identify.

But now, after the introduction of the guidance, the relevant provisions on who is right and who is wrong have been abolished, and the rule of law spirit that the law cannot bow to lawlessness has been resolutely defended. Illegal restriction of personal freedom, illegal intrusion into other people's houses, pulling the steering wheel, beating drivers, school bullying and other acts. You can defend yourself, and when you defend yourself, you are not so harsh. Everyone's suggestion here is to avoid it in the early stage. If the other party still pushes his nose to his face, then we will carry out the central idea of "if people don't attack me, I won't attack, and if people attack, I will attack."

In any case, this is the progress of judicial justice, which really clarifies the responsibilities and protects the interests of all parties. The public has a simple sense of justice. If these unreasonable entangled behaviors prevail, it will not only destroy the moral order, but also trample on the majesty of the law. Correcting "whoever can make trouble is justified" and "whoever is killed or injured is justified" can not only protect the real victims, but also embody the strict spirit of rule of law that "the law cannot bow to the law".